Market will tank if Biden wins.

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

NBC is anti Trump and even they agree. Biden has been in Gov't for the past 40+ years, has zero business acumen and will not be seen as a business friendly president. Usually the economy decides the next President but this is an odd time with the virus. Should be interesting but those with 401Ks, you're voting against your self interests if you vote for Biden.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/24/bidens-big-lead-in-the-polls-could-be-partly-behind-markets-drop-and-may-lead-to-more-weakness.html

Has there every been supporters of the incumbent that did not claim the economy or market would crash if the incumbent lost?

You tell me...has there? How old are you?

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

 

[Faun]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

“Nobody”...once again you deal in absolutes. You’re the laughing stock of this board. Stop replying to me if that’s how you feel. I actually enjoy getting under your skin. Frankly, you’re a wimp.

Okay, I realize that I am probably feeding your insecurities by paying attention to you... because you are a sad little man.

No you use my own verbiage against me? Weak.

Man enough to father children...which is fantastic. I love my kids.

You say you love them but you want to give police the authority to kill them if they so choose.

I want to give police the authority to protect the good citizens of this country. I trust 99.9% of them will do a great job.

Fortunately, your deviate desires are ignored by our justice system.

Desires for lawful police protection? OK

No, your expressed desire for Cops to act as executioners.

I said they should kill more violent criminals. I stand by that. You want to defend murderers and rapists, thats on you.

Actually, what you said is 1000 is not enough.

Its not. They should kill every murderer and rapist. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Not sure how much more clearly I can state that?

I already get you're a sick, deprived individual.

You want to defend killers and rapists. I want them dead. Agree to disagree I guess?

I defended no killers or rapists. You minimal attachment to the English language is your problem, not mine.

You defend killers and rapists. You're outraged by a missed call and tragic death but don't care about the 100s who die in Chicago monthly. OK....whatever fits your leftist narrative.

LOL

You're ******* deranged.

I defended no one.

You're deranged. I never said cops should kill innocent people or shoot first. See how that works? FaunStrawman.

You said they should kill. That's fucked up. Do you even realized how fucked in the head you are?

Should kill murderers and rapists. You don't want to kill them? You just cannot deviate from personal attacks. So weak.

If they are convicted in a court of law, I have no problem with them being executed.

Unlike a deranged lunatic like you, who wants to see cops acting as judge and executioner.

You're a sick **** for whom there is no help.

I am the same as you. If a cop pulls up on a criminal shooting at civilians, does he have the right to shoot him? Yes or No?

That rarely happens. Typically, cops show up after the crime has been committed and usually have to find the suspect(s).

Rarely? Link.....

And if it does happen do they have the right to shoot? Yes or no?

So if a cop pulls up on a suspect and the suspect starts shooting, may the cops shoot back?

If they pull up on someone shooting at civilians, yes, they should shoot. That's not what you intimated. You said, "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way translates into police encountering a live shooter. Again, police often show up after the fact. You want them to find the suspect and kill them.

So now you read my mind? Innocent until proven guilty. But if you're in the act of shooting others or rape, you're guilty and shout be killed. Never said "find and kill" that is your odd interpretation. If someone said, Faun killed Bob, the should not find and kill you. If you pull a knife on em and charge then you're fair game. I forget how literal you are. It is a sign of stupidity.

LOL

You don't have a mind to read. All I can go by is what you post and all you posted was, "1000 is not enough" and "if we kill more criminals there will be less crime." That in no way is limited to the rare occurrence where police engage an active shooter.

But I understand why you're backpedaling so furiously now.

You're hopeless. I want fewer criminals. You want more victims. Enjoy.

LOL

Your dementia is noted and laughed at. In the meantime, your hopes and dreams of cops killing people they encounter are dashed.

I said "criminals"...not people not suspects. Learn to read.

All people police arrest are suspects. Don't you even read what you write?? "Innocent until proven guilty."

And if they see someone shoot, stab or rape then they are criminals. Sorry. Shoot them.

Suspects in name only. So if you were a cop you would just try to arrest some guy shooting innocents? OK....I want cops to shoot the criminals.

Of the roughly 1000 people killed by police over the last year, how many were killed in the process of the criminal killing or raping someone else?

Idk you tell me. I d say at least 90% posed a direct danger to the police officers or other civilians.