Meet the Sisk family

[Bob Blaylock]

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

Tommy...we all know you want a blanket ban on guns so by your logic literally everyone should have their houses searched.

Tainted Tommy's main purpose is, and always has been, to remind us Americans why it is that we kicked the British filth out of our country more than two centuries ago.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

That's not the way it works here. There has to be probable cause to search a person's home and simply being barred from owning a firearm is not it. Probable cause comes into play if it is reported or otherwise suspected that the person has firearms in his possession. Otherwise, the authorities are theoretically able to search everyone's home to see if they have, say, bombs or bomb making materials because no one is allowed to possess a bomb.

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

That's not the way it works here. There has to be probable cause to search a person's home and simply being barred from owning a firearm is not it. Probable cause comes into play if it is reported or otherwise suspected that the person has firearms in his possession. Otherwise, the authorities are theoretically able to search everyone's home to see if they have, say, bombs or bomb making materials because no one is allowed to possess a bomb.

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

So any felon who has served his time (they arent allowed to posess a gun) should forever relinquish their 4th Amendment rights?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I just wanted everybody to know that I have contacted MI 5 and that they have dispatched a unit to Wales in order to confiscate Tammy's collection of antique pickle forks.

 

[Anathema]

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

Yes we have a law making possession of a firearm during a crime a 5 year MANDATORY Federal prison sentence. Another thst makes it a crime to fail a background check.

US District Attorneys routinely plead these charges away or simply fail to charge them. THISE would make a huge difference.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

Poor cucked Tommy cannot grasp the concept of the US Constitution that in this case guarantees the right of citizens to be secure in their persons, and property. As such warrantless random searches of people and property "just to check for compliance" are completely illegal.

He was banned from owning a gun. That should be enforced.

If only we had laws against murder.

What a tard

 

[Tommy Tainant]

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

Yes we have a law making possession of a firearm during a crime a 5 year MANDATORY Federal prison sentence. Another thst makes it a crime to fail a background check.

US District Attorneys routinely plead these charges away or simply fail to charge them. THISE would make a huge difference.

Your police are weak and ineffective. That is why the Sisks are dead.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

Yes we have a law making possession of a firearm during a crime a 5 year MANDATORY Federal prison sentence. Another thst makes it a crime to fail a background check.

US District Attorneys routinely plead these charges away or simply fail to charge them. THISE would make a huge difference.

Your police are weak and ineffective. That is why the Sisks are dead.

No, our police are unfortunately pawns of far left POLITICIANS

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

Five facts from heavy.com, great, and I can watch porn at the same time.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

Yes we have a law making possession of a firearm during a crime a 5 year MANDATORY Federal prison sentence. Another thst makes it a crime to fail a background check.

US District Attorneys routinely plead these charges away or simply fail to charge them. THISE would make a huge difference.

Your police are weak and ineffective. That is why the Sisks are dead.

If lefty loons like yourself have any say in the matter the law abiding citizens should be forcefully unarmed making them just as weak and ineffectual against criminal elements who will not follow laws.

 

[MikeK]

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

Tommy, how would you suggest the authorities go about checking to see if "these people" actually have guns? 3AM S.W.A.T. raid and thorough premises search? Do you want to live in a country where that sort of thing is acceptable?

A gun ban will make as much sense as alcohol Prohibition made, but fortunately we had enough sense to put an end to that counterproductive fiasco. Then came the War on Drugs, which continues as an even more counterproductive fiasco than alcohol Prohibition. But now the citizen/moron faction, along with corrupt and/or incompetent politicians, want to impose another ban, a gun ban which will serve to disarm the law-abiding, create another counterproductive fiasco, leaving the criminal element armed and more dangerous than ever. Bottom line: the very idea of a gun ban in America is beyond stupid.

 

[progressive hunter]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

of course this is a sad story and probably could have been prevented but who can say for sure,,,
but lets not ignore the estimated 500K-3 million times a yr guns stop crime and save lives,,

 

[Anathema]

Your police are weak and ineffective. That is why the Sisks are dead.

The two issues I mentioned are problems with our Prosecutors and our Legal System, notvthe police.

 

[2aguy]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

That's not the way it works here. There has to be probable cause to search a person's home and simply being barred from owning a firearm is not it. Probable cause comes into play if it is reported or otherwise suspected that the person has firearms in his possession. Otherwise, the authorities are theoretically able to search everyone's home to see if they have, say, bombs or bomb making materials because no one is allowed to possess a bomb.

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

Our gun problem, Tommy, isn't normal people who own guns for self defense, hunting, and sport.....our problem is the democrat party. They have judges, politicians, and prosecutors who keep letting repeat gun offenders out of jail on bond, and out of prison with short sentences. This isn't made up, it is actually happening...and we have to ask why they do this? They are the ones who complain loudest about gun crime....yet they keep letting violent, known...I repeat, Known, gun offenders out of jail and prison...

These repeat offenders are 99% of our gun crime problem.....

Can you maybe explain to us why the democrats keep doing this?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

That's not the way it works here. There has to be probable cause to search a person's home and simply being barred from owning a firearm is not it. Probable cause comes into play if it is reported or otherwise suspected that the person has firearms in his possession. Otherwise, the authorities are theoretically able to search everyone's home to see if they have, say, bombs or bomb making materials because no one is allowed to possess a bomb.

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

No, no one is decling to enforce the law. If the man had tried to purchase a weapon, the system would notify the merchant that this person is barred from owning firearms and thus would decline the sale.

However, there are ways to procure firearms other than by legal means. There’s no way to prevent someone from purchasing a firearm illegally if they are determined to do so and the law stipulates that they cannot routinely search his home, vehicle or person without probable cause. In other words, they cannot get a warrant to search unless they have evidence to suggest he actually has firearms in his possession. They cannot search his home simply because he’s not allowed to own them.

Simply not being allowed to own firearms is no indication that a person has firearms or will ever attempt to procure one and so is not a reasonable justification for a search. This is where probable cause comes into play.

 

[Rustic]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

Lol
None of your fucking business you fat tub of shit

 

[Rustic]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

That's not the way it works here. There has to be probable cause to search a person's home and simply being barred from owning a firearm is not it. Probable cause comes into play if it is reported or otherwise suspected that the person has firearms in his possession. Otherwise, the authorities are theoretically able to search everyone's home to see if they have, say, bombs or bomb making materials because no one is allowed to possess a bomb.

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

Our gun problem, Tommy, isn't normal people who own guns for self defense, hunting, and sport.....our problem is the democrat party. They have judges, politicians, and prosecutors who keep letting repeat gun offenders out of jail on bond, and out of prison with short sentences. This isn't made up, it is actually happening...and we have to ask why they do this? They are the ones who complain loudest about gun crime....yet they keep letting violent, known...I repeat, Known, gun offenders out of jail and prison...

These repeat offenders are 99% of our gun crime problem.....

Can you maybe explain to us why the democrats keep doing this?

Yep,
With over 400 million firearms illegally owned in this country, A fraction of a fraction of those are used in violent crime.
Execute repeat offenders… Problem solved

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

Searched by whom?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

John & Mary Sisk Family: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

John and Mary Sisk, the parents shot to death with their three young children in Elkmont, Alabama, were a car dealer tech known as “Dub Diesel” and a middle school special education teacher. Authorities say the family was slain by a 14-year-old boy who was John’s son and Mary’s stepson.

The suspect accused of killing all five family members – including an infant – has not yet been identified by authorities because of his young age.

So a 14 year old boy kills his parents and sibs and it doesnt raise a ripple because gun slaughter is an every day thing in the crazy US.

Pop was banned from owning a gun but this doesnt seem to be a problem because nobody checks if that is being enforced.

Should the authorities go around and check if these people actually have guns ?

How would that be done?

People who are not allowed to own guns should have their homes searched .There has to be accountability or the law is pointless.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The problem with this is that it falls into the ‘price of freedom’ trap – that the Constitution renders us ‘helpless’ to address gun crime and violence, and that innocent children must needlessly die to safeguard our protected rights and liberties.

It’s like Michael Dukakis’ response to ‘what if your wife were raped and murdered.’

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

But you have a law in place and decline to enforce it. Keeping guns from criminals seems a sensible move.

Yes we have a law making possession of a firearm during a crime a 5 year MANDATORY Federal prison sentence. Another thst makes it a crime to fail a background check.

US District Attorneys routinely plead these charges away or simply fail to charge them. THISE would make a huge difference.

Your police are weak and ineffective. That is why the Sisks are dead.

You know that’s not true.

You’re also familiar enough with the American Constitutional system to know that random, unwarranted searches by the state are illegal, that the police are agents of the state and subject to Constitutional restrictions, and that absent evidence that a prohibited person is in possession of a firearm, any search or seizure would likewise be illegal.

You’re as bad as most conservatives on this site – the same disingenuous ‘arguments,’ the same propensity for sophistry.