Martial Law

[Unkotare]

theyre called the federalist papers,,

ever heard of them??

a straight line with two ends is not circular,,

I am going to go out on a limb and say you have a college education where you were told what to think not how to think,,,,

Federalist number 10 really sums up the whole story pretty well.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Nancy had nice legs.

And look who she is today..................................

[URL='https://x.com/NancySinatra']
[/URL]
https://x.com/NancySinatra

https://x.com/NancySinatra

Post​

See new posts

Conversation​

Nancy Sinatra

@NancySinatra

Such a fine, impressive team.
Quote













Chuck Schumer

@SenSchumer

The Senate Democratic Leadership for the 119th Congress:

 

[Unkotare]

Since you have only been studying South Korea since you heard the news about martial law this morning your opinions carry no weight

Or very little

I wish we had more information to go on

I know a great deal about South Korea, and I have for decades. There is a leftist streak of sympathy for (and collusion with) North Korea that has been a blight on the south for a very long time. It used to be dealt with much less gently. It is an infection that sickens aspects of Japanese media and politics as well.

 

[Mac-7]

I know a great deal about South Korea, and I have for decades. There is a leftist streak of sympathy for (and collusion with) North Korea that has been a blight on the south for a very long time. It used to be dealt with much less gently. It is an infection that sickens aspects of Japanese media and politics as well.

Well, libs will be libs

Some think the only way to have peace is unification, and they are willing to do so on North Korean terms

 

[Unkotare]

...

Some think the only way to have peace is unification...

Not too many.

 

[Mac-7]

Not too many.

I hope you are right

But libs can be pretty irrational

They are perfectly capable of biting the hand that feeds them

The South Korean system is far superior to the North

But not every South Korean understands that

 

[sparky]

81 percent of Ukrainians don't want an election until the war is over.

how do you know this G5?

~S~

 

[MisterBeale]

theyre called the federalist papers,,

ever heard of them??

Not only have a heard of them, I have read many of them. as well as the letters between the founders.


Have you?

Founders Online: Home

Founders Online: Correspondence and Other Writings of Seven Major Shapers of the United States (George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison)

founders.archives.gov

You won't find your insane statements supported anywhere in them. How do I know? Because all of the political parties/movements on your chart, did NOT EVEN EXIST at the founding.


But if you want to prove me wrong? Sure, give me a link to your insanity.


Because no where in them does it make reference to your silly chart.

IN fact,

Nationally, the Democrat party did not exist till 1828 with Andrew Jackson's formation, and the GOP did not exist till 1854 with Abe Lincoln.

The Libertarian party did not start till 1971.


Owenism. . . the precursor to Marxism and Socialism, & ANARCHISM, did not come about until 1820.

And hell, fascism? The idea was completely unknown by the founders as well. That did not come about until Mussolini in 1917.


YOU ARE OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE and just continue to show your ignorance.

 

[progressive hunter]

Not only have a heard of them, I have read many of them.

And the letters between the founders.


Have you?

Founders Online: Home

Founders Online: Correspondence and Other Writings of Seven Major Shapers of the United States (George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison)

founders.archives.gov

You won't find your insane statements supported anywhere in them. How do I know? Because all of the political parties/movement on your chart, did NOT EVEN EXIST at the founding.


But if you want to prove me wrong? Sure, give me a link your insanity.


Because no where in them does it make reference to your silly chart.

IN fact,

Nationally, the Democrat party did not exist till 1828 with Andrew Jackson's formation, and the GOP did not exist till 1854 with Abe Lincoln.

The Libertarian party did not start till 1971.


Owenism. . . the precursor to Marxism and Socialism, & ANARCHISM, did not come about until 1920.

And hell, fascism? The idea was completely unknown by the founders as well. That did not come about until Mussolini in 1917.


YOU ARE OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE and just continue to show your ignorance.

thats why the scale is from total freedom on the right and full authoritarian on the left,,

 

[MisterBeale]

why did the founders first start with the articles of confederation and why did they fail??

The Articles of Confederation DID NOT fail.

This is a bullshit narrative that you learned in elementary school and junior high.

Gee. . . I wonder why GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS, and a international corporate run society, taught you a narrative that pushed forward the idea that only government can solve problems?




Tell me, what were the issues of Shay's Rebellion? And who are the primary beneficiaries of government regulation of interstate commerce?

How does that differ, if it does, from how the multi-nationals and billionaires control the global economy now?

If you actually bleev that the Articles of Confederation were not adequate for THE PEOPLE, then obviously you hate that Constitution and desire a one world order ruled by the UN and DAVOS, as the issue are EXACTLY THE SAME!




I know need not throw ad hom your way, you prove your ignorance with each and every post!

 

[MisterBeale]

thats why the scale is from total freedom on the right and full authoritarian on the left,,

So no link to anyone that knows anything. . . just more circular reasoning then?

 

[progressive hunter]

The Articles of Confederation DID NOT fail.

This is a bullshit narrative that you learned in elementary school and junior high.

Gee. . . I wonder why GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS, and a international corporate run society, taught you a narrative that pushed forward the idea that only government can solve problems?




Tell me, what were the issues of Shay's Rebellion? And who are the primary beneficiaries of government regulation of interstate commerce?

How does that differ, if it does, from how the multi-nationals and billionaires control the global economy now?

If you actually bleev that the Articles of Confederation were not adequate for THE PEOPLE, then obviously you hate that Constitution and desire a one world order ruled by the UN and DAVOS, as the issue are EXACTLY THE SAME!




I know need not throw ad hom your way, you prove your ignorance with each and every post!

are you saying we still live under the articles and the constitution doesnt exist??

 

[progressive hunter]

So no link to anyone that knows anything. . . just more circular reasoning then?

how is straight line with 2 ends circular??

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Not as uninformed as you think.

Declaring martial law because of a fabricated threat is straight out of the fascist playbook.

Sounds just like J6 . Holding Americas in jail without charges.

 

[MisterBeale]

They failed because they were too decentralized. A case of too much of a good thing.

In the mind of ruling elites, sure.


IN that case, the Constitution is a failure for the EXACT SAME REASONS.

The Constitution was put into place by the federalists for more government control, more regulation of the economy for economic elites to make a profit. And to crush dissent from those not in charge.


"Why should I trade one tyrant 3,000 miles away for 3,000 tyrants one mile away?"


These are the same issues that the UN and DAVOS seek to address. They all want to strip the freedom and liberty of the people so ruling elites can make more money and live better off their labor.

 

[MisterBeale]

how is straight line with 2 ends circular??

I've already told you, it isn't about the line.

Every time you make your argument about the validity of the chart, you refer back to the chart as proof you are correct.

That's an circle argument and a fallacy.

It is like when Christians and Atheists argue about the existence of god, and Christians refer back to the source of their belief (The Bible,) as proof of gods existence.
Another circular argument.



I'm just about done with you. You aren't even worth my time you are so dumb.

 

[MisterBeale]

are you saying we still live under the articles and the constitution doesnt exist??

Nope, we lost the right to live under the Articles of Confederation, b/c the elites manufactured crisis to justified more control.

Just as they are trying to destroy the Constitution now, and make a global technocractic regime, with global elites calling the shots.

If you don't understand what went on during the global scamdemic, you really just are too dumb to get this.

 

[progressive hunter]

I've already told you, it isn't about the line.

Every time you make your argument about the validity of the chart, you refer back to the chart as proof you are correct.

That's an circle argument and a fallacy.

It is like when Christians and Atheists argue about the existence of god, and Christians refer back to the source of their belief (The Bible,) as proof of gods existence.
Another circular argument.



I'm just about done with you. You aren't even worth my time you are so dumb.

is that all you got??

say its irrelevant and then more personal attacks,,

sounds like you know youve gotten yourself in above your head and do like most leftist do..

 

[Ringo]

It sounds like leftists are acting up and occupying government buildings in S, Korea.

After the western media reports on the events in Georgia, I thought this was a good thing.....

 

[Unkotare]

The Articles of Confederation DID NOT fail.
...

Of course they did.