#OpTrump (Anon)

[Never3ndr]

Anon is a pretty large and fractured organization nowadays. One of its many branches is looking to revive #OpTrump. Just thought it would be an interesting share.



As a side note, dat intro doe.

 

[MisterBeale]

I had no idea Anonymous was being banking rolled by the establishment and the banking elites. Here I thought that Anonymous viewed THEM as the mortal enemies, not a political outsider like Trump.

Since when did Anonymous start falling for MSM spin and indoctrination? That's a hoot.

Ever since Anonymous "attacked" ISIS, I haven't really thought much of them. I think they are a cointelpro of the establishment in order for the secret ops to claim plausible deniability.

This way, when ever the administration wants to attack it's enemies, be they Russia, N. Kora, China, what have you, they can do so through this group and just claim it wasn't them.

This is government sponsored.

Anyone that knows what is going on, KNOWS that ISIS is supported and funded by our own government, Turkey, the Saudis, et. al., so when Anonymous claims it is attacking it, they may as well say they are attacking the US government. Well, why not?

Either they ARE the government, or they are supremely politically naive.

 

[MisterBeale]

Yeah, and the intro SHOULD be your tip off. . . .

 

[EverCurious]

hmm and two years ago they were yelling at Obama for not following through with his promises. Now they're turning against everything they yelled at Obama for? And not listening to the actual video's of Trumps speeches (rather than just the sound bytes)?

I read in the comments that there was a spoof Anon group too? Are Anon losing power and now they can't shut down spoofers on the internet?

Shits changing.

 

[Never3ndr]

I had no idea Anonymous was being banking rolled by the establishment and the banking elites. Here I thought that Anonymous viewed THEM as the mortal enemies, not a political outsider like Trump.

Since when did Anonymous start falling for MSM spin and indoctrination? That's a hoot.

Ever since Anonymous "attacked" ISIS, I haven't really thought much of them. I think they are a cointelpro of the establishment in order for the secret ops to claim plausible deniability.

This way, when ever the administration wants to attack it's enemies, be they Russia, N. Kora, China, what have you, they can do so through this group and just claim it wasn't them.

This is government sponsored.

Anyone that knows what is going on, KNOWS that ISIS is supported and funded by our own government, Turkey, the Saudis, et. al., so when Anonymous claims it is attacking it, they may as well say they are attacking the US government. Well, why not?

Either they ARE the government, or they are supremely politically naive.

As an FYI, Anon used to be (at least to my knowledge) a large, but dedicated group of hackivists. However, due to growing popularity, it kinda exploded into a huge umbrella-like banner under which a lot of different groups calling themselves "anon" act. Usually when "anon" makes a call for an operation, it actually originates from a particular group considering itself part of anon, and the message release is more to try and unite other factions of anon under its banner to achieve its goal. This is why (as is indicated in the video) you can see anon both be super powerful, or devolve into a bunch of in-fighting. It is a bunch of people that don't know each other that may or may not work together depending on their views. People in anon tend to be critical of mainstream media sources and try and delve into their own investigations of the matter, I know that Trump uses his personal propaganda machine to discredit any media source that speaks ill of him as MSM or corrupt...fortunately, there are enough unbiased sources out there to realize the guy is a legitimate danger.

BTW, if the government uses cyber attacks against foreign nations, which, I assure it has done, and is doing right now, it is not going to give access to a group of unknowns across the globe (anon is far from an American organization...its global). It keeps its stuff in-house which it why we have to have in-house whistleblowers (like Snowden) to really have a grasp on what they are doing.

Also, just because a large international organization doesn't support your candidate, doesn't make it politically naive...that doesn't even make sense.

 

[Slyhunter]

Anon is probably bought and paid for by the Chinese.

 

[EverCurious]

I realize they're global, but its not like them to double speak, or at least not the anon I knew before. Shrug

Also no shit we're cyber attacking, go check out NORSE you can see the global cyber battle that goes on every single day.

 

[Never3ndr]

hmm and two years ago they were yelling at Obama for not following through with his promises. Now they're turning against everything they yelled at Obama for? And not listening to the actual video's of Trumps speeches (rather than just the sound bytes)?

I read in the comments that there was a spoof Anon group too? Are Anon losing power and now they can't shut down spoofers on the internet?

Shits changing.

I stated this in the previous post, but anon is a pretty large organization of different groups of hacktivists across the globe. It is why they can have in-fighting and somewhat contradictory goals at times, however, as a broad basis, they tend to be pretty anti-establishment / anti-government, which is why politicians or people in authority-type positions tend to be favorite targets of theirs, regardless of political affiliation.

 

[EverCurious]

Except Trump isn't establishment... Maybe they're on the OWS kick, though idk back in the day they were in the money and tended toward sound fiscal policies. W/E, their call for attack on ISIS was rather uneventful, we'll see if they can do anything to Trump.

 

[Never3ndr]

Except Trump isn't establishment... Maybe they're on the OWS kick, though idk back in the day they were in the money and tended toward sound fiscal policies. W/E, their call for attack on ISIS was rather uneventful, we'll see if they can do anything to Trump.

If you don't think that Trump is a power-hungry maniac that is threatening to have ties to not only big business, but now to running the government of one of the most powerful nations in the world...I'm not really sure how much more of a governmental / establishment threat you can get. I mean look at the last guy who had ties to big business, Bush Jr. (through his father)...America literally forced their way into a 2nd Iraq war for no reason other than to apparently line the pockets of Dick Cheney. Another big business President might just be the tipping point for a third world war.

 

[EverCurious]

As opposed to what, the crony capitalism we've had for decades?

Or are you a Bernie socialist?

 

[Never3ndr]

As opposed to what, the crony capitalism we've had for decades?

Or are you a Bernie socialist?

I'm a democrat, and, currently given the choice between Bernie or Hillary, yes, I support Bernie. That doesn't mean that I agree with all of his policies...but...I mean come on, he's running against Hillary. I don't really have a good second option here. Honestly, if I could pick any candidate, I'd would have liked to see McCain run again sans Palin.

If I were to define my political leanings, I'd say I'm more of a moderate left-winger as I certainly hold left wing ideals, but I also hold some conservative ones or needle the fence on others.

 

[EverCurious]

mmhmm

And I have Cruz who want to get rid of SSM, Sander's who will economically destroy the country, Hilary is a lying bitch, the business man Trump, or I write in Chris Keniston.

Welcome to not belonging to a party btw, I've been there for over 30 years - you don't get everything you want so you have to decide what's most important. For me it's economic policy and national safety. For you it's ((what? What does Sander's offer other than free socialist shit? Not Hillary? lol)

W/E the peeps will vote and that will be that. It's just sad to see the constitution thrown away for free shit. I feel for the sacrifices my family has made to protect it, but there is no other choice... I could move and lose them or stay and lose them, I'm not sure it even matters anymore. Maybe we'll get Sanders and folks will remember how bad socialism is ~shrug~

 

[Never3ndr]

mmhmm

And I have Cruz who want to get rid of SSM, Sander's who will economically destroy the country, Hilary is a lying bitch, the business man Trump, or I write in Chris Keniston.

Welcome to not belonging to a party btw, I've been there for over 30 years - you don't get everything you want so you have to decide what's most important. For me it's economic policy and national safety. For you it's ((what? What does Sander's offer other than free socialist shit? Not Hillary? lol)

W/E the peeps will vote and that will be that. It's just sad to see the constitution thrown away for free shit. I feel for the sacrifices my family has made to protect it, but there is no other choice... I could move and lose them or stay and lose them, I'm not sure it even matters anymore. Maybe we'll get Sanders and folks will remember how bad socialism is ~shrug~

The general election is usually seen as a race to the middle. To be fair to Trump, he already seems to be posturing for this. His last debate he seemed almost sane. I'm usually the last one to write somebody off due solely to party alliance, so, if he actually does continue to present himself as a normal human being, I don't mind actually legitimately considering him.

However, if he continues acting as he does in the past, I'll continue to view him as a highly dangerous candidate to our nation that can, in a worst case scenario, be a potential cause for a Civil War if we consider that he controls the majority of the resources in the Executive Branch and, at least right now, it appears that the Legislative Branch, as a whole, will by totally charged against him giving a lot of people some reason to perhaps bear arms.

 

[EverCurious]

Just don't forget to keep the anti-freedom of speech actions of the Sander's crowd

 

[Never3ndr]

Just don't forget to keep the anti-freedom of speech actions of the Sander's crowd

Did you really lump me in with a bunch of extremists based off of whom I supported? Would you feel better if I supported Hillary? When have I given you the inclination that I don't believe in free speech...that's literally ridiculous.

 

[EverCurious]

Just a reminder because the media is completely ignoring it.

 

[MisterBeale]

I had no idea Anonymous was being banking rolled by the establishment and the banking elites. Here I thought that Anonymous viewed THEM as the mortal enemies, not a political outsider like Trump.

Since when did Anonymous start falling for MSM spin and indoctrination? That's a hoot.

Ever since Anonymous "attacked" ISIS, I haven't really thought much of them. I think they are a cointelpro of the establishment in order for the secret ops to claim plausible deniability.

This way, when ever the administration wants to attack it's enemies, be they Russia, N. Kora, China, what have you, they can do so through this group and just claim it wasn't them.

This is government sponsored.

Anyone that knows what is going on, KNOWS that ISIS is supported and funded by our own government, Turkey, the Saudis, et. al., so when Anonymous claims it is attacking it, they may as well say they are attacking the US government. Well, why not?

Either they ARE the government, or they are supremely politically naive.

As an FYI, Anon used to be (at least to my knowledge) a large, but dedicated group of hackivists. However, due to growing popularity, it kinda exploded into a huge umbrella-like banner under which a lot of different groups calling themselves "anon" act. Usually when "anon" makes a call for an operation, it actually originates from a particular group considering itself part of anon, and the message release is more to try and unite other factions of anon under its banner to achieve its goal. This is why (as is indicated in the video) you can see anon both be super powerful, or devolve into a bunch of in-fighting. It is a bunch of people that don't know each other that may or may not work together depending on their views. People in anon tend to be critical of mainstream media sources and try and delve into their own investigations of the matter, I know that Trump uses his personal propaganda machine to discredit any media source that speaks ill of him as MSM or corrupt...fortunately, there are enough unbiased sources out there to realize the guy is a legitimate danger.

BTW, if the government uses cyber attacks against foreign nations, which, I assure it has done, and is doing right now, it is not going to give access to a group of unknowns across the globe (anon is far from an American organization...its global). It keeps its stuff in-house which it why we have to have in-house whistleblowers (like Snowden) to really have a grasp on what they are doing.

Also, just because a large international organization doesn't support your candidate, doesn't make it politically naive...that doesn't even make sense.

I don't have a candidate. I support Anarchy, anything that is out of STATE control, and in the people's direct control.

Trump is as ignorant and misinformed about what is going on as anon.


On this issue, I would say, if I did care to vote, it would probably be Jill Stein. But what are her chances? She is the only one that thinks Snowden is a hero.

Only One Presidential Candidate Supports Edward Snowden, And It’s Not Bernie Sanders
Unlike the Green Party’s Jill Stein, not one Republican or Democratic nominee has voiced any support for the NSA whistleblower or shown any willingness to allow him to return to the U.S. as a free man.
Only One Presidential Candidate Supports Edward Snowden, And It’s Not Bernie Sanders

 

[MisterBeale]

Except Trump isn't establishment... Maybe they're on the OWS kick, though idk back in the day they were in the money and tended toward sound fiscal policies. W/E, their call for attack on ISIS was rather uneventful, we'll see if they can do anything to Trump.

If you don't think that Trump is a power-hungry maniac that is threatening to have ties to not only big business, but now to running the government of one of the most powerful nations in the world...I'm not really sure how much more of a governmental / establishment threat you can get. I mean look at the last guy who had ties to big business, Bush Jr. (through his father)...America literally forced their way into a 2nd Iraq war for no reason other than to apparently line the pockets of Dick Cheney. Another big business President might just be the tipping point for a third world war.

Wow kid.

You really don't know anything about politics.

Trump and Bush could not be more different.

Do you even know anything about the CFR and neo-cons?

Trump has more in common with the mafia than he does big business and the fascist powers that the Bush family had connections to.

 

[Never3ndr]

Wow kid.

You really don't know anything about politics.

Trump and Bush could not be more different.

Do you even know anything about the CFR and neo-cons?

Trump has more in common with the mafia than he does big business and the fascist powers that the Bush family had connections to.

Funny enough, I've actually heard rumors that Trump had significant ties to the mafia during the 80's. However, I haven't seen anything reliable / provable, so those may only be rumors.

I'll be quite honest, I do not know much about the CFR, if you want to link me to how it pertains to this discussion I don't mind being educated.

On neo-cons, like Cheney, I don't claim to be an expert, but I am aware of them and their general political stance. I'm not sure what that has to do with Trump however. If you say that Trump isn't a neo-con and, therefore, wouldn't replicate their actions, my counter is simple...you don't know that. We have no clue what Trump will do in presidency. What we do know is that he has shown a markedly significant self interest and he couples that with a large propaganda machine that fuels his fiction-rather-than-fact based claims. This gives us reason to believe that we cannot rely on him to carry out his campaign claims, but we can rely on him to act in self-interest. With that knowledge it is not unreasonable to assume that when you give a guy control of the world's most dangerous army, that he won't mind using it to fuel his own ends and line his own pockets.

I'm not saying that Trump and Bush are the same, what I am saying is that doesn't mean you can't draw similarities from them.