MILITIAS - The CONSTITUTIONAL means of dealing with government tyranny and over reach

What's more important is what the CONSTITUTION means.

If you lack an understanding of world history and the context of world events at the time, obviously you will be unable to understand the true intent and purpose of not only the Constitution, but also the 2nd Amendment.

The corrupt public education system has LONG indoctrinated young people to misinterpret the Constitution.

If you were an independent thinker, you would abandon your leftist ways.

Stupid ... it's what SCOTUS says the Constitution means ... oh great, blame school teachers now, what a fuckwad ... free babysitting and now you complain ... when's the last time you've been to a PTA or School Board meeting ... never, Bubba too embarrassed having never finished Middle School ...
 
EVERY patriot who values their freedoms and the Constitution should reach out to and get involved in their local militia.

It doesn't take rocket science to see what's coming.

Just do your research. The left is super cunning and will no doubt set up fake militias to ensnare unsuspecting patriots.
 
What's more important is what the CONSTITUTION means.

If you lack an understanding of world history and the context of world events at the time, obviously you will be unable to understand the true intent and purpose of not only the Constitution, but also the 2nd Amendment.

The corrupt public education system has LONG indoctrinated young people to misinterpret the Constitution.

If you were an independent thinker, you would abandon your leftist ways.

Stupid ... it's what SCOTUS says the Constitution means ... oh great, blame school teachers now, what a fuckwad ... free babysitting and now you complain ... when's the last time you've been to a PTA or School Board meeting ... never, Bubba too embarrassed having never finished Middle School ...

I won't let you drag me down to your level.

If you cannot discuss without losing your mind and acting juvenile, then my discussion with you is done.
 
MOST people joining militias are not thugs but patriots wanting to preserve America and preserve freedom.

Too yellow-belly to sign up for regular military service ... hide in the backwoods scaring innocent peaceful Americans is the coward's way ... fuck that facing well armed Jihadists in the field ... turn tail and piddle yourself running away ... just like Senator Cruz shivering in the basement of the Senate ...

It was my second wife who pointed out the closest I got to combat was a whorehouse ... smart girl, should have kept her ...
 
MOST people joining militias are not thugs but patriots wanting to preserve America and preserve freedom.

Too yellow-belly to sign up for regular military service ... hide in the backwoods scaring innocent peaceful Americans is the coward's way ... fuck that facing well armed Jihadists in the field ... turn tail and piddle yourself running away ... just like Senator Cruz shivering in the basement of the Senate ...

It was my second wife who pointed out the closest I got to combat was a whorehouse ... smart girl, should have kept her ...

Thank you for your opinions. Even if I disagree.

Good night.
 
Bubba didn't make it through Middle school ... there's only four sections in Article II of the US Constitution ... you're getting bogus information from your Russian handlers ...

WTF are you talking about?
 
Bluntly states the people currently calling themselves "militias" are in fact, armed white thugs wearing cammo and para-military gear. They are not "militias". They have no function or role at all.

Paramilitaries ... just looking out for their best interests ... also called roving gangs of cold-blooded murderers ... profoundly not regulated ...

This is a dismal perception.

MOST people joining militias are not thugs but patriots wanting to preserve America and preserve freedom.

Your perception plays well into the hands of tyrants. Just know for certain that after you have helped them gain their omnipotence, you will be
discarded along with the Billy Bobs you speak of.

I had a roommate who fancied himself to be a "survivalist". Basically, him and his friends were yahoos who just like to go out and play in the woods. They were getting ready to live off the land when the shit hit the fan. These people just want an excuse to got out and play soldier.
 
Leftists who hate the constitution, we don't need militias this isn't the 1700's....let round up and arrest the Black Panthers then.......hold on lets rethink this.
 
I had a roommate who fancied himself to be a "survivalist". Basically, him and his friends were yahoos who just like to go out and play in the woods. They were getting ready to live off the land when the shit hit the fan. These people just want an excuse to got out and play soldier.

"Excuse" to play soldier in the woods ?

Yeah, sounds exactly how things were in the 1700's when the US was fighting England for it's Independence.

Americans have been lulled into a false sense of security. As if freedom is guaranteed. And you're oblivious that it could affect you too
(IFYOU ARE EVEN AMERICAN WHICH I DOUBT...PROBABLY CHINESE)

The US can and will fall just like Venezuela did if the Right continues to just do nothing.
 
Last edited:
the last thing this country needs is armed right wing death squads

The VERY last thing
 
The Militia's were under Government control to protect the nation, not to fight the government of the people.

Winning a close election is not tyranny.

A violent take over of another branch of Government timed to obstruct the counting of the EC vote, by the President who lost the vote, was an act of insurrection and treason.
 
What's more important is what the CONSTITUTION means.

If you lack an understanding of world history and the context of world events at the time, obviously you will be unable to understand the true intent and purpose of not only the Constitution, but also the 2nd Amendment.

The corrupt public education system has LONG indoctrinated young people to misinterpret the Constitution.

If you were an independent thinker, you would abandon your leftist ways.

Stupid ... it's what SCOTUS says the Constitution means ... oh great, blame school teachers now, what a fuckwad ... free babysitting and now you complain ... when's the last time you've been to a PTA or School Board meeting ... never, Bubba too embarrassed having never finished Middle School ...
Extreme feminist agendas caused this.
 
What we are saying is that your recourse is a nonviolent one. Elections.

Then why didn't the Original Colonists simply VOTE to be Independent of Great Britain ???

If they had voted, then surely England would have respected that vote according to you?
Because they didn’t have the constitution which gave them the opportunity to do so.

But now we do.

You don't need a Constitution to VOTE.
The Constitution did not give an opportunity for voting. You are confused.
You are negating your own argument. Voting has been taking place all over the world for millennia.

You stated that voting is the ultimate solution to disputes.
You were wrong.

Militias are now needed because among other things, people have decided that stealing elections to grab power is acceptable.
No, you are wrong.

The people have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances through either the political or judicial process.

If the people believe the government has overreached or acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief by filing suit in Federal court.

If the people believe an elected official has acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief via the political process by voting him out of office – just as Trump was voted out of office.


they tried that and were rejected on BS grounds,,,
They filed 60 fucking lawsuits that were all laughed out of court. Just maybe the lawsuits were bullshit and the courts all recognized it. Maybe this whole thing is a charade by Trump to keep rubes like you giving him more free money.
 
What we are saying is that your recourse is a nonviolent one. Elections.

Then why didn't the Original Colonists simply VOTE to be Independent of Great Britain ???

If they had voted, then surely England would have respected that vote according to you?
Because they didn’t have the constitution which gave them the opportunity to do so.

But now we do.

You don't need a Constitution to VOTE.
The Constitution did not give an opportunity for voting. You are confused.
You are negating your own argument. Voting has been taking place all over the world for millennia.

You stated that voting is the ultimate solution to disputes.
You were wrong.

Militias are now needed because among other things, people have decided that stealing elections to grab power is acceptable.
No, you are wrong.

The people have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances through either the political or judicial process.

If the people believe the government has overreached or acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief by filing suit in Federal court.

If the people believe an elected official has acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief via the political process by voting him out of office – just as Trump was voted out of office.


they tried that and were rejected on BS grounds,,,
They filed 60 fucking lawsuits that were all laughed out of court. Just maybe the lawsuits were bullshit and the courts all recognized it. Maybe this whole thing is a charade by Trump to keep rubes like you giving him more free money.
your letting your ignorance show,,

they were thrown out on procedure not merit,,
 
What we are saying is that your recourse is a nonviolent one. Elections.

Then why didn't the Original Colonists simply VOTE to be Independent of Great Britain ???

If they had voted, then surely England would have respected that vote according to you?
Because they didn’t have the constitution which gave them the opportunity to do so.

But now we do.

You don't need a Constitution to VOTE.
The Constitution did not give an opportunity for voting. You are confused.
You are negating your own argument. Voting has been taking place all over the world for millennia.

You stated that voting is the ultimate solution to disputes.
You were wrong.

Militias are now needed because among other things, people have decided that stealing elections to grab power is acceptable.
No, you are wrong.

The people have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances through either the political or judicial process.

If the people believe the government has overreached or acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief by filing suit in Federal court.

If the people believe an elected official has acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief via the political process by voting him out of office – just as Trump was voted out of office.


they tried that and were rejected on BS grounds,,,
They filed 60 fucking lawsuits that were all laughed out of court. Just maybe the lawsuits were bullshit and the courts all recognized it. Maybe this whole thing is a charade by Trump to keep rubes like you giving him more free money.
your letting your ignorance show,,

they were thrown out on procedure not merit,,
So repug judges, even Trump endorsed and appointed ones, require proper procedure? Trumps crack(pot) legal team couldn't file a single solitary lawsuit that followed proper procedure? Ted Cruz and the Texass hail Mary wasn't following proper procedure? All these repug lawyers don't know how to file a lawsuit - that's what you are saying?
 
What we are saying is that your recourse is a nonviolent one. Elections.

Then why didn't the Original Colonists simply VOTE to be Independent of Great Britain ???

If they had voted, then surely England would have respected that vote according to you?
Because they didn’t have the constitution which gave them the opportunity to do so.

But now we do.

You don't need a Constitution to VOTE.
The Constitution did not give an opportunity for voting. You are confused.
You are negating your own argument. Voting has been taking place all over the world for millennia.

You stated that voting is the ultimate solution to disputes.
You were wrong.

Militias are now needed because among other things, people have decided that stealing elections to grab power is acceptable.
No, you are wrong.

The people have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances through either the political or judicial process.

If the people believe the government has overreached or acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief by filing suit in Federal court.

If the people believe an elected official has acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief via the political process by voting him out of office – just as Trump was voted out of office.


they tried that and were rejected on BS grounds,,,
They filed 60 fucking lawsuits that were all laughed out of court. Just maybe the lawsuits were bullshit and the courts all recognized it. Maybe this whole thing is a charade by Trump to keep rubes like you giving him more free money.
your letting your ignorance show,,

they were thrown out on procedure not merit,,
So repug judges, even Trump endorsed and appointed ones, require proper procedure? Trumps crack(pot) legal team couldn't file a single solitary lawsuit that followed proper procedure? Ted Cruz and the Texass hail Mary wasn't following proper procedure? All these repug lawyers don't know how to file a lawsuit - that's what you are saying?
Trump's legal team knew there was no chance of overthrowing the election because election laws set the bar very high when it comes to nullifying votes. It is not sufficient to show that there were violation of regulations, nor that there could have been election fraud. The law requires that the plaintiff show that there was illegal acts that actually changed the outcome of the election.

The purpose was never to change election results but rather to keep Trump's lies claiming the election was rigged alive. Trump may have lost the election but he's been able to convince millions of Americans that the election was rigged without a shred of proof.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." And this is exactly what Trump has done.

 
Last edited:
What we are saying is that your recourse is a nonviolent one. Elections.

Then why didn't the Original Colonists simply VOTE to be Independent of Great Britain ???

If they had voted, then surely England would have respected that vote according to you?
Because they didn’t have the constitution which gave them the opportunity to do so.

But now we do.

You don't need a Constitution to VOTE.
The Constitution did not give an opportunity for voting. You are confused.
You are negating your own argument. Voting has been taking place all over the world for millennia.

You stated that voting is the ultimate solution to disputes.
You were wrong.

Militias are now needed because among other things, people have decided that stealing elections to grab power is acceptable.
No, you are wrong.

The people have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances through either the political or judicial process.

If the people believe the government has overreached or acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief by filing suit in Federal court.

If the people believe an elected official has acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief via the political process by voting him out of office – just as Trump was voted out of office.


they tried that and were rejected on BS grounds,,,
They filed 60 fucking lawsuits that were all laughed out of court. Just maybe the lawsuits were bullshit and the courts all recognized it. Maybe this whole thing is a charade by Trump to keep rubes like you giving him more free money.
your letting your ignorance show,,

they were thrown out on procedure not merit,,
So repug judges, even Trump endorsed and appointed ones, require proper procedure? Trumps crack(pot) legal team couldn't file a single solitary lawsuit that followed proper procedure? Ted Cruz and the Texass hail Mary wasn't following proper procedure? All these repug lawyers don't know how to file a lawsuit - that's what you are saying?
Trump's legal team knew there was no chance of overthrowing the election because election laws set the bar very high when it comes to nullifying votes. It is not sufficient to show that there were violation of regulations, nor that there could have been election fraud. The law requires that the plaintiff show that there was illegal acts that actually changed the outcome of the election.

The purpose was never to change election results but rather to keep Trump's lies claiming the election was rigged alive. Trump may have lost the election but he's been able to convince millions of Americans that the election was rigged without a shred of proof.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." And this is exactly what Trump has done.


Perhaps Trump is part of the Establishment.

But playing the role of "Good cop" to the right ?

Prove it isn't so. I think the Right was in extreme desperation for a "Savior" and trump played that part.

The Establishment DS has been in firm control for decades now.
 
What we are saying is that your recourse is a nonviolent one. Elections.

Then why didn't the Original Colonists simply VOTE to be Independent of Great Britain ???

If they had voted, then surely England would have respected that vote according to you?
Because they didn’t have the constitution which gave them the opportunity to do so.

But now we do.

You don't need a Constitution to VOTE.
The Constitution did not give an opportunity for voting. You are confused.
You are negating your own argument. Voting has been taking place all over the world for millennia.

You stated that voting is the ultimate solution to disputes.
You were wrong.

Militias are now needed because among other things, people have decided that stealing elections to grab power is acceptable.
No, you are wrong.

The people have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances through either the political or judicial process.

If the people believe the government has overreached or acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief by filing suit in Federal court.

If the people believe an elected official has acted in a manner contrary to the Constitution, or violated the rights of the people, they may seek relief via the political process by voting him out of office – just as Trump was voted out of office.


they tried that and were rejected on BS grounds,,,
They filed 60 fucking lawsuits that were all laughed out of court. Just maybe the lawsuits were bullshit and the courts all recognized it. Maybe this whole thing is a charade by Trump to keep rubes like you giving him more free money.
your letting your ignorance show,,

they were thrown out on procedure not merit,,
So repug judges, even Trump endorsed and appointed ones, require proper procedure? Trumps crack(pot) legal team couldn't file a single solitary lawsuit that followed proper procedure? Ted Cruz and the Texass hail Mary wasn't following proper procedure? All these repug lawyers don't know how to file a lawsuit - that's what you are saying?
Trump's legal team knew there was no chance of overthrowing the election because election laws set the bar very high when it comes to nullifying votes. It is not sufficient to show that there were violation of regulations, nor that there could have been election fraud. The law requires that the plaintiff show that there was illegal acts that actually changed the outcome of the election.

The purpose was never to change election results but rather to keep Trump's lies claiming the election was rigged alive. Trump may have lost the election but he's been able to convince millions of Americans that the election was rigged without a shred of proof.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." And this is exactly what Trump has done.


Perhaps Trump is part of the Establishment.

But playing the role of "Good cop" to the right ?

Prove it isn't so. I think the Right was in extreme desperation for a "Savior" and trump played that part.

The Establishment DS has been in firm control for decades now.
I don't know about the establishment but I agree the Right, that is the Far Right was desperate for a "Savior" and along came Trump ready to play any role that would lead to adoration by his supporters and power over his enemies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top