Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #61
Because innate vs behavioral will be the pivot of the next Ruling on this matter. That's why you should care.I'm not reading 53 pages, but this sort of thinking is dumb. Who gives a shit if someone was born gay or not? If I own a business the right is MINE. No one with any brain at all could actually believe a person has a right to make me work for them.
Nobody can be forced to promote behaviors, ideals or rituals they find morally offensive. So sayeth the 1st Amendment. States cannot prefer one set of behaviors, ideals or rituals over other. A State cannot de facto establish an official behavior/ideals/ritual (religion).
Obergefell illegally found that just some deviant sex behaviors (but definitely not others) are included under the 14th's protections. Which instantly in itself is a violation of the 14th Amendment. How many states do you know of where polygamy and incest are legal marriages?
It's a rat's nest but rest assured, the new Constitutional scholars on the Court are going to take more than just a passing glance and untold liberties with interpreting the 14th Amendment.