Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #41
Really? Then why did Windsor affirm 56 times that marriage definition was a state's power? To "set the stage" that the fed could then rip it away with psuedo-legal gibberish in Obergefell 2 years later? Oh, wait, let me guess. You'll quote one vague insinuating line in subtext that will "prove your point" against the 56 times the Court strongly emphasized marriage definition is a state power...Scalia wasn't subtle at all with how obviously Windsor telegraphed what was coming next.
Lifestyle-Marriage Equality Slugout: State Authority vs Federal?