Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In an [URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mcconnell-and-grassley-democrats-shouldnt-rob-voters-of-chance-to-replace-scalia/2016/02/18/e5ae9bdc-d68a-11e5-be55-2cc3c1e4b76b_story.html']op-ed
[/URL]published in the Washington Post on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) attempt to frame confirming any Supreme Court nominee at all over the next year as a scheme by Democrats to “rob voters of chance to replace Scalia.”
The two men — both of whom voted to confirm Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in February of the final year of his presidency — have virtually unilateral power to prevent the Senate from even considering a potential nominee: Grassley can refuse to schedule a confirmation hearing and McConnell can simply opt not to allow a vote.
While much of their article simply notes that some Democrats have also embraced obstructionism and delays in the past, the senators’ key points have been debunked by one the Senate’s most powerful Republicans: Mitch McConnell himself.
Mitch McConnell’s Arguments Against An Obama Supreme Court Nomination Debunked By McConnell
In anop-ed published in the Washington Post on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) attempt to frame confirming any Supreme Court nominee at all over the next year as a scheme by Democrats to “rob voters of chance to replace Scalia.”
The two men — both of whom voted to confirm Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in February of the final year of his presidency — have virtually unilateral power to prevent the Senate from even considering a potential nominee: Grassley can refuse to schedule a confirmation hearing and McConnell can simply opt not to allow a vote.
While much of their article simply notes that some Democrats have also embraced obstructionism and delays in the past, the senators’ key points have been debunked by one the Senate’s most powerful Republicans: Mitch McConnell himself.
Sorry Turtle man, your shit stinks.
We smell it.
Mitch McConnell’s Arguments Against An Obama Supreme Court Nomination Debunked By McConnell
In anop-ed published in the Washington Post on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) attempt to frame confirming any Supreme Court nominee at all over the next year as a scheme by Democrats to “rob voters of chance to replace Scalia.”
The two men — both of whom voted to confirm Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in February of the final year of his presidency — have virtually unilateral power to prevent the Senate from even considering a potential nominee: Grassley can refuse to schedule a confirmation hearing and McConnell can simply opt not to allow a vote.
While much of their article simply notes that some Democrats have also embraced obstructionism and delays in the past, the senators’ key points have been debunked by one the Senate’s most powerful Republicans: Mitch McConnell himself.
Sorry Turtle man, your shit stinks.
We smell it.
Mitch McConnell’s Arguments Against An Obama Supreme Court Nomination Debunked By McConnell
In anop-ed published in the Washington Post on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) attempt to frame confirming any Supreme Court nominee at all over the next year as a scheme by Democrats to “rob voters of chance to replace Scalia.”
The two men — both of whom voted to confirm Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in February of the final year of his presidency — have virtually unilateral power to prevent the Senate from even considering a potential nominee: Grassley can refuse to schedule a confirmation hearing and McConnell can simply opt not to allow a vote.
While much of their article simply notes that some Democrats have also embraced obstructionism and delays in the past, the senators’ key points have been debunked by one the Senate’s most powerful Republicans: Mitch McConnell himself.
Sorry Turtle man, your shit stinks.
We smell it.
What EXACTLY is your point? Harry Reid has been the most obstructionist man the Senate has ever seen. Look - you are NOT gonna get your limp-wristed liberal judge. it ain't happening. So, rather than keeping your panties in a wad - get over it.
you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or Bernie
Mitch McConnell’s Arguments Against An Obama Supreme Court Nomination Debunked By McConnell
In anop-ed published in the Washington Post on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) attempt to frame confirming any Supreme Court nominee at all over the next year as a scheme by Democrats to “rob voters of chance to replace Scalia.”
The two men — both of whom voted to confirm Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in February of the final year of his presidency — have virtually unilateral power to prevent the Senate from even considering a potential nominee: Grassley can refuse to schedule a confirmation hearing and McConnell can simply opt not to allow a vote.
While much of their article simply notes that some Democrats have also embraced obstructionism and delays in the past, the senators’ key points have been debunked by one the Senate’s most powerful Republicans: Mitch McConnell himself.
Sorry Turtle man, your shit stinks.
We smell it.
What EXACTLY is your point? Harry Reid has been the most obstructionist man the Senate has ever seen. Look - you are NOT gonna get your limp-wristed liberal judge. it ain't happening. So, rather than keeping your panties in a wad - get over it.
If you don't want the moderate that Obama nominates, you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or Bernie. You might want to rethink your position.
you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or BernieMitch McConnell’s Arguments Against An Obama Supreme Court Nomination Debunked By McConnell
In anop-ed published in the Washington Post on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) attempt to frame confirming any Supreme Court nominee at all over the next year as a scheme by Democrats to “rob voters of chance to replace Scalia.”
The two men — both of whom voted to confirm Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in February of the final year of his presidency — have virtually unilateral power to prevent the Senate from even considering a potential nominee: Grassley can refuse to schedule a confirmation hearing and McConnell can simply opt not to allow a vote.
While much of their article simply notes that some Democrats have also embraced obstructionism and delays in the past, the senators’ key points have been debunked by one the Senate’s most powerful Republicans: Mitch McConnell himself.
Sorry Turtle man, your shit stinks.
We smell it.
What EXACTLY is your point? Harry Reid has been the most obstructionist man the Senate has ever seen. Look - you are NOT gonna get your limp-wristed liberal judge. it ain't happening. So, rather than keeping your panties in a wad - get over it.
If you don't want the moderate that Obama nominates, you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or Bernie. You might want to rethink your position.
They need to win the election to be able to do that.
you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or BernieMitch McConnell’s Arguments Against An Obama Supreme Court Nomination Debunked By McConnell
In anop-ed published in the Washington Post on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) attempt to frame confirming any Supreme Court nominee at all over the next year as a scheme by Democrats to “rob voters of chance to replace Scalia.”
The two men — both of whom voted to confirm Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in February of the final year of his presidency — have virtually unilateral power to prevent the Senate from even considering a potential nominee: Grassley can refuse to schedule a confirmation hearing and McConnell can simply opt not to allow a vote.
While much of their article simply notes that some Democrats have also embraced obstructionism and delays in the past, the senators’ key points have been debunked by one the Senate’s most powerful Republicans: Mitch McConnell himself.
Sorry Turtle man, your shit stinks.
We smell it.
What EXACTLY is your point? Harry Reid has been the most obstructionist man the Senate has ever seen. Look - you are NOT gonna get your limp-wristed liberal judge. it ain't happening. So, rather than keeping your panties in a wad - get over it.
If you don't want the moderate that Obama nominates, you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or Bernie. You might want to rethink your position.
They need to win the election to be able to do that.
Don't see that as a problem.Republicans don't even like the republican candidates.
you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or BernieMitch McConnell’s Arguments Against An Obama Supreme Court Nomination Debunked By McConnell
Sorry Turtle man, your shit stinks.
We smell it.
What EXACTLY is your point? Harry Reid has been the most obstructionist man the Senate has ever seen. Look - you are NOT gonna get your limp-wristed liberal judge. it ain't happening. So, rather than keeping your panties in a wad - get over it.
If you don't want the moderate that Obama nominates, you really won't want the liberal nominated by Hillary or Bernie. You might want to rethink your position.
They need to win the election to be able to do that.
Don't see that as a problem.Republicans don't even like the republican candidates.
Long way to November.
YOu may not end up with either one of them
I see no reason to believe either one will end up In the White House, for more than a visit
I see no reason to believe either one will end up In the White House, for more than a visit
As long as you stay in that right wing bubble you won't see until it is too late.
