Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy – even in cases of violence

[playtime]

Your response is silly.

how so? if a woman has to stay married, then every thing her spouse does can affect her, financially to criminality.

 

[martybegan]

I just read about it. Makes you wonder what other shit still lurks out of sight.
America is held back by anti women laws.

It's because Dems think they can use this with regards to abortion.

At least be honest about it.

 

[martybegan]

Probably because people are just finding out about it, not everyone knows 100% of the divorce laws in every state.

It's because the abortion freaks think it's another hammer in their toolbelt.

 

[martybegan]

how so? if a woman has to stay married, then every thing her spouse does can affect her, financially to criminality.

it also seals in the guys responsibility for the child as said child is born before the divorce is finalized.

Not just the biological parent, but the legal parent as well.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It's because the abortion freaks think it's another hammer in their toolbelt.

And? it does show how backwards some states are in regards to women.

 

[initforme]

Missouri is not wanting people to get married. So let's hope less do that there.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

And? it does show how backwards some states are in regards to women.

Like allowing biological males to compete against biological females?

Careful

 

[Auld Phart]

I just read about it. Makes you wonder what other shit still lurks out of sight.
America is held back by anti women laws.

Makes you wonder what other shit still lurks out of sight.

find a copy of the book, "the Trenton Pickle Ordinance."

it lists hundreds of laws, still on the books of totally insane laws.

(BTW, the Trenton Pickle Ordinance made it illegal to pour pickle juice on trolly tracks)

 

[martybegan]

And? it does show how backwards some states are in regards to women.

Or how they want to make sure men can't duck out of being legally the father of a child.

 

[surada]

Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy â even in cases of violence

The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

www.theguardian.com

Again we see the law of unintended consequenccs. Why are there no exceptions to this nonsense ? Why is it so important for little men to control every aspect of womens lives. ?

Maybe the dark underbelly of US life should be cleansed by sunlight ?
And dragged out of the dark ages.

That's barbaric.

 

[surada]

There is.

It's called the right to freedom of association.

Stuff like this is what happens when you give the State jurisdiction over your marriage (and consequently your household) by way of that whole marriage ''license'' thing.
View attachment 917533

The State is not a party to the marriage contract.

 

[martybegan]

The State is not a party to the marriage contract.

The State issues the marriage contract you dolt.

That makes it a party to it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The State is not a party to the marriage contract.

Who issues the license? LOL

 

[surada]

The State issues the marriage contract you dolt.

That makes it a party to it.

You haven't studied domestic law. The State is not a party to the contract. People marry each other. All the State does is register the contract.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

how so? if a woman has to stay married, then every thing her spouse does can affect her, financially to criminality.

Not when they are separated. Hell, a divorce case involving issues of child support/custody, property division, etc… will probably take over a year anyway. Moreover, and this will probably come as a shock to you, the woman can get a restraining order against her husband. It happens all the time.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You haven't studied domestic law. The State is not a party to the contract. People marry each other. All the State does is register the contract.

A state employee can perform a marriage ceremony. You should study up on laws

 

[Tommy Tainant]

It's because the abortion freaks think it's another hammer in their toolbelt.

I hope so.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Like allowing biological males to compete against biological females?

Careful

Fully against that. That is the nice part of not being a partisan drone, I can be against both of these things

 

[jknowgood]

Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy â even in cases of violence

The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

www.theguardian.com

Again we see the law of unintended consequenccs. Why are there no exceptions to this nonsense ? Why is it so important for little men to control every aspect of womens lives. ?

Maybe the dark underbelly of US life should be cleansed by sunlight ?
And dragged out of the dark ages.

I know we are letting men dominate in women's sports.

 

[martybegan]

You haven't studied domestic law. The State is not a party to the contract. People marry each other. All the State does is register the contract.

That makes them part of the contract. It's why they have special jurisdictions in special courts.