Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #441
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Telling her the exact page is hardly "Wild Goose" and Ive gotten in trouble for not "reading up" on a thread before posting.
Maybe if the thread wasnt full of 15 pages of you neg repping people no one would have to go on a "Wild Goose Chase"
please dont neg rep me
well, whether people think it was illogical or not, to come to the conclusion that Saddam was involved with the 911 attack on America, more than 2/3's of America polled, saying just that....
Even now. I think polling shows a third still believe that Saddam was involved in the 911 attack?
I am NOT stupid enough or ignorant enough to believe that this kind of result takes place by "happenstance", cuz it doesn't happen by chance.... And I am not stupid enough to throw all polls out because I don't like them or they are not perfect.... even the best of the best use polls, like Carl Rove, the Rnc, the Dnc etc...they use them because they do give you a reading and a pulse on what is going on "out there"?
In my career, I have always used a group of 20-50 people as test/focus groups, when introducing a new product..... and believe it or not, those 50 people's comments on the product and acceptance rate, could darn near dictate the saleability of the new product for the entire country...and we extrapillated the results from these 50 people in to a projection of what we needed to have manufactured for our consumers...east coast to west coast, north to south.... off of the results of a 50 person test market.
Numbers and mathematics and computers are a "wonderful thing"!
With the number of times that the Bush administration mentioned the very same things in all of their preplanned and supposedly spontaneuos speeches to the public makes it evident to me that rove or whoever was their P.R. marketing person in charge of getting the message out in unison, that these statements were "orchestrated".
And if they were "orchestrated" then that means that they were intentionally planned... and if they were planned, they were planned for a reason... a "result" was calculated.
Companies pay millions to marketing firms to get results half as good as these....
As a person with alot of years in the field, I see a terrific "marketing strategy" unfold, when I examine all the articles that show their repeated statement that made "one think" that Saddam had "something" to do with 911 and the terrorists that executed the 911 attack on us.
Emotions were very high when this campaign to bagdhad began...
all of this combined made the marketing strategy work like a dream, a dream come true.
Care
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in525165.shtml
this is the text of the order
Whereas members of al-Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;
Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of American citizens;
Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;
There is no evidence to support Bush or his administration being behind such illogical crap. Period. Whether or not you wish to believe it is "happenstance" or whatever, is irrelevant to THAT fact.
well, whether people think it was illogical or not, to come to the conclusion that Saddam was involved with the 911 attack on America, more than 2/3's of America polled, saying just that....
Even now. I think polling shows a third still believe that Saddam was involved in the 911 attack?
I am NOT stupid enough or ignorant enough to believe that this kind of result takes place by "happenstance", cuz it doesn't happen by chance.... And I am not stupid enough to throw all polls out because I don't like them or they are not perfect.... even the best of the best use polls, like Carl Rove, the Rnc, the Dnc etc...they use them because they do give you a reading and a pulse on what is going on "out there"?
In my career, I have always used a group of 20-50 people as test/focus groups, when introducing a new product..... and believe it or not, those 50 people's comments on the product and acceptance rate, could darn near dictate the saleability of the new product for the entire country...and we extrapillated the results from these 50 people in to a projection of what we needed to have manufactured for our consumers...east coast to west coast, north to south.... off of the results of a 50 person test market.
Numbers and mathematics and computers are a "wonderful thing"!
With the number of times that the Bush administration mentioned the very same things in all of their preplanned and supposedly spontaneuos speeches to the public makes it evident to me that rove or whoever was their P.R. marketing person in charge of getting the message out in unison, that these statements were "orchestrated".
And if they were "orchestrated" then that means that they were intentionally planned... and if they were planned, they were planned for a reason... a "result" was calculated.
Companies pay millions to marketing firms to get results half as good as these....
As a person with alot of years in the field, I see a terrific "marketing strategy" unfold, when I examine all the articles that show their repeated statement that made "one think" that Saddam had "something" to do with 911 and the terrorists that executed the 911 attack on us.
Emotions were very high when this campaign to bagdhad began...
all of this combined made the marketing strategy work like a dream, a dream come true.
Care
I've given up on you being a person of logic!!!!!!
Let's just say people who are probably alot smarter than you, who had more hands on information than we do, disagree with you....
Care
I've given up on you being a person of logic!!!!!!
Let's just say people who are probably alot smarter than you, who had more hands on information than we do, disagree with you....
Care
The first paragrah states "members of al Qaeda," but no Iraq.
Paragraph two states "Iraq" and "other terrorist organizations," but no al Qaeda.
Paragraph three addresses terrorists acquiring WMDs.
Prety clear and concise and doesn't say a damned thing in support of your argument.