Liberals Just Lost the Supreme Court for Decades to Come

Just imagine the red swing that will take place if Trump deports millions of illegals and locks down the border. I know supposedly illegals aren't voting, but I would be willing to bet the numbers will be down for Democrats in 2028...just coincidently of course.

Also hoping that Trump will take steps top secure elections. This 1 month long counting stuff is ridiculous as is mass mail-in balloting.
 
The founders didn’t envision just 2 parties or that people would be so ideological captured by them.

They had several factions, which amounts to the same thing. The Federalists were divided among 3 or so, while Jefferson's 'Democratic Republicans' bloc was fairly solid. Jefferson's faction had the Evangelicals' mid-Atlantic states' vote locked up
 
He is a brilliant man and a devout Catholic. If he can be a two-termer and conservatives control everything for the next 12 years
From your lips to God's ears, but this has never happened in my lifetime. We'll be lucky to get 8 years before the American people become fickle and grow tired. They'll once again forget what the Democrats did and will again fall for their propaganda.

8 years, if were lucky. No party has held the presidency for 3 terms in my lifetime
 
Just imagine the red swing that will take place if Trump deports millions of illegals and locks down the border. I know supposedly illegals aren't voting, but I would be willing to bet the numbers will be down for Democrats in 2028...just coincidently of course.

Also hoping that Trump will take steps top secure elections. This 1 month long counting stuff is ridiculous as is mass mail-in balloting.
Not only the illegals but the hysterical American libs who will self deport. Add to that the millions who will suffer heart attacks and stroke the day he is sworn in 😂
 
The Supreme Court became a running joke a long time ago; Lincoln and the Republicans broke it completely, and it became a cess pool of corruption after Taney died in 1864. No PArty ever nominates non-partisan judges or any who pretend to be.
 
Last edited:
Do you think s Supreme Court is meant to be stacked with ONE Party rule? Is that what our founders envisioned?
Do you want to amend the Constitution? The sitting president appoints them.

The Democrat Party encouraged your president to ADD TO the Supreme Court for that very reason
 
Do you think s Supreme Court is meant to be stacked with ONE Party rule? Is that what our founders envisioned?
How will you stop it?

If the left had its wish there would be no conservatives on the court

Instead it could be as the op suggests

Bummer, huh?
 
I would hope to have a national ban at the 12-week stage, or by the end of the first trimester. That’s plenty of time for a woman to realize she’s pregnant, and provide her with several weeks to decide.

No national ban unless you get an amendment passed.

You can't hand it to the states and take it back. It does not work that way.
 
Do you think s Supreme Court is meant to be stacked with ONE Party rule? Is that what our founders envisioned?

They never envisioned a court that would be politically addled like the current one.

It was to be a separate group that only did one thing....adjudicate challenges to the U.S. Constitution.

No activist bulls**t like Roe.

But the left has been using he courts for 60 years to get what they can't get by popular vote.

And so you now have it.

The founders would probably hang those assholes on the left who started us down this road.

Well.....that might include FDR who only wanted to pack the court and then appointed judges who allowed s**t that was clearly unconstitutional.
 
Judicial activism started with the Civil War Court packing by Lincoln, and continued throughout the rest of the Republican dominated century and into the Hoover administration. Of course Republicans like to pretend they didn't set the precedent and continue to blame FDR for merely following their own example.
 
From your lips to God's ears, but this has never happened in my lifetime. We'll be lucky to get 8 years before the American people become fickle and grow tired. They'll once again forget what the Democrats did and will again fall for their propaganda.

8 years, if were lucky. No party has held the presidency for 3 terms in my lifetime
Reagan and Bush 43 did it. How old are you?
 
Libs should be rejoicing about Trump's Triumph last month in regards to the Supreme Court. They will finally be rid of Clarence Thomas, after a quest of over 30 years to dispose of the Jackie Robinson of the Supreme Court, the man who broke the liberal color barrier.

How about replacing Thomas with Matt Gaetz? or perhaps Ted Cruz as the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice?
 
Reagan and Bush 43 did it. How old are you?
You didn't think this through.
Reagan was a Two termer.
Then Bush 41
Then Clinton two terms
Then Bush 43 two terms
Probably older than you, but I tell people I'm 25 😉
 
Libs should be rejoicing about Trump's Triumph last month in regards to the Supreme Court. They will finally be rid of Clarence Thomas, after a quest of over 30 years to dispose of the Jackie Robinson of the Supreme Court, the man who broke the liberal color barrier.

How about replacing Thomas with Matt Gaetz? or perhaps Ted Cruz as the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice?

Cruz could probably handle the job. Gaetz isn't SC material.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom