14% approval rating. LOL
Congress sucks and that is a bi-partisan view.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There's no term limits for lobbyists. Feeding them a steady stream of political novices would be a wet dream.
The first amendment shields lobbyists from direct regulation. The citizens united decision didn't help on the integrity front one bit.Or simply ban lobbyists altogether....
In Virginia the governor is limited to a single term. What it means in practice is that we have only lame duck governors and they are generally useless and make state government inefficient.14% approval rating. LOL
Congress sucks and that is a bi-partisan view.
You obviously didn’t watch the video but just came here to troll. CongratulationsCongress already has term limits
Two years in the House and six in the Senate
In conjunction with term limits, we need publicly funded campaigns (absolutely no private money), and eliminate all entertainment by lobbyists.The first amendment shields lobbyists from direct regulation. The citizens united decision didn't help on the integrity front one bit.
Term limits would be unconstitutional.In conjunction with term limits, we need publicly funded campaigns (absolutely no private money), and eliminate all entertainment by lobbyists.
That ship has sailed. Now that money=speech we have no way short of a new admendment to get big money influence out of politics.In conjunction with term limits, we need publicly funded campaigns (absolutely no private money), and eliminate all entertainment by lobbyists.
Outlawing private money would mean that rich candidates would have the advantage over poor ones, since they can't be stopped from using their personal fortunes for their campaign.In conjunction with term limits, we need publicly funded campaigns (absolutely no private money), and eliminate all entertainment by lobbyists.
Not only does money=speech, but corporations=people.That ship has sailed. Now that money=speech we have no way short of a new admendment to get big money influence out of politics.
There's no term limits for lobbyists. Feeding them a steady stream of political novices would be a wet dream.
Of course they won't do that, which is why states need to amend the Constitution and do it themselvesI think Congress would have to write the term-limits law and vote on it.
Good luck getting it passed.
We have that now too.Outlawing private money would mean that rich candidates would have the advantage over poor ones, since they can't be stopped from using their personal fortunes for their campaign.
We can't afford it!In conjunction with term limits, we need publicly funded campaigns (absolutely no private money), and eliminate all entertainment by lobbyists.