Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy – even in cases of violence

[Tommy Tainant]

Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy â even in cases of violence

The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

www.theguardian.com

Again we see the law of unintended consequenccs. Why are there no exceptions to this nonsense ? Why is it so important for little men to control every aspect of womens lives. ?

Maybe the dark underbelly of US life should be cleansed by sunlight ?
And dragged out of the dark ages.

 

[playtime]

they are nothing but fucking backwards hayseed hillbilly christofascists.

it wasn't until the late 70's when the act of raping your wife became illegal in all 50 states, but was still defined differently in the law books according to how much a knuckle dragging state wanted to evolve.

 

[martybegan]

Missouri law prevents divorce during pregnancy â even in cases of violence

The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

www.theguardian.com

Again we see the law of unintended consequenccs. Why are there no exceptions to this nonsense ? Why is it so important for little men to control every aspect of womens lives. ?

Maybe the dark underbelly of US life should be cleansed by sunlight ?
And dragged out of the dark ages.

The original intent of the statute in Missouri, which originated in 1973, was “noble”, Ashley Aune, a Democratic representative, said, as it tried to ensure that a mother and her child were provided for by settling custody arrangements and child support after the child’s birth.

The intent was to prevent deadbeat dads from ducking out on their responsibilities for children they had parented.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The intent was to prevent deadbeat dads from ducking out on their responsibilities for children they had parented.

Outdated law but I see your point. No reason a woman can't leave an abusive relationship

 

[martybegan]

Outdated law but I see your point. No reason a woman can't leave an abusive relationship

The thing is it's been sold as some new law thought up by the abortion restrictions side by the abortion at any time side.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The intent was to prevent deadbeat dads from ducking out on their responsibilities for children they had parented.

They could have dome that by enforcing maintenance laws, But that would have released women from bondage.
Its a law passed by blokes with small cocks.

 

[martybegan]

They could have dome that by enforcing maintenance laws, But that would have released women from bondage.
Its a law passed by blokes with small cocks.

You do know the law is from 1973, right?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

They could have dome that by enforcing maintenance laws, But that would have released women from bondage.
Its a law passed by blokes with small cocks.

You had no part in passing that law

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You do know the law is from 1973, right?

When was it abolished ?

 

[martybegan]

When was it abolished ?

Why is it a sudden concern?

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Just because you have to stay married does not mean you have to stay with the abuser.. The state legislature felt that legitimation was a strong public policy concern.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why is it a sudden concern?

Probably because people are just finding out about it, not everyone knows 100% of the divorce laws in every state.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Why is it a sudden concern?

I just read about it. Makes you wonder what other shit still lurks out of sight.
America is held back by anti women laws.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I just read about it. Makes you wonder what other shit still lurks out of sight.
America is held back by anti women laws.

Yeah... Your good King Henry was...lol

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Yeah... Your good King Henry was...lol

Why do you oppose rights for women ?

 

[playtime]

Just because you have to stay married does not mean you have to stay with the abuser..

but you are legally tethered to a person you no longer should be.

by force.

The state legislature felt that legitimation was a strong public policy concern.

but but but - a child born to an 'unmarried' female is somehow less legit? i thought that every 'child' from the moment of conception is so so so very precious.

just not the legit ones?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

but you are legally tethered to a person you no longer should be.

by force.





but but but - a child born to an 'unmarried' female is somehow less legit? i thought that every 'child' from the moment of conception is so so so very precious.

just not the legit ones?

Every child is precious. Stop killing them in the womb

 

[Natural Citizen]

Why are there no exceptions to this nonsense ?

There is.

It's called the right to freedom of association.

Stuff like this is what happens when you give the State jurisdiction over your marriage (and consequently your household) by way of that whole marriage ''license'' thing.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

but you are legally tethered to a person you no longer should be.

by force.





but but but - a child born to an 'unmarried' female is somehow less legit? i thought that every 'child' from the moment of conception is so so so very precious.

just not the legit ones?

Your response is silly.

 

[playtime]

Every child is precious.

'cept when raising taxes to take care of them.

Stop killing them in the womb

start electing people who will make sure they thrive after birth.