Marine Corps. Rebukes Pelosi: “WE DON’T WORK FOR YOU!”

[Concerned American]

Marine Corps. Rebukes Pelosi: “WE DON’T WORK FOR YOU!” | Real Raw News

Pelosi said she wanted “battle ready” reinforcements because “radicalized Trump supporters

and kooky Qanon conspiracy people” were about to converge on D.C. She implored him to reconsider, arguing that it was the general’s patriotic duty to quell uprisings and guarantee Biden’s ascension to the Oval Office.

Her statement made the general explode, our source said.

“Don’t lecture me on patriotism, Madam Speaker. I’ve served this country with distinction for 40 years. I’ve spilled blood for our nation. What have you, a self-serving elected official, done for your country?” Gen. Berger said.

Pelosi further enraged him by saying he was answerable to Congress.

“I answer only to the president, and as I understand it, Donald J. Trump is still president and commander-in-chief. I abide in the Constitution as it was written, not your interpretation of it,” Gen. Berger admonished Pelosi.
-------------------------------------------
Good on him

Pelousy is in total delusion since it has been shown that Trump people did little or none of the rioting of the Capital building.

Why oh why is it so much easier for you to believe an anonymous source quoted in Realrawstory than in the Washington Post? Because you like what it says?

The reason we don't believe it isn't that the General couldn't think that, but you don't become a General by making USMB-type rants to high ranking politicos. He wouldn't say it, is all we mean.

WAPOST is full if shit 90% of the time, I can accept if the rawstory is bogus, but it is illegal to make false quotes of someone allegedly saying it.

I wish what happened last week would convince people to take the time to actually refute this type of bullshit when it gets posted up as news. Pelosi and General Berger BOTH should make a joint statement that this conversation never took place. And have their lawyers fire off a letter demanding an immediate retraction.

We are just going to allow this garbage mill of alternate facts and lies to churn on, and we will once again pay for it. It's disgusting.

You should have been demanding the same thing for the last four years and continue with demanding that the tech/social media fake news stop as well. Repeal 230.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

She really scares the hell out of you guys because she is such an intelligent patriot. All that you wish you were.

She wants to send battle ready troops into a volatile situation where they can gun down other Americans. Yeah that's really showing that she's a "intelligent patriot".

She already has FBI, DEA, NSA, state troopers, sheriffs, police, and even secret service, to call on.

She can deal with it using the resources she has available instead of turning the troops into bad guys in her power play.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Concerned American]

She really scares the hell out of you guys because she is such an intelligent patriot. All that you wish you were.

View attachment 443385

She wants to send battle ready troops into a volatile situation where they can gun down other Americans. Yeah that's really showing that she's a "intelligent patriot".

She already has FBI, DEA, NSA, state troopers, sheriffs, police, and even secret service, to call on.

She can deal with it using the resources she has available instead of turning the troops into bad guys in her power play.

*****SMILE*****

Yep, She is fixing to make Kent State look like child's play.

 

[Coyote]

She really scares the hell out of you guys because she is such an intelligent patriot. All that you wish you were.

View attachment 443385

She wants to send battle ready troops into a volatile situation where they can gun down other Americans. Yeah that's really showing that she's a "intelligent patriot".

She already has FBI, DEA, NSA, state troopers, sheriffs, police, and even secret service, to call on.

She can deal with it using the resources she has available instead of turning the troops into bad guys in her power play.

*****SMILE*****

Hold on...isn't that what Trump wanted to do?

 

[Coyote]

I'm just curious...given all the verifiable threats and intelligence documenting potentially serious violence, how best do you go about protecting a president and president elect?

I oppose having active duty military involved by the way.

I have never seen anything like this in my lifetime. And all 50 state capitals are in heightened state of security.

 

[OldLady]

I'm just curious...given all the verifiable threats and intelligence documenting potentially serious violence, how best do you go about protecting a president and president elect?

I oppose having active duty military involved by the way.

I have never seen anything like this in my lifetime. And all 50 state capitals are in heightened state of security.

Are the Guard part of the active military you oppose?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

If something happens it will be groups like ANTIFA, BLM, the far alt left, and the far alt right, not the simple Trump supporters. I'm sure most to the old Tea Party and Deplorables will avoid being anywhere near the capitol or state capitols the next few days.

*****SMILE*****

 

[BlindBoo]

My Pentagon source, speaking under promise of anonymity, that means I can't tell you his name, told me their source was full of shit.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Marine Corps. Rebukes Pelosi: “WE DON’T WORK FOR YOU!” | Real Raw News

Pelosi said she wanted “battle ready” reinforcements because “radicalized Trump supporters

and kooky Qanon conspiracy people” were about to converge on D.C. She implored him to reconsider, arguing that it was the general’s patriotic duty to quell uprisings and guarantee Biden’s ascension to the Oval Office.

Her statement made the general explode, our source said.

“Don’t lecture me on patriotism, Madam Speaker. I’ve served this country with distinction for 40 years. I’ve spilled blood for our nation. What have you, a self-serving elected official, done for your country?” Gen. Berger said.

Pelosi further enraged him by saying he was answerable to Congress.

“I answer only to the president, and as I understand it, Donald J. Trump is still president and commander-in-chief. I abide in the Constitution as it was written, not your interpretation of it,” Gen. Berger admonished Pelosi.
-------------------------------------------
Good on him

considering real raw news is a questionable source,
and the joint chiefs confirm biden as 46th.
this is probably fake news.

What do you think one has to do with the other? These days all sources are questionable.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Marine Corps. Rebukes Pelosi: “WE DON’T WORK FOR YOU!” | Real Raw News

Pelosi said she wanted “battle ready” reinforcements because “radicalized Trump supporters

and kooky Qanon conspiracy people” were about to converge on D.C. She implored him to reconsider, arguing that it was the general’s patriotic duty to quell uprisings and guarantee Biden’s ascension to the Oval Office.

Her statement made the general explode, our source said.

“Don’t lecture me on patriotism, Madam Speaker. I’ve served this country with distinction for 40 years. I’ve spilled blood for our nation. What have you, a self-serving elected official, done for your country?” Gen. Berger said.

Pelosi further enraged him by saying he was answerable to Congress.

“I answer only to the president, and as I understand it, Donald J. Trump is still president and commander-in-chief. I abide in the Constitution as it was written, not your interpretation of it,” Gen. Berger admonished Pelosi.
-------------------------------------------
Good on him

Pelousy is in total delusion since it has been shown that Trump people did little or none of the rioting of the Capital building.

Why oh why is it so much easier for you to believe an anonymous source quoted in Realrawstory than in the Washington Post? Because you like what it says?

The reason we don't believe it isn't that the General couldn't think that, but you don't become a General by making USMB-type rants to high ranking politicos. He wouldn't say it, is all we mean.

WAPOST is full if shit 90% of the time, I can accept if the rawstory is bogus, but it is illegal to make false quotes of someone allegedly saying it.

I wish what happened last week would convince people to take the time to actually refute this type of bullshit when it gets posted up as news. Pelosi and General Berger BOTH should make a joint statement that this conversation never took place. And have their lawyers fire off a letter demanding an immediate retraction.

We are just going to allow this garbage mill of alternate facts and lies to churn on, and we will once again pay for it. It's disgusting.

If it didn't happen refute it. Somebody stopping you? Maybe it's the truth stopping you. Something isn't bogus just because you don't like it. I have had (mostly one-sided) discussions with Generals and he is reported as saying exactly what I would expect a Marine General to respond when presented with an illegal demand like Pelosi's and I gave up expecting her to say anything legal logical or intelligent long ago so I certainly wouldn't put it past her.

 

[Coyote]

I'm just curious...given all the verifiable threats and intelligence documenting potentially serious violence, how best do you go about protecting a president and president elect?

I oppose having active duty military involved by the way.

I have never seen anything like this in my lifetime. And all 50 state capitals are in heightened state of security.

Are the Guard part of the active military you oppose?

No

 

[9thIDdoc]

Marine Corps. Rebukes Pelosi: “WE DON’T WORK FOR YOU!” | Real Raw News

Pelosi said she wanted “battle ready” reinforcements because “radicalized Trump supporters

and kooky Qanon conspiracy people” were about to converge on D.C. She implored him to reconsider, arguing that it was the general’s patriotic duty to quell uprisings and guarantee Biden’s ascension to the Oval Office.

Her statement made the general explode, our source said.

“Don’t lecture me on patriotism, Madam Speaker. I’ve served this country with distinction for 40 years. I’ve spilled blood for our nation. What have you, a self-serving elected official, done for your country?” Gen. Berger said.

Pelosi further enraged him by saying he was answerable to Congress.

“I answer only to the president, and as I understand it, Donald J. Trump is still president and commander-in-chief. I abide in the Constitution as it was written, not your interpretation of it,” Gen. Berger admonished Pelosi.
-------------------------------------------
Good on him

Pelousy is in total delusion since it has been shown that Trump people did little or none of the rioting of the Capital building.

Why oh why is it so much easier for you to believe an anonymous source quoted in Realrawstory than in the Washington Post? Because you like what it says?

The reason we don't believe it isn't that the General couldn't think that, but you don't become a General by making USMB-type rants to high ranking politicos. He wouldn't say it, is all we mean.

That...and the fact that the story says he refused her the Guard's help but ummmm there's 15,000 of them there to do just that.

That...and the fact that the story says he refused her the Guard's help but ummmm there's 15,000 of them there to do just that.

Try reading the story.

i dont click cultist links, nutbag she wanted the guard there...the guard is there.

She wanted the MARINES there, in addition to the Guard.

If you're not going to click on a link, don't opine on it.

Ask yourself:

Why would she even ask the marines to be there, when she knows under the constitution, that is the duty of the national guard?

Why would this alleged Inside anonymous source go to a conspiracy site called Real Raw Source to give them an exclusive?

Also from the article:

A Pentagon source speaking under promise of anonymity told Real Raw News that Pelosi

contacted Gen. Berger late Monday night, and she beseeched him to commit 5,000 troops to help ensure a peaceful transition of power and to prevent a repeat of the Jan 6 siege of the Capitol. Gen. Berger, our source said, didn’t understand why Pelosi needed additional soldiers to augment an already impressive force assembled by federal and state officials. That force includes 15,000 National Guard from D.C., Delaware, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island, and an undisclosed number of FBI and DHS agents who arrived in D.C. Sunday night.

 

[9thIDdoc]

I'm just curious...given all the verifiable threats and intelligence documenting potentially serious violence, how best do you go about protecting a president and president elect?

I oppose having active duty military involved by the way.

I have never seen anything like this in my lifetime. And all 50 state capitals are in heightened state of security.

I doubt the military will become involved in shooting more civilians at this point. I think the next probable escalation will come when left and right wing militias open fire on each other with civilians or alleged civilians caught in the crossfire. Naturally each side will blame the other and there will be a bloodbath then and continuing indefinitely. I hope I am wrong.

 

[BluesLegend]

Rot in hell Pelosi you stupid old hag.

She really scares the hell out of you guys because she is such an intelligent patriot. All that you wish you were.

Ahahahaha Pelosi once ranted on the House floor that the CIA was out to make her look bad. Her Dem colleagues had to escort her back to her office to stop the embarrassment. This is on video go look it up its hilarious.

 

[bodecea]

Rot in hell Pelosi you stupid old hag.

The Speaker who crushed trump.

 

[BluesLegend]

Rot in hell Pelosi you stupid old hag.

The Speaker who crushed trump.

Wake up from your dream lib. This is where I rub your nose in Trump replacing justice Ginsberg

 

[Magnus]

Fact check: Marine Corps did not ‘rebuke’ Nancy Pelosi
By Reuters Staff

An article circulating on social media claims that the Marine Corps ‘rebuked’ U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and told her ‘we don’t work for you’. This report is false.

The story was first published by Real Raw News on Jan. 13 here (archived version: archive.vn/pHHtn ) and has since been replicated in different websites, that refer to the publication as the source ( here , here , here , here , here ).

Citing an alleged “Pentagon source speaking under promise of anonymity”, the article claims that General David H. Berger, Commandant of the United States Marine Corps ( twitter.com/cmc_marinecorps ) “refused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s request to use the Corps to safeguard Biden’s Jan. 20 inauguration from Trump Supporters and insurrectionists”.

Reuters found no further reports to support this claim nor any coverage of the alleged exchange. Real Raw News could not be reached for comment at the time of this article’s publication.

Capt Casey Littesy, Communication Strategy and Operations Officer for the Headquarters Marine Corps told Reuters via email that the article is “unequivocally false and inaccurate”.

Drew Hammill, a spokesman for Pelosi said in an email to Reuters that the article is “false”.

In a joint statement here with the top U.S. military leaders, General David H. Berger, condemned the Capitol riots and also said that President-elect Joe Biden would be inaugurated on Jan. 20 and become their commander in chief ( here ).

LT Brown, a spokesperson for the Joint Task Force–National Capital Region, a joint service command charged with providing ceremonial and public affairs support to the 59th presidential inauguration, ( here ) told Reuters via email that Marines assigned to the JTF-NCR units are “solely providing ceremonial support”.

Fact check: Marine Corps did not ârebukeâ Nancy Pelosi

An article circulating on social media claims that the Marine Corps ‘rebuked’ U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and told her ‘we don’t work for you’. This report is false.

www.reuters.com

 

[Ben Thomson]

Marine Corps. Rebukes Pelosi: “WE DON’T WORK FOR YOU!” | Real Raw News

Pelosi said she wanted “battle ready” reinforcements because “radicalized Trump supporters

and kooky Qanon conspiracy people” were about to converge on D.C. She implored him to reconsider, arguing that it was the general’s patriotic duty to quell uprisings and guarantee Biden’s ascension to the Oval Office.

Her statement made the general explode, our source said.

“Don’t lecture me on patriotism, Madam Speaker. I’ve served this country with distinction for 40 years. I’ve spilled blood for our nation. What have you, a self-serving elected official, done for your country?” Gen. Berger said.

Pelosi further enraged him by saying he was answerable to Congress.

“I answer only to the president, and as I understand it, Donald J. Trump is still president and commander-in-chief. I abide in the Constitution as it was written, not your interpretation of it,” Gen. Berger admonished Pelosi.
-------------------------------------------
Good on him

If true it sounds like a certain general might be retiring early. He diffidently sounds like a 'more patriotic than thou' insurrectionist sympathizer. Which is why I doubt it is true.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It is always fake news for you the lefties still if everyone could see it you stay blind .

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Fact check: Marine Corps did not ‘rebuke’ Nancy Pelosi
By Reuters Staff

An article circulating on social media claims that the Marine Corps ‘rebuked’ U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and told her ‘we don’t work for you’. This report is false.

The story was first published by Real Raw News on Jan. 13 here (archived version: archive.vn/pHHtn ) and has since been replicated in different websites, that refer to the publication as the source ( here , here , here , here , here ).

Citing an alleged “Pentagon source speaking under promise of anonymity”, the article claims that General David H. Berger, Commandant of the United States Marine Corps ( twitter.com/cmc_marinecorps ) “refused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s request to use the Corps to safeguard Biden’s Jan. 20 inauguration from Trump Supporters and insurrectionists”.

Reuters found no further reports to support this claim nor any coverage of the alleged exchange. Real Raw News could not be reached for comment at the time of this article’s publication.

Capt Casey Littesy, Communication Strategy and Operations Officer for the Headquarters Marine Corps told Reuters via email that the article is “unequivocally false and inaccurate”.

Drew Hammill, a spokesman for Pelosi said in an email to Reuters that the article is “false”.

In a joint statement here with the top U.S. military leaders, General David H. Berger, condemned the Capitol riots and also said that President-elect Joe Biden would be inaugurated on Jan. 20 and become their commander in chief ( here ).

LT Brown, a spokesperson for the Joint Task Force–National Capital Region, a joint service command charged with providing ceremonial and public affairs support to the 59th presidential inauguration, ( here ) told Reuters via email that Marines assigned to the JTF-NCR units are “solely providing ceremonial support”.

Fact check: Marine Corps did not ârebukeâ Nancy Pelosi

An article circulating on social media claims that the Marine Corps ‘rebuked’ U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and told her ‘we don’t work for you’. This report is false.

www.reuters.com

Reauters a mouthpiece for the government and you swallow it hook ,line and sinker.lol