The most respected conservative legal scholar in America:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not only are you lying, but my post both cited and quoted the specific article and clauses.
I did post what he could use. So did he. It’s called the Constitution.
That was one post which you cherry picked. Why did you choose to be deceptive, yet again? Because you’re a hack and because you’re fundamentally dishonest. That’s why.No you didn't. You said this:
Judge Luttig addressed this, and you ignored it.If he is Constitutionally the President of the Senate, why wouldn’t he be permitted to invoke the Speech and Debate Clause, anyway?
The speech and debate clause says:
United States Constitution, Article 1, clause 6.
The most respected conservative legal scholar in America:
Judge Luttig addressed this, and you ignored it.
He is not acting as President of the Senate in this purely ceremonial role.
Your most respected airplane lawyer needs to talk to Jonathan Turley, bub.:
The most respected conservative legal scholar in America
"My" respected lawyer?Your most respected airplane lawyer needs to talk to Jonathan Turley, bub.
It is simultaneously possible for him to be a valid nominee for a seat on the SCOTUS and yet wrong in his analysis about the Pence claim."My" respected lawyer?
All you morons don't know shit about shit. So sit the fuck down and keep your yap shut.
Ted Cruz once said he would've nominated the conservative judge testifying against Trump before the Jan. 6 committee to the Supreme Court
- Cruz, who voted to reject the 2020 election results in two states, has said Luttig is "like a father to me."
Retired conservative federal Judge Michael Luttig, a key witness in Thursday's January 6 committee hearing, was once named by Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas as an ideal Supreme Court nominee.
Cruz, one of six Republican senators who voted to reject state-certified election results on January 6, served as a law clerk for Luttig on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and has described him as a mentor. According to the New York Times, Cruz has even said Luttig is "like a father to me."
And during a debate against Trump in 2016, Cruz declared that he would've nominated Luttig to the Supreme Court instead of Chief Justice John Roberts.
"I would not have nominated John Roberts," Cruz said, according to Mediaite. "I would not have nominated him. I would have nominated my former boss Mike Luttig, who was Justice Scalia's law clerk."
Luttig, who served on the Fourth Circuit in Virginia for 15 years, was once on President George W. Bush's shortlist to be appointed to the Supreme Court. The 2005 nomination went instead to now-Justice Samuel Alito.
I was responding to his claim that somehow Luttig is "my" lawyer, like he's a Liberal, in this dope's (and your) never-ending quest to make EVERYTHING a Left vs. Right issue.It is simultaneously possible for him to be a valid nominee for a seat on the SCOTUS and yet wrong in his analysis about the Pence claim.
You libtards are severely restricted in your “thinking.”
Now an airplane lawyer........LOL"My" respected lawyer?
All you morons don't know shit about shit. So sit the fuck down and keep your yap shut.
Ted Cruz once said he would've nominated the conservative judge testifying against Trump before the Jan. 6 committee to the Supreme Court
- Cruz, who voted to reject the 2020 election results in two states, has said Luttig is "like a father to me."
Retired conservative federal Judge Michael Luttig, a key witness in Thursday's January 6 committee hearing, was once named by Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas as an ideal Supreme Court nominee.
Cruz, one of six Republican senators who voted to reject state-certified election results on January 6, served as a law clerk for Luttig on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and has described him as a mentor. According to the New York Times, Cruz has even said Luttig is "like a father to me."
And during a debate against Trump in 2016, Cruz declared that he would've nominated Luttig to the Supreme Court instead of Chief Justice John Roberts.
"I would not have nominated John Roberts," Cruz said, according to Mediaite. "I would not have nominated him. I would have nominated my former boss Mike Luttig, who was Justice Scalia's law clerk."
Luttig, who served on the Fourth Circuit in Virginia for 15 years, was once on President George W. Bush's shortlist to be appointed to the Supreme Court. The 2005 nomination went instead to now-Justice Samuel Alito.
Hey Shitty Lawyer BackAgain - here is the text of the Speech and Debate clause:
Article 1, Section 6
- The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
The Vice President, in his role as President of the Senate, is neither a Senator or a Representative.
You're a shitty lawyer.
I told you to sit down and shut the fuck up, you dumbass.Now an airplane lawyer........LOL
And the text makes clear that it applies to Senators and Representatives. Not the President of the Senate.He douchenugget: I quoted it previously. Try to keep up.
Your opinion of me remains of absolutely zero value.
I notice you still haven’t commented on the FACT that the Constitution placed a foot of the Vice President in the Senate, too.
Zzz. I know how to read. You communicate in our mother tongue like my ass toots German.I was responding to his claim that somehow Luttig is "my" lawyer, like he's a Liberal, in this dope's (and your) never-ending quest to make EVERYTHING a Left vs. Right issue.
A real lawyer knows how to read.
I told you to sit down and shut the fuck up, you dumbass.