Martial Law

Now you just sound like one of the many common-wealth/British subversive apologists for monarchy that we have polluting this site.

9chub2.jpg
what is this if not a personal attack??

I am promoting freedom from government not this,,
 
you keep saying I m wrong but refuse to show how,,

I have given detailed explanations that you keep ignoring,,

are you saying hitler and stalin were not authoritarians??

wht do you think the american experiment is??
Hitler and Stalin were on extreme opposite ends of the political spectrum.

That is the point when I saw two dangers approaching. Previously, I did not truly understand their names or their importance to the German people’s existence. Their names were Marxism and Jewry. - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf


.
 
Congress won’t impeach and convict.
Because it was a lousy case. There was no reason to convict. If there really had been? It would not have broken down into quarrelsome partisan bickering.


SCOTUS gave him presidential immunity.
From being prosecuted for official acts.

Not from criminal acts, and no protection from being impeached.
 
in europe not here,,

in ours the right side is freedom based the left side is authoritrian,,
You all worship Dear Leader Trump like every authoritarian worshipping cult of submissive cucks in history.
 
Trade with enemies prevents war. Economically entangled countries don’t fight each other. You know how we haven’t had a world war in like 100 years? It’s nice.

Not that your point is relevant anyway, since Trump is perfectly happy to slap tariffs on allies too.

There’s as few short term benefits to protectionism as long term benefits.

You’re just afraid of competition, which is the best economic driving force the world has ever seen. It’s fundamental to capitalism.
The Soviet Union was not a major trading partner during the Cold War

So it wasnt trade preventing a hot war

It was our superior economy and military

As for tariffs we dont know what trump will actually do

Its open for negotiation
 
Because it was a lousy case. There was no reason to convict. If there really had been? It would not have broken down into quarrelsome partisan bickering.



From being prosecuted for official acts.

Not from criminal acts, and no protection from being impeached.
Republicans won’t impeach him. Why would they?
 
You’re dodging the issue of authoritarianism by focusing on your strange obsession with girls amateur sports.

As if that’s the most pressing issue before the country.
Women’s rights is what your party runs on. “Roevember”. Now you’re dodging.

Too funny

Trump 47

😎
 
what is this if not a personal attack??

I am promoting freedom from government not this,,
You are absolutely correct.

It is despicable to accuse someone of being British or a Common-wealth shill.

Even if they are stoopid enough to pop off about different levels of, "authoritarianism."

My apologies.
 
15th post
You are absolutely correct.

It is despicable to accuse someone of being British or a Common-wealth shill.

Even if they are stoopid enough to pop off about different levels of, "authoritarianism."

My apologies.
whts stupid about it???

are you saying a person that allows personal property ownership but still wants to control what you do with it is not authoritarian but someone that doesnt allow it but still wants to control you is??
 
The Soviet Union was not a major trading partner during the Cold War

So it wasnt trade preventing a hot war

It was our superior economy and military

As for tariffs we dont know what trump will actually do

Its open for negotiation
Funny how our economy was superior when we pursued free trade and the Soviets pursued the protection and autarky you desire.
 
Back
Top Bottom