Muslim student at Wichita State reports attack by man shouting ‘Trump, Trump, Trump’

[Pogo]

So in other words Pogo....a fight at a Kwik Mart in Wichita, Kansas. Wow. Sweet story broski.

But where is the hate crime the OP spoke of???

The OP said it was reported. Which it was.
Only you, tuna-boat boy and Popeye made the absolute statements that it did not happen.

Which none of you were able to prove.

Sucks 2BU huh?

 

[bucs90]

And the hits just keep on coming. If Trump doesn't screw up his bid for the White House his racist supporters definitely will

A Muslim student at Wichita State University says he and a Hispanic friend, who also is a student, were attacked over the weekend by a man who shouted racial epithets and “Trump, Trump, Trump” before riding away on his motorcycle.

Khondoker Usama, the student body vice president at Wichita State, who is Muslim, said he and a Hispanic friend, who so far has chosen to remain anonymous, were filling their vehicle at the gas pumps at a Kwik Shop near campus at 21st and Oliver early Saturday when a man in his 20s or 30s started calling a black customer at the convenience store a racial epithet.

“Then suddenly it turned onto us, calling us ‘brown trash, go home. Trump will win,’ ” Usama said.

Then the man approached the students and, according to Usama, said, “You want to live in this country, you better leave.”

Muslim student at Wichita State reports attack by man shouting ‘Trump, Trump, Trump’

So some anonymous American out of hundreds of millions insults another, and that means Trump should not be elected?

Can you idiots get any more desperate?

If some Trump supporter sneezes without covering his mouth, is that a reason to vote against Trump?

There's absolutely no proof Trump's name was used in this fight in Kansas, or that his rhetoric had anything to do with it.

 

[bucs90]

So in other words Pogo....a fight at a Kwik Mart in Wichita, Kansas. Wow. Sweet story broski.

But where is the hate crime the OP spoke of???

The OP said it was reported. Which it was.
Only you, tuna-boat boy and Popeye made the absolute statements that it did not happen.

Which none of you were able to prove.

Sucks 2BU huh?

Not at all. You lost badly here. You're the Jeb Bush of USMB.

We see a fight in Kansas. And yall say a hate crime occurred. Show me.

 

[Pogo]

So in other words Pogo....a fight at a Kwik Mart in Wichita, Kansas. Wow. Sweet story broski.

But where is the hate crime the OP spoke of???

The OP said it was reported. Which it was.
Only you, tuna-boat boy and Popeye made the absolute statements that it did not happen.

Which none of you were able to prove.

Sucks 2BU huh?

Not at all. You lost badly here. You're the Jeb Bush of USMB.

We see a fight in Kansas. And yall say a hate crime occurred. Show me.

Nnnoooo, YOU show ME where I said that.

Did you ever learn to read?

 

[Pogo]

And the hits just keep on coming. If Trump doesn't screw up his bid for the White House his racist supporters definitely will

A Muslim student at Wichita State University says he and a Hispanic friend, who also is a student, were attacked over the weekend by a man who shouted racial epithets and “Trump, Trump, Trump” before riding away on his motorcycle.

Khondoker Usama, the student body vice president at Wichita State, who is Muslim, said he and a Hispanic friend, who so far has chosen to remain anonymous, were filling their vehicle at the gas pumps at a Kwik Shop near campus at 21st and Oliver early Saturday when a man in his 20s or 30s started calling a black customer at the convenience store a racial epithet.

“Then suddenly it turned onto us, calling us ‘brown trash, go home. Trump will win,’ ” Usama said.

Then the man approached the students and, according to Usama, said, “You want to live in this country, you better leave.”

Muslim student at Wichita State reports attack by man shouting ‘Trump, Trump, Trump’

So some anonymous American out of hundreds of millions insults another, and that means Trump should not be elected?

Can you idiots get any more desperate?

If some Trump supporter sneezes without covering his mouth, is that a reason to vote against Trump?

There's absolutely no proof Trump's name was used in this fight in Kansas, or that his rhetoric had anything to
do with it.

No shit, Sherlock. I noted that four hundred posts back. Six days ago.
And I posed the question as to why it's so important to you that it be disproven.

I have yet to get an answer.

 

[MaryL]

And the hits just keep on coming. If Trump doesn't screw up his bid for the White House his racist supporters definitely will

A Muslim student at Wichita State University says he and a Hispanic friend, who also is a student, were attacked over the weekend by a man who shouted racial epithets and “Trump, Trump, Trump” before riding away on his motorcycle.

Khondoker Usama, the student body vice president at Wichita State, who is Muslim, said he and a Hispanic friend, who so far has chosen to remain anonymous, were filling their vehicle at the gas pumps at a Kwik Shop near campus at 21st and Oliver early Saturday when a man in his 20s or 30s started calling a black customer at the convenience store a racial epithet.

“Then suddenly it turned onto us, calling us ‘brown trash, go home. Trump will win,’ ” Usama said.

Then the man approached the students and, according to Usama, said, “You want to live in this country, you better leave.”

Muslim student at Wichita State reports attack by man shouting ‘Trump, Trump, Trump’

This is a threat to world security? Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Muslims persecute Jews and Christians and behead people and crash planes in buildings. Not feeling the pain here.

 

[S.J.]

Well well. More video has been released.
Obviously this is a sizeable store and has multiple camera surveillance. More angles have been released of the same incident on this page from KAKE.

First 10:47 of the video (labeled "Cam 8") is an angle from the front/side of the store, looking out at the gas pumps and the street. Unfortunately the pump where the action is is in the distance and lying under the time/date stamp, so what's going on in the distance is not clear. But what is clear is the biker first arriving (in the front of the store) and eventually interacting in some way with somebody there at the front of the store (visible in the first two angles, although the other party is out of the shot) --- judging from a later angle it could be someone in a small dark-colored parked car. Whatever is going on there is what attracted the attention of the passenger in the distance, since that's when he gets out of the car to watch. And looking at how far their car is from the front of the store, it had to be quite loud.

Biker arrives around 2:26 (of the video). Between 0315 and 0316 (time stamp) he gets on his bike, starts interacting with the car in the distance, gives a parting shot to whoever he's talking to in the foreground, and then motors out to the car where he abruptly parks in front of them.

We saw the next bit (the angle which is also in this composite video later) -- and then in this first angle we see more, including the biker's entire exit, as he ballyhoos around the parking lot giving the finger to the two brown people (3:18:52).

The whole time, there is a guy sitting in a white pickup truck in the foreground. A few minutes after the biker drives off when the cops are called, the white pickup guy gets out of his truck and walks to the plaintiff's car where he has a short conversation with them. You can't see what he's doing in the beyond in the first angle but you can easily see it in the later one.

First angle: "Cam 8", about 10:47 of video. Note that video plays at double speed, that's why people and cars look like they're waddling around at exaggerated speed. Shows entry/exit of biker and interaction with plaintiff's car in the distance.

Second angle: "Pumps 5 6 7 8 9 10 11" --- apparently next camera to the left, shows plaintiff's pump more straight-on. Shows biker's altercation with first party in lower right corner, although that party is off camera.

Third angle: "Pumps 1 2 3 4": I think this is the angle we had before, longer cut thereof including the arrival of the police at 0328.

Fourth angle called "Cam 12" is pretty much a useless shot of the far corner, showing only the bike coming in. Presumably it's in play because a higher resolution might give ID clues on the bike.

There are also a white SUV that pulls out from in front of the store sometime after the incident, and another darker car parked at the pump in the next lane, although no one seems to be inside it. So there appear to be a couple of other witnesses besides the two plaintiffs.


So much for "the brown guy started it". Lying assholes.

Thanks for posting another video that shows the same thing, moron. Did you expect it to show something different?
We see, yet again how the punk in the white shirt yelled something at the biker, the biker coming over and getting off his bike, the punk rolling up his sleeves like he wants to fight, no move by the biker until the punk pokes him with his finger in the chest, the biker swings at him but doesn't connect. The biker then tries to leave but the punk keeps running up on him, not letting him leave. The biker finally has enough and kicks the punk's ass, then leaves.
What's so damn funny about this whole thing is how you can still come back and show your utter stupidity by doubling down on your insistence that the punk in the white shirt didn't provoke the fight when the video clearly shows he did. You truly are stupid on so many levels, pogo. LMAO!

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

 

[Pogo]

Well well. More video has been released.
Obviously this is a sizeable store and has multiple camera surveillance. More angles have been released of the same incident on this page from KAKE.

First 10:47 of the video (labeled "Cam 8") is an angle from the front/side of the store, looking out at the gas pumps and the street. Unfortunately the pump where the action is is in the distance and lying under the time/date stamp, so what's going on in the distance is not clear. But what is clear is the biker first arriving (in the front of the store) and eventually interacting in some way with somebody there at the front of the store (visible in the first two angles, although the other party is out of the shot) --- judging from a later angle it could be someone in a small dark-colored parked car. Whatever is going on there is what attracted the attention of the passenger in the distance, since that's when he gets out of the car to watch. And looking at how far their car is from the front of the store, it had to be quite loud.

Biker arrives around 2:26 (of the video). Between 0315 and 0316 (time stamp) he gets on his bike, starts interacting with the car in the distance, gives a parting shot to whoever he's talking to in the foreground, and then motors out to the car where he abruptly parks in front of them.

We saw the next bit (the angle which is also in this composite video later) -- and then in this first angle we see more, including the biker's entire exit, as he ballyhoos around the parking lot giving the finger to the two brown people (3:18:52).

The whole time, there is a guy sitting in a white pickup truck in the foreground. A few minutes after the biker drives off when the cops are called, the white pickup guy gets out of his truck and walks to the plaintiff's car where he has a short conversation with them. You can't see what he's doing in the beyond in the first angle but you can easily see it in the later one.

First angle: "Cam 8", about 10:47 of video. Note that video plays at double speed, that's why people and cars look like they're waddling around at exaggerated speed. Shows entry/exit of biker and interaction with plaintiff's car in the distance.

Second angle: "Pumps 5 6 7 8 9 10 11" --- apparently next camera to the left, shows plaintiff's pump more straight-on. Shows biker's altercation with first party in lower right corner, although that party is off camera.

Third angle: "Pumps 1 2 3 4": I think this is the angle we had before, longer cut thereof including the arrival of the police at 0328.

Fourth angle called "Cam 12" is pretty much a useless shot of the far corner, showing only the bike coming in. Presumably it's in play because a higher resolution might give ID clues on the bike.

There are also a white SUV that pulls out from in front of the store sometime after the incident, and another darker car parked at the pump in the next lane, although no one seems to be inside it. So there appear to be a couple of other witnesses besides the two plaintiffs.


So much for "the brown guy started it". Lying assholes.

Thanks for posting another video that shows the same thing, moron. Did you expect it to show something different?
We see, yet again how the punk in the white shirt yelled something at the biker, the biker coming over and getting off his bike, the punk rolling up his sleeves like he wants to fight, no move by the biker until the punk pokes him with his finger in the chest, the biker swings at him but doesn't connect. The biker then tries to leave but the punk keeps running up on him, not letting him leave. The biker finally has enough and kicks the punk's ass, then leaves.
What's so damn funny about this whole thing is how you can still come back and show your utter stupidity by doubling down on your insistence that the punk in the white shirt didn't provoke the fight when the video clearly shows he did. You truly are stupid on so many levels, pogo. LMAO!

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

 

[S.J.]

Well well. More video has been released.
Obviously this is a sizeable store and has multiple camera surveillance. More angles have been released of the same incident on this page from KAKE.

First 10:47 of the video (labeled "Cam 8") is an angle from the front/side of the store, looking out at the gas pumps and the street. Unfortunately the pump where the action is is in the distance and lying under the time/date stamp, so what's going on in the distance is not clear. But what is clear is the biker first arriving (in the front of the store) and eventually interacting in some way with somebody there at the front of the store (visible in the first two angles, although the other party is out of the shot) --- judging from a later angle it could be someone in a small dark-colored parked car. Whatever is going on there is what attracted the attention of the passenger in the distance, since that's when he gets out of the car to watch. And looking at how far their car is from the front of the store, it had to be quite loud.

Biker arrives around 2:26 (of the video). Between 0315 and 0316 (time stamp) he gets on his bike, starts interacting with the car in the distance, gives a parting shot to whoever he's talking to in the foreground, and then motors out to the car where he abruptly parks in front of them.

We saw the next bit (the angle which is also in this composite video later) -- and then in this first angle we see more, including the biker's entire exit, as he ballyhoos around the parking lot giving the finger to the two brown people (3:18:52).

The whole time, there is a guy sitting in a white pickup truck in the foreground. A few minutes after the biker drives off when the cops are called, the white pickup guy gets out of his truck and walks to the plaintiff's car where he has a short conversation with them. You can't see what he's doing in the beyond in the first angle but you can easily see it in the later one.

First angle: "Cam 8", about 10:47 of video. Note that video plays at double speed, that's why people and cars look like they're waddling around at exaggerated speed. Shows entry/exit of biker and interaction with plaintiff's car in the distance.

Second angle: "Pumps 5 6 7 8 9 10 11" --- apparently next camera to the left, shows plaintiff's pump more straight-on. Shows biker's altercation with first party in lower right corner, although that party is off camera.

Third angle: "Pumps 1 2 3 4": I think this is the angle we had before, longer cut thereof including the arrival of the police at 0328.

Fourth angle called "Cam 12" is pretty much a useless shot of the far corner, showing only the bike coming in. Presumably it's in play because a higher resolution might give ID clues on the bike.

There are also a white SUV that pulls out from in front of the store sometime after the incident, and another darker car parked at the pump in the next lane, although no one seems to be inside it. So there appear to be a couple of other witnesses besides the two plaintiffs.


So much for "the brown guy started it". Lying assholes.

Thanks for posting another video that shows the same thing, moron. Did you expect it to show something different?
We see, yet again how the punk in the white shirt yelled something at the biker, the biker coming over and getting off his bike, the punk rolling up his sleeves like he wants to fight, no move by the biker until the punk pokes him with his finger in the chest, the biker swings at him but doesn't connect. The biker then tries to leave but the punk keeps running up on him, not letting him leave. The biker finally has enough and kicks the punk's ass, then leaves.
What's so damn funny about this whole thing is how you can still come back and show your utter stupidity by doubling down on your insistence that the punk in the white shirt didn't provoke the fight when the video clearly shows he did. You truly are stupid on so many levels, pogo. LMAO!

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

 

[Pogo]

Well well. More video has been released.
Obviously this is a sizeable store and has multiple camera surveillance. More angles have been released of the same incident on this page from KAKE.

First 10:47 of the video (labeled "Cam 8") is an angle from the front/side of the store, looking out at the gas pumps and the street. Unfortunately the pump where the action is is in the distance and lying under the time/date stamp, so what's going on in the distance is not clear. But what is clear is the biker first arriving (in the front of the store) and eventually interacting in some way with somebody there at the front of the store (visible in the first two angles, although the other party is out of the shot) --- judging from a later angle it could be someone in a small dark-colored parked car. Whatever is going on there is what attracted the attention of the passenger in the distance, since that's when he gets out of the car to watch. And looking at how far their car is from the front of the store, it had to be quite loud.

Biker arrives around 2:26 (of the video). Between 0315 and 0316 (time stamp) he gets on his bike, starts interacting with the car in the distance, gives a parting shot to whoever he's talking to in the foreground, and then motors out to the car where he abruptly parks in front of them.

We saw the next bit (the angle which is also in this composite video later) -- and then in this first angle we see more, including the biker's entire exit, as he ballyhoos around the parking lot giving the finger to the two brown people (3:18:52).

The whole time, there is a guy sitting in a white pickup truck in the foreground. A few minutes after the biker drives off when the cops are called, the white pickup guy gets out of his truck and walks to the plaintiff's car where he has a short conversation with them. You can't see what he's doing in the beyond in the first angle but you can easily see it in the later one.

First angle: "Cam 8", about 10:47 of video. Note that video plays at double speed, that's why people and cars look like they're waddling around at exaggerated speed. Shows entry/exit of biker and interaction with plaintiff's car in the distance.

Second angle: "Pumps 5 6 7 8 9 10 11" --- apparently next camera to the left, shows plaintiff's pump more straight-on. Shows biker's altercation with first party in lower right corner, although that party is off camera.

Third angle: "Pumps 1 2 3 4": I think this is the angle we had before, longer cut thereof including the arrival of the police at 0328.

Fourth angle called "Cam 12" is pretty much a useless shot of the far corner, showing only the bike coming in. Presumably it's in play because a higher resolution might give ID clues on the bike.

There are also a white SUV that pulls out from in front of the store sometime after the incident, and another darker car parked at the pump in the next lane, although no one seems to be inside it. So there appear to be a couple of other witnesses besides the two plaintiffs.


So much for "the brown guy started it". Lying assholes.

Thanks for posting another video that shows the same thing, moron. Did you expect it to show something different?
We see, yet again how the punk in the white shirt yelled something at the biker, the biker coming over and getting off his bike, the punk rolling up his sleeves like he wants to fight, no move by the biker until the punk pokes him with his finger in the chest, the biker swings at him but doesn't connect. The biker then tries to leave but the punk keeps running up on him, not letting him leave. The biker finally has enough and kicks the punk's ass, then leaves.
What's so damn funny about this whole thing is how you can still come back and show your utter stupidity by doubling down on your insistence that the punk in the white shirt didn't provoke the fight when the video clearly shows he did. You truly are stupid on so many levels, pogo. LMAO!

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

 

[S.J.]

Thanks for posting another video that shows the same thing, moron. Did you expect it to show something different?
We see, yet again how the punk in the white shirt yelled something at the biker, the biker coming over and getting off his bike, the punk rolling up his sleeves like he wants to fight, no move by the biker until the punk pokes him with his finger in the chest, the biker swings at him but doesn't connect. The biker then tries to leave but the punk keeps running up on him, not letting him leave. The biker finally has enough and kicks the punk's ass, then leaves.
What's so damn funny about this whole thing is how you can still come back and show your utter stupidity by doubling down on your insistence that the punk in the white shirt didn't provoke the fight when the video clearly shows he did. You truly are stupid on so many levels, pogo. LMAO!

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

The shit was started by the little punk in the white shirt, as your video clearly shows. And I guess the 50 or 60 feet to the other side of the gas station is like a hundred miles to you and your camel, Dumbassssss.

 

[Pogo]

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

The shit was started by the little punk in the white shirt, as your video clearly shows. And I guess the 50 or 60 feet to the other side of the gas station is like a hundred miles to you and your camel, Dumbassssss.

If your wet dream brown people fantasy were anywhere near true, the Wichita police wouldn't still be looking for the perp.

Ruh roh. Didn't think of that, didja?

Dumbassssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.

 

[bucs90]

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

The shit was started by the little punk in the white shirt, as your video clearly shows. And I guess the 50 or 60 feet to the other side of the gas station is like a hundred miles to you and your camel, Dumbassssss.

If your wet dream brown people fantasy were anywhere near true, the Wichita police wouldn't still be looking for the perp.

Ruh roh. Didn't think of that, didja?

Dumbassssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.

Of course they're still looking for him. He might be the key piece of evidence for them to charge the Mexican with false information to police...since there was no hate crime.

 

[beagle9]

Thanks for posting another video that shows the same thing, moron. Did you expect it to show something different?
We see, yet again how the punk in the white shirt yelled something at the biker, the biker coming over and getting off his bike, the punk rolling up his sleeves like he wants to fight, no move by the biker until the punk pokes him with his finger in the chest, the biker swings at him but doesn't connect. The biker then tries to leave but the punk keeps running up on him, not letting him leave. The biker finally has enough and kicks the punk's ass, then leaves.
What's so damn funny about this whole thing is how you can still come back and show your utter stupidity by doubling down on your insistence that the punk in the white shirt didn't provoke the fight when the video clearly shows he did. You truly are stupid on so many levels, pogo. LMAO!

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

. The bystander getting out of the passenger side of the vehicle he was in, and all because his friend heard or saw a rukus between the biker and another person going on while pumping gas, was the beginning of a number of problems that led up to the ultimate problem of the biker bringing the fight over to them.... The cupping of his hands to yell or hollar something over in their direction (as if wanting to involve himself in the incident taking place), was a mistake, otherwise by projecting words over into the direction of the conflict happening is where it all went south from there for them. The lesson learned is to mind your own business, and if need be call 911 if think someone might be endanger of being hurt or possibly killed by another. The yelling something over into the direction of a fight, just brought the fight over to them. Then what was even worse, is that the guy hollared at a biker guy that wanted to kick butt, and by the looks of it he wanted to kick anyone's butt who wanted to try him. Lucky for his friend who wanted no part of the big feller, the biker kept his anger on the one who yelled something and not on him too.

 

[bucs90]

Actually what's epic stupidity is YOUR doubling down on what's clearly even less of a case than you had. That, and the belief that posting "LMAO" somehow makes the post fairy bless your bullshit.

I linked videos. You? Just watching.

You lose.

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

. The bystander getting out of the passenger side of the vehicle he was in, and all because his friend heard or saw a rukus between the biker and another person going on while pumping gas, was the beginning of a number of problems that led up to the ultimate problem of the biker bringing the fight over to them.... The cupping his hands as if to involve himself in the incident taking place, otherwise by projecting words over into the direction of the conflict happening, is where it all went south from there. The lesson learned is to mind your own business, and if need be call 911 if think someone might be endanger of being hurt or possibly killed by another. The yelling something over into the direction of a fight, just brought the fight over to them. Then what was even worse, is that the guy hollared at a biker guy that wanted to kick butt, and by the looks of it he wanted to kick anyone's butt who wanted to try him.

It sums up liberals. They want to provoke the bees nest but then ***** when they get stung.

 

[beagle9]

Hahahahaha! You posted a video and the video proves you wrong, you stupid ****. You must be a glutton for punishment to keep coming back and humiliating yourself. Still LMAO!

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

. The bystander getting out of the passenger side of the vehicle he was in, and all because his friend heard or saw a rukus between the biker and another person going on while pumping gas, was the beginning of a number of problems that led up to the ultimate problem of the biker bringing the fight over to them.... The cupping his hands as if to involve himself in the incident taking place, otherwise by projecting words over into the direction of the conflict happening, is where it all went south from there. The lesson learned is to mind your own business, and if need be call 911 if think someone might be endanger of being hurt or possibly killed by another. The yelling something over into the direction of a fight, just brought the fight over to them. Then what was even worse, is that the guy hollared at a biker guy that wanted to kick butt, and by the looks of it he wanted to kick anyone's butt who wanted to try him.

It sums up liberals. They want to provoke the bees nest but then ***** when they get stung.

. Looks like what happened.

 

[Pogo]

aaaaaand you just did the same thing again. OK then. SMH.

Still reading about as well as you did when you put my quote in your sigline. TO THIS DAY you haven't figured out what it means and what it doesn't.

The videos? On the contrary, they corroborate the plaintiff's account that they observed the biker ******* with somebody else. We can *SEE* it. Just as we can see him start the bike and ride a considerable distance to go and **** with them. Then we can see him taunting the (other) two brown people before he rides away.

There ain't a god damn thing you can do about that. No more than there's anything you can do about the fact that it's still an open police case, which it would not be if your wacko wishy "brown guy did it" thinking could possibly apply here.

Still butthurt over my sigline, I see. Good. And the biker didn't ride a "considerable distance" to go **** with the punk who yelled at him, unless you consider the other side of the gas station a "considerable distance". Gawd, what a freakin' moron you are.

When you have to get on your camel and ride there, yes Doofus it's a considerable distance. Compared to our earlier impression which sounded like he was at another gas pump. No, this guy went out of his way to start shit. That's one of the reasons your helpless flailing attempt at novel writing can't work. That's the point.

Dumbasssssss.....

The shit was started by the little punk in the white shirt, as your video clearly shows. And I guess the 50 or 60 feet to the other side of the gas station is like a hundred miles to you and your camel, Dumbassssss.

If your wet dream brown people fantasy were anywhere near true, the Wichita police wouldn't still be looking for the perp.

Ruh roh. Didn't think of that, didja?

Dumbassssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.

Of course they're still looking for him. He might be the key piece of evidence for them to charge the Mexican with false information to police...since there was no hate crime.

And what 'false information' might that be?

It's on video. You swore up and down it didn't happen at all. But it did.
Own it.

 

[Pogo]

The cupping of his hands to yell or hollar something over in their direction (as if wanting to involve himself in the incident taking place), was a mistake

Who's to say? We can't tell what he might have been saying or who he was addressing. Could have been addressing the biker's target.

the biker bringing the fight over to them

Yes, that's clear now.

The yelling something over into the direction of a fight, just brought the fight over to them.

Ditto.

The lesson learned is to mind your own business,

-- or what?
Keep your nose out of somebody else being assaulted or ---- you'll get assaulted too?
That's still illegal in 57 states.

 

[beagle9]

The cupping of his hands to yell or hollar something over in their direction (as if wanting to involve himself in the incident taking place), was a mistake

Who's to say? We can't tell what he might have been saying or who he was addressing. Could have been addressing the biker's target.

the biker bringing the fight over to them

Yes, that's clear now.

The yelling something over into the direction of a fight, just brought the fight over to them.

Ditto.

The lesson learned is to mind your own business,

-- or what?
Keep your nose out of somebody else being assaulted or ---- you'll get assaulted too?
That's still illegal in 57 states.

Call 911, don't endanger yourself to be hurt or even killed let alone your friend also. Now if have a CCP, and a gun, and you feel as if you can stop a potential killing or assault from happening before the police have time to arrive on time, then that's different. But you best make sure it is the very last resort, and that you are trained properly in the situation.

 

[Pogo]

The cupping of his hands to yell or hollar something over in their direction (as if wanting to involve himself in the incident taking place), was a mistake

Who's to say? We can't tell what he might have been saying or who he was addressing. Could have been addressing the biker's target.

the biker bringing the fight over to them

Yes, that's clear now.

The yelling something over into the direction of a fight, just brought the fight over to them.

Ditto.

The lesson learned is to mind your own business,

-- or what?
Keep your nose out of somebody else being assaulted or ---- you'll get assaulted too?
That's still illegal in 57 states.

Call 911, don't endanger yourself to be hurt or even killed let alone your friend also. Now if have a CCP, and a gun, and you feel as if you can stop a potential killing or assault from happening before the police have time to arrive on time, then that's different. But you best make sure it is the very last resort, and that you are trained properly in the situation.

Whatever. Not relevant here. The incident absolutely DID happen, contrary to the revisionists' denials.

What is relevant is post 59. That was never addressed.
Wonder why.