Gorsuch v. Sotomayor on Free Speech: The Colorado Ruling

[Blaster]

No they have not stood up for the rights of the oppressed,.

You do not fix or fight or stand up for thr rights of some by tramping on the rights of others

Legally forbidding the basic right of personal preferrence ( AKA discrimination ) does NOTHING to help the oppressed it only oppresses others.

Bullshit.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The Supreme Court ruled on something that didn't happen. This ruling is going to be ovverturned.

Which court overturns the Supreme Court?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Bullshit.

yes you are

 

[JoeB131]

The SC ruled that grilling a sandwich is not a message, but making a cake for a gay wedding is.

Cope.

And.

Seethe.

Um, okay. I guess we'll just have to put the Homophobic bakers out of business through boycotts and cancel culture.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Sotomeyer is a straight up extortionist.

Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor's staff prodded colleges and libraries to buy her books

For colleges and libraries seeking a big name for a guest lecturer, few come bigger than Sonia Sotomayor, the Supreme Court justice who rose from poverty in the Bronx to the nation’s highest court.

apnews.com

Tax funded court employees pressuring tax funded colleges to buy her for-profit books, making her millions. Progs won't care. Their too busy stressing out about ClarenceThomas being "uppity" by taking vacations with white people which cost taxpayers nothing.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Um, okay. I guess we'll just have to put the Homophobic bakers out of business through boycotts and cancel culture.

That should have been your first go to. It certainly worked on Bud Lite.

 

[TNHarley]

This is a signal that all discrimination laws may now be brought back for revision.

Lets pray that happens

 

[JoeB131]

That should have been your first go to. It certainly worked on Bud Lite.

Is Bud Lite out of business? Um. No.
Bud Lite also didn't break the law, unlike the Homophobic Baker.
Some of whom have been driven out of business.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Um, okay. I guess we'll just have to put the Homophobic bakers out of business through boycotts and cancel culture.

Because you Homosexuals were so efficient with Chik Fil A?

 

[JustAGuy1]

The Supreme Court ruled on something that didn't happen. This ruling is going to be ovverturned.

You don't seem to be quite as Educated as you pretend to be.

 

[JustAGuy1]

The SCOTUS clearly is not just wrong, but has become evil.
They want a return to lunch counters refusing service to Blacks.

Did you teach your kids to lie like this?

 

[AZrailwhale]

Is Bud Lite out of business? Um. No.
Bud Lite also didn't break the law, unlike the Homophobic Baker.
Some of whom have been driven out of business.

Bud Light did something worse than breaking the law; it offended its customer base. There is nothing worse a publicly owned company can do.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Is Bud Lite out of business? Um. No.
Bud Lite also didn't break the law, unlike the Homophobic Baker.
Some of whom have been driven out of business.

The tide has turned, my man . . .

Trump's contribution to the USSC will long out live him. Not to mention that Future Rep presidents will be under pressure to nominate such stalwarts as well.

I'll take a blowhard who tweets a stupid comment about terminating parts of the Constitution but makes a Yuge difference with his nominations in having it actually followed over a senile pedo who nominates justices who pretend they don't know the definition of the word "woman," but are counted on to say the US Constitution says whatever the lastest woke activists say it says.

 

[JoeB131]

Bud Light did something worse than breaking the law; it offended its customer base. There is nothing worse a publicly owned company can do.

Um, how was their customer base "Offended" exactly?
Some nitwit in marketing sent a set of novelty cans to a trans influencer, and you all lost your ever loving shit over it.

I had no idea who Dylan Mulvany was until the right wing decided to make her a national issue.

 

[JoeB131]

The tide has turned, my man . . .

Trump's contribution to the USSC will long out live him. Not to mention that Future Rep presidents will be under pressure to nominate such stalwarts as well.

Has it occurred to you that it might have the opposite effect?

The only people who are thrilled with what the knuckle draggers on SCOTUS are doing right now are Angry White Males. People of color, women, and LGBTQ are kind of rightfully horrified, and they should be.

You guys crashed and burned in 2022 because of ONE bad ruling (Dobbs). Imagine when that gets compounded by multiple bad rulings.

You see, past Republican Presidents didn't put crazies on the court because they didn't want to have this happen.

What happens when the majority realizes it really is too dangerous to put Republicans in the White House?

Ten years, the Bush appointees will retire or die. Then the Trump Appointees will just be a crazy minority.

I'll take a blowhard who tweets a stupid comment about terminating parts of the Constitution but makes a Yuge difference with his nominations in having it actually followed over a senile pedo who nominates justices who pretend they don't know the definition of the word "woman," but are counted on to say the US Constitution says whatever the lastest woke activists say it says.

Um, okay, that was about the craziest sentence in the English Language.

By the logic you put down here, we should have no rulings on any technology invented after 1787, then.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Um, how was their customer base "Offended" exactly?
Some nitwit in marketing sent a set of novelty cans to a trans influencer, and you all lost your ever loving shit over it.

I had no idea who Dylan Mulvany was until the right wing decided to make her a national issue.

Since Bud Light lost hundreds of millions of dollars or more because customers stopped buying it, it's obvious they offended their customer base which in now drinking different beer.

 

[JoeB131]

Since Bud Light lost hundreds of millions of dollars or more because customers stopped buying it, it's obvious they offended their customer base which in now drinking different beer.

Actually, Beer has been declining as a drink of choice for a while now.

Beer Is Officially in Decline. It’s Both Better and Worse Than It Seems.

We're all living in White Claw’s world now. But your favorite brewery may not be for long.

slate.com

The overall business picture of beer is that it’s in decline. But the decline is not a free fall. Beer is still, by far, the most widely consumed alcoholic beverage by volume. In fact, overall alcohol consumption had actually increased in the past couple of decades leading into 2021. So, when alcohol industry analysts say beer is falling, they’re talking about beer losing market share of retail dollars. In 2022 spirit sales amounted to 42.9 percent, and beer accounted for 41.2 percent—its first year in second place.

Beer has actually been losing market share for some time. From 2011 to 2021, for example, Anheuser-Busch InBev—the conglomerate behind Budweiser, Bud Light, Michelob, Stella Artois, and more—fell from 46.9 percent of the market to 38.6 percent. But now Americans’ changing taste in alcohol has reached an inflection point, and it isn’t the Budweiser bottle that’s sweating. If your brewery is very large—or, perhaps surprisingly, if it’s very small—you’ll likely find comfortable shelter from the storm coming for the beer market.

If you look at the crime, poverty, violence, in this society, and the worst thing you are upset about is that a dude in a dress got some novelty beer cans, you have the wrong priorities.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Has it occurred to you that it might have the opposite effect?

The only people who are thrilled with what the knuckle draggers on SCOTUS are doing right now are Angry White Males. People of color, women, and LGBTQ are kind of rightfully horrified, and they should be.

You guys crashed and burned in 2022 because of ONE bad ruling (Dobbs). Imagine when that gets compounded by multiple bad rulings.

You see, past Republican Presidents didn't put crazies on the court because they didn't want to have this happen.

What happens when the majority realizes it really is too dangerous to put Republicans in the White House?

Ten years, the Bush appointees will retire or die. Then the Trump Appointees will just be a crazy minority.

If the voters decided that they don't want Republicans becuase they appoint justices who believe in the U.S. Constitution, then the voters will have spoken. Assuming that it was the voters . . .

Um, okay, that was about the craziest sentence in the English Language.

By the logic you put down here, we should have no rulings on any technology invented after 1787, then.

Only Democrats argue that. They say, "Where does the constitution say ANYTHING about assault weapons?"

Free speech is free speech, whether you are standing on an apple box in the public square, or posting on the newly liberated Twitter.
Right to bear arms is right to bear arms, whether you bear a flintlock blunderbus, or an AR15 with laser sites.

Right not to quarter soldiers is right not to quarter soldiers, whether your live in a log cabin with a sod roof, or a solar and wind powered Smart House.

Right to be secure in your person, papers or effects is right to be secure in your person, papers or effects, whether you have love letters written in quil pen or encrypted email.

etc.

 

[JoeB131]

If the voters decided that they don't want Republicans becuase they appoint justices who believe in the U.S. Constitution, then the voters will have spoken. Assuming that it was the voters . . .

Actually, the voters were pretty clear in that they didn't want Trump appointing that kind of justice, which is why he lost by 2 million votes. Despite that, we got 3 justices appointed by him because Republicans couldn't even follow their own rules. Hold up Merrick Garland for a year after Scalia took a dirt nap, but jam through Serena Joy Barrett.

Only Democrats argue that. They say, "Where does the constitution say ANYTHING about assault weapons?"

Free speech is free speech, whether you are standing on an apple box in the public square, or posting on the newly liberated Twitter.
Right to bear arms is right to bear arms, whether you bear a flintlock blunderbus, or an AR15 with laser sites.

Actually, it's a valid question. In the Founder's time, everyone didn't own a gun, only the affluent did. The idea that a crazy person could walk into a gun store and walk out with a semi-automatic weapon with a 100 round clip would have been beyond their comprehension.

Right not to quarter soldiers is right not to quarter soldiers, whether your live in a log cabin with a sod roof, or a solar and wind powered Smart House.

Again, we have militarized police, so, no the Third Amendment has become a dead issue.

Right to be secure in your person, papers or effects is right to be secure in your person, papers or effects, whether you have love letters written in quil pen or encrypted email.

Except not really. Clearly when an email can be hacked and needs to be on a public server, you have no real expectation of privacy.

 

[Hollie]

Um, okay. I guess we'll just have to put the Homophobic bakers out of business through boycotts and cancel culture.

Um, okay. Aren’t “we”, delicate flowers. Grab a bunch of your antifa pals and do your best boycott and cancel culture whining and moaning. Do your best impression of a petulant child who kicks and screams because the grownups make grownup decisions about how they live their lives.

The world revolves around the hurt feelings.

Let us know when “we” can be an audience to your leading a mob of similarly addled, toothless, social misfits waving your cardboard signs.