Market will tank if Biden wins.

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're fucking deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick fuck for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

Idk you tell me. I d say at least 90% posed a direct danger to the police officers or other civilians.

You're the one who's trying to reframe your position. You said 1000 is not enough. Now that you realize how retarded you sound for saying that, you're trying to move the goalposts, saying you're talking about cases where police encounter murder or rape as it's occurring. So how many of the 1000 you were talking about fit that criteria....

 

[Flopper]

NBC is anti Trump and even they agree. Biden has been in Gov't for the past 40+ years, has zero business acumen and will not be seen as a business friendly president. Usually the economy decides the next President but this is an odd time with the virus. Should be interesting but those with 401Ks, you're voting against your self interests if you vote for Biden.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/24/bidens-big-lead-in-the-polls-could-be-partly-behind-markets-drop-and-may-lead-to-more-weakness.html

Has there every been supporters of the incumbent that did not claim the economy or market would crash if the incumbent lost?

You tell me...has there? How old are you?

To my knowledge. Supporters of every incumbent claim economic disaster if their opponent wins.

The fact is it doesn’t matter much which party wins the White House as far stock market performance. Republicans have the reputation of being good for market but the fact is it doesn’t matter much which party wins the White House in regard to stock market performance. Since 1900, democrat presidents have done slightly better in terms of market performance than republicans.

Market expectations of presidential candidates are often wrong. Take a look at the last 3 presidents. Who would have every guessed that George W. Bush, a republican governor, an oil man promising tax cuts and cutting the size of government would have a 26% fall in market during his term in office. An would anybody every believe that Obama, the great socialist who would destroy free enterprise would preside over a 62% market gain at this point in his presidency where George Trump, the great business man would rack up only a 33% market gain.

The stock market, historians, and voters judge presidents not by how well the country is run in the good times but how well it is runs in bad times. Shit happens to most all presidents. Bush had the Iraqi War. Obama had the great the last recession. And Trump has Covid.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're fucking deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick fuck for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

Idk you tell me. I d say at least 90% posed a direct danger to the police officers or other civilians.

You're the one who's trying to reframe your position. You said 1000 is not enough. Now that you realize how retarded you sound for saying that, you're trying to move the goalposts, saying you're talking about cases where police encounter murder or rape as it's occurring. So how many of the 1000 you were talking about fit that criteria....

We have too many murderers and rapists on the streets. The fewer the better. I stand by my comment. If you ever need a police officer, I hope they don’t come since you hate them. Hater.

 

[Flopper]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're fucking deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick fuck for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

The basic reason for a cop to kill is to protect innocent lives including himself when there is no doubt of the intent of the perp. BLM or any other organization should not go after this cop. Then there is a whole range of dicey situation ranging from the cop who shoots a know dangerous perp who has killed before and escaping to the cop that chokes someone to death as he plead for air. It is these dicey situation that cause the outage because it's all about intent, what the cop is thinking, etc which is often hard to determine.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're fucking deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick fuck for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

Idk you tell me. I d say at least 90% posed a direct danger to the police officers or other civilians.

You're the one who's trying to reframe your position. You said 1000 is not enough. Now that you realize how retarded you sound for saying that, you're trying to move the goalposts, saying you're talking about cases where police encounter murder or rape as it's occurring. So how many of the 1000 you were talking about fit that criteria....

We have too many murderers and rapists on the streets. The fewer the better. I stand by my comment. If you ever need a police officer, I hope they don’t come since you hate them. Hater.

That doesn't address the question I asked but I'll chalk up you running from the question I asked as you being a pussy who's too scared to answer.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're fucking deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick fuck for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

Idk you tell me. I d say at least 90% posed a direct danger to the police officers or other civilians.

You're the one who's trying to reframe your position. You said 1000 is not enough. Now that you realize how retarded you sound for saying that, you're trying to move the goalposts, saying you're talking about cases where police encounter murder or rape as it's occurring. So how many of the 1000 you were talking about fit that criteria....

We have too many murderers and rapists on the streets. The fewer the better. I stand by my comment. If you ever need a police officer, I hope they don’t come since you hate them. Hater.

That doesn't address the question I asked but I'll chalk up you running from the question I asked as you being a pussy who's too scared to answer.

Whatever helps you sleep at night. Repeat your question.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're fucking deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick fuck for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

Idk you tell me. I d say at least 90% posed a direct danger to the police officers or other civilians.

You're the one who's trying to reframe your position. You said 1000 is not enough. Now that you realize how retarded you sound for saying that, you're trying to move the goalposts, saying you're talking about cases where police encounter murder or rape as it's occurring. So how many of the 1000 you were talking about fit that criteria....

We have too many murderers and rapists on the streets. The fewer the better. I stand by my comment. If you ever need a police officer, I hope they don’t come since you hate them. Hater.

That doesn't address the question I asked but I'll chalk up you running from the question I asked as you being a pussy who's too scared to answer.

Whatever helps you sleep at night. Repeat your question.

Don't need to. Your avoidance of it already answered for you.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're fucking deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick fuck for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

Idk you tell me. I d say at least 90% posed a direct danger to the police officers or other civilians.

You're the one who's trying to reframe your position. You said 1000 is not enough. Now that you realize how retarded you sound for saying that, you're trying to move the goalposts, saying you're talking about cases where police encounter murder or rape as it's occurring. So how many of the 1000 you were talking about fit that criteria....

We have too many murderers and rapists on the streets. The fewer the better. I stand by my comment. If you ever need a police officer, I hope they don’t come since you hate them. Hater.

That doesn't address the question I asked but I'll chalk up you running from the question I asked as you being a pussy who's too scared to answer.

Whatever helps you sleep at night. Repeat your question.

Don't need to. Your avoidance of it already answered for you.

OK. Feel free to cease responding then. Trumps presidency has driven you mad. It amuses me.

 

[ninja007]

biden cant string one sentence together or stay up 60 minutes.