Muslim student at Wichita State reports attack by man shouting ‘Trump, Trump, Trump’

[beagle9]

The cupping of his hands to yell or hollar something over in their direction (as if wanting to involve himself in the incident taking place), was a mistake

Who's to say? We can't tell what he might have been saying or who he was addressing. Could have been addressing the biker's target.

the biker bringing the fight over to them

Yes, that's clear now.

The yelling something over into the direction of a fight, just brought the fight over to them.

Ditto.

The lesson learned is to mind your own business,

-- or what?
Keep your nose out of somebody else being assaulted or ---- you'll get assaulted too?
That's still illegal in 57 states.

Call 911, don't endanger yourself to be hurt or even killed let alone your friend also. Now if have a CCP, and a gun, and you feel as if you can stop a potential killing or assault from happening before the police have time to arrive on time, then that's different. But you best make sure it is the very last resort, and that you are trained properly in the situation.

Whatever. Not relevant here. The incident absolutely DID happen, contrary to the revisionists' denials.

What is relevant is post 59. That was never addressed.
Wonder why.

. Your statement made it relevant... Just responded to your words is all...

 

[S.J.]

The shithead in the white shirt picked a fight with the biker and got his ass kicked. End of story. There was no "hate crime", that's ridiculous and it's typical of a loser liberal claiming a racial incident when there was none. Now we have 24 pages of pogo struggling to pretend he didn't make a fool out of himself. He needs to just slink away in shame with his tail tucked between his legs and disappear for a few months. LMAO

 

[Pogo]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

 

[S.J.]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

 

[bucs90]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

You just asked for a link to nothing. How does one link to something that doesn't exist? It's come to this huh?

 

[Pogo]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

You just asked for a link to nothing. How does one link to something that doesn't exist? It's come to this huh?

View attachment 68489

I asked for a link to a negative. The one the poster proclaimed. Same one you proclaimed a week ago.

How'd that work out for ya?

 

[Pogo]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

 

[S.J.]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Where's your proof of a hate crime, big mouth?

 

[Pogo]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

Where's your proof of a hate crime, big mouth?

I haven't alleged one.

But you've alleged the reverse. That's why you're on the spot.

 

[S.J.]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

Where's your proof of a hate crime, big mouth?

I haven't alleged one.

But you've alleged the reverse. That's why you're on the spot.

I'm not on the spot. The burden of proof is on the accuser. The muslim (accuser) hasn't provided any proof and never will, nor will you, dickwad.

 

[bucs90]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

You just asked for a link to nothing. How does one link to something that doesn't exist? It's come to this huh?

View attachment 68489

I asked for a link to a negative. The one the poster proclaimed. Same one you proclaimed a week ago.

How'd that work out for ya?

You said a link to "none". Anything asking for a definite confirmation of a "negative" is simple. Absence of evidence of the affirmative IS THE evidence of the negative.

You'd be a shitty lawyer Pogo. Your prosecution would be to demand the defendant prove he didn't commit a crime....despite no evidence he DID commit it.

Moron.

 

[Pogo]

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

Where's your proof of a hate crime, big mouth?

I haven't alleged one.

But you've alleged the reverse. That's why you're on the spot.

I'm not on the spot. The burden of proof is on the accuser. The muslim (accuser) hasn't provided any proof and never will, nor will you, dickwad.

No, not here. This is a message board --- the burden of proof is on the asserter. And that would be you. You and Sucksoff90 there.

The incident itself is outside the scope of this message board. That proof is his problem. But you guys were the asshats who categorically insist it did NOT happen.

Sooooooo .... you need to prove that negative.
And that's been the case for a full week now.

Have fun.

 

[bucs90]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

God damn your an idiot.

A report of WHAT??? A hate crime.

We called bullshit.

To this very moment....there is still 0% of a hate crime. None.

 

[bucs90]

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

Where's your proof of a hate crime, big mouth?

I haven't alleged one.

But you've alleged the reverse. That's why you're on the spot.

I'm not on the spot. The burden of proof is on the accuser. The muslim (accuser) hasn't provided any proof and never will, nor will you, dickwad.

No, not here. This is a message board --- the burden of proof is on the asserter. And that would be you. You and Sucksoff90 there.

The incident itself is outside the scope of this message board. That proof is his problem. But you guys were the asshats who categorically insist it did NOT happen.

Sooooooo .... you need to prove that negative.
And that's been the case for a full week now.

Have fun.

Again......

- The OP was to a report of a hate crime
- We called bullshit
- There is no evidence a hate crime occurred

- You demand we PROVE one didn't happen
- The evidence we present is the ABSENCE OF evidence one DID happen

If we tried this in a court of law....the jury would side with us in about a 45 second deliberation.

 

[Pogo]

You said a link to "none". Anything asking for a definite confirmation of a "negative" is simple. Absence of evidence of the affirmative IS THE evidence of the negative.

No, it absolutely is not.
I'll return to the same example I posted earlier. Get ready to go "humma humma"....

I am wearing a red shirt.
I will not post a picture of myself wearing a red shirt

Now prove I am NOT wearing a red shirt.
aaaaaand GO.

You'd be a shitty lawyer Pogo. Your prosecution would be to demand the defendant prove he didn't commit a crime....despite no evidence he DID commit it.

I see you've never been in court.

If there's no evidence he DID commit the crime --- then there is no case.
That does not mean "he didn't". It means there is no case that he did.

This is all sailing blithely over your pointy little hood, huh?

Anyway -- you don't go to court to prove a negative. But a negative IS exactly what you guys are asserting. You could have rested with the absence of a positive but noooooooo.... you went out on a limb, and now you want to deny you're on it. Classic.

Actually I already work with a lawyer who sends me narratives to revise for logic and clarity.
Can you tell?

 

[Pogo]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

God damn your an idiot.

A report of WHAT??? A hate crime.

We called bullshit.

To this very moment....there is still 0% of a hate crime. None.

That's true.
Unfortunately you went out on a limb declaring it did NOT happen.
That was a bridge too far.
Now look where you are.

Dumbass.

- You demand we PROVE one didn't happen

That's true.
And can your tiny little mind figure out WHY I demand you prove it didn't?
Time's up. Because that's exactly what you claimed.

oopsie.

So --- your proof?

 

[S.J.]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

God damn your an idiot.

A report of WHAT??? A hate crime.

We called bullshit.

To this very moment....there is still 0% of a hate crime. None.

That's true.
Unfortunately you went out on a limb declaring it did NOT happen.
That was a bridge too far.
Now look where you are.

Dumbass.

He's sitting at his computer laughing at you (as am I) trying to convince everyone a hate crime occurred and failing miserably.

 

[bucs90]

You said a link to "none". Anything asking for a definite confirmation of a "negative" is simple. Absence of evidence of the affirmative IS THE evidence of the negative.

No, it absolutely is not.
I'll return to the same example I posted earlier. Get ready to go "humma humma"....

I am wearing a red shirt.
I will not post a picture of myself wearing a red shirt

Now prove I am NOT wearing a red shirt.
aaaaaand GO.

You'd be a shitty lawyer Pogo. Your prosecution would be to demand the defendant prove he didn't commit a crime....despite no evidence he DID commit it.

I see you've never been in court.

If there's no evidence he DID commit the crime --- then there is no case.
That does not mean "he didn't". It means there is no case that he did.

This is all sailing blithely over your pointy little hood, huh?

So your response is......just assume the Mexican who started the fight is telling the truth without any evidence???

So you're talking total trust. Assume everything someone says must be true if you can't disprove it...even if it sounds absurd??

Ok. Fair enough.....I'll note this next time a cop says a thug went for his gun and you lefties say he's lying. PROVE it. PROVE Mike Brown had his hands up and prove Mike Brown didn't do everything Darren Wilson said!

Oh....now it's different right?

 

[bucs90]

claiming a racial incident when there was none.

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

God damn your an idiot.

A report of WHAT??? A hate crime.

We called bullshit.

To this very moment....there is still 0% of a hate crime. None.

That's true.
Unfortunately you went out on a limb declaring it did NOT happen.
That was a bridge too far.
Now look where you are.

Dumbass.

- You demand we PROVE one didn't happen

That's true.
And can your tiny little mind figure out WHY I demand you prove it didn't?
Time's up. Because that's exactly what you claimed.

oopsie.

So --- your proof?

It didnt.

If my neighbor says he was abducted by a UFO and played strip poker with Tupac, Elvis and Marilyn Monroe on the planet Nibiru......do I have to prove he's lying???

 

[Pogo]

Link to this "none"?


No?


We'll check back next week. You keep working on it.

Such a cat toy...

The OP claims it was a racial incident. You just keep insisting on making yourself look stupid.

The OP merely cites a report claiming that. You just declared (again) that it didn't.
Your proof is where?
Same place as the plaintiff's?

Are you guys just too fuckin' dense to understand what a "negative" is?

God damn your an idiot.

A report of WHAT??? A hate crime.

We called bullshit.

To this very moment....there is still 0% of a hate crime. None.

That's true.
Unfortunately you went out on a limb declaring it did NOT happen.
That was a bridge too far.
Now look where you are.

Dumbass.

- You demand we PROVE one didn't happen

That's true.
And can your tiny little mind figure out WHY I demand you prove it didn't?
Time's up. Because that's exactly what you claimed.

oopsie.

So --- your proof?

It didnt.

If my neighbor says he was abducted by a UFO and played strip poker with Tupac, Elvis and Marilyn Monroe on the planet Nibiru......do I have to prove he's lying???

If you SAY he's lying --- yes.
If you simply refuse to believe him -- no.