Making America Great Again: Reinstating the 1790 Naturalization Act Where ONLY White People Became Citizens

Another blanket statement from a complete fool. What specific racist laws have Republicans passed recently? Do tell. LOL

You are quickly becoming the dumbest person on this board.
Their voter ID laws have been continually judged to be racist for one.
 
That's not what a fact is you idiot... 😄

I'm at least intelligent enough to recognize my assessment of Republican voters is a representation of my opinion. You sure you went to Duke?
You and intelligent should never be used in the same sentence, you brainwashed fool. I am still waiting for you to find one racist post from me on this board. You can't. You suck. Loser.
 
I disagree with Libertarians, but they are mostly correct in that government is always invasive and dangerous, and the more centralized, the worse the risk from government becomes.
The only reason why big central government is justified at all is that the threats to individuals are getting bigger all the time, like multi national corporations.
The biggest problems we face in the US are all from the over reaching of the federal government, and were done by democrats. The includes foreign wars, the federal War on Drugs, the 1994 Federal crime act with mandatory sentences, 3 strikes, etc.
Centralization is not the way to go.
We need things like public health care, but it should be local, not federal.
I believe in free markets. The Govt should provide: Police; Fire; Roads; Military.

THAT IS IT.
 
That's not what a fact is you idiot... 😄

I'm at least intelligent enough to recognize my assessment of Republican voters is a representation of my opinion. You sure you went to Duke?

But looking back at democrats like Johnson and Vietnam, Hillary and the Arab Spring, etc., the democratic party looks worse than the republicans in some ways.
It was Biden who penned the awful 1994 Federal Crime Act, and it was Bill Clinton who signed it.
It also was Hillary in 1993 who proposed the mandatory private health insurance that got into Obamacare.
I am not very happy with the democratic party, at all.
 
I disagree with Libertarians, but they are mostly correct in that government is always invasive and dangerous, and the more centralized, the worse the risk from government becomes.
I've found Libertarians to be mostly idiots who believe in natural market forces despite the market being entirely artificial. Yes, stronger governments are more dangerous than ineffectual ones but then the people living in areas of ineffectual governments face different dangers. It's a pick your poison sort of scenario more than some profound realization of government.
The only reason why big central government is justified at all is that the threats to individuals are getting bigger all the time, like multi national corporations.
The rise of multi-national corporations and large, regulating governments coincides with the vast decrease in death by starvation and famine around the world. Multi-national corporations are the culmination of cooperative networks that encompass millions of people world wide to produce and move goods all across the world. That includes food and medical supplies. I'm not arguing they are benevolent but they are tools and they can be used for good and bad. But that goes for government as well.
The biggest problems we face in the US are all from the over reaching of the federal government, and were done by democrats. The includes foreign wars, the federal War on Drugs, the 1994 Federal crime act with mandatory sentences, 3 strikes, etc.
Centralization is not the way to go.
We need things like public health care, but it should be local, not federal.
Those things were also largely approved by Republican congressmen as well. The reason why dividing up government duties between federal, state and city governments works better is the same reason capitalism is better than socialist dictatorships, more avenues to success. The more people trying to do the same thing the more results we are going to get and we can see who's ideas work better. I agree that a diversity of options will more likely lead to finding optimal answers for human problems but that ignores that that isn't everyone intention in government. Some people don't care about those problems and are only looking for reasons to grift and that can happen at the local, state or federal level.
 
We need to go back to private police and fire departments. Then the poor get no help. And married women should not be allowed to own property.

We probably should not have any police at all, but fire departments were almost always public because fire always threatens everyone, not just one property. Fire departments were usually volunteer.
Married women always were allowed to own property because of dowery rights.
Many cultures, like Judaism, do inheritance along maternal lines, because they are the only way to be sure of parentage.
 
That is the Democratic Party being racist, stating blacks are too stupid to get an ID. I find that preposterous. Thank you for your proof that the Democratic Party is racist. Next.


Are YouTube videos the place you go to inform yourself? 😄

Can you post evidence of a Democrat saying black people are too stupid to get IDs?
 
We probably should not have any police at all, but fire departments were almost always public because fire always threatens everyone, not just one property. Fire departments were usually volunteer.
Married women always were allowed to own property because of dowery rights.
Many cultures, like Judaism, do inheritance along maternal lines, because they are the only way to be sure of parentage.
I was responding sarcastically to teh op, which hopefully was creating in a joking manner, but .....


 
Are you too stupid to click on them? Men are visual persons, I am providing you visual material. What do you prefer?


I did, I just don't think a guy going around asking people a loaded question, editing that video and presenting his edited version of what he thinks best makes his case is an actual convincing argument to anyone but morons.
 
We're in a constitutional crisis with a Usurper at the helm. He's opened the funnel at the southern border. Illegal aliens are now an existential threat to the people the founders cherished, free White people. When free White people's existence are threatened, it's a national security issue. The brilliant founders of White European heritage wanted to instill their beliefs for eternity. It is written. It's a duty to all America First nationalists who want to make America great again to understand what the first Congress meant when establishing the 1790 Naturalization Act. Here it is.:

[Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) is law of the United States Congress that sets the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limits naturalization to "free White person(s) ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free black people and Asians.]

How brilliant they were wanting the new country to be a White nation for Whites who could be free from tyranny from the British tyrants they escaped from. Trump's triumphant return will solidify the 1790 Naturalization Act once and for all.

Whites have been leaders in building western civilization and putting White men on the moon thanks to Wernher Von Braun, a Nazi. It's true.
Congratulations on what may be the best GOP thread in a long time.
 
I did, I just don't think a guy going around asking people a loaded question, editing that video and presenting his edited version of what he thinks best makes his case is an actual convincing argument to anyone but morons.
It wasn't a loaded question. It was a simple and direct one. You use the word "moron" frequently. You are definitely a moron.
 
It wasn't a loaded question. It was a simple and direct one. You use the word "moron" frequently. You are definitely a moron.
It was and it was an edited video. That's not a convincing argument. A more convincing one is the ruling made by North Carolina courts, federal appeals courts and finally the supreme court, that found North Carolina Republicans "targeted black voters with surgical precision".

See the real issue isn't that black voters are too stupid to get IDs, it's that Republican legislatures try to disqualify IDs black voters are more likely to have and use to vote.
 
It wasn't a loaded question. It was a simple and direct one. You use the word "moron" frequently. You are definitely a moron.
Well, you do have your own moron wall of fame. It's not really conducive, imo.

But I think the argument was that voter id had a "racial effect." I don't really think many black people are deterred from voting, but I don't think many people in either party of any race illegally vote.

Native Americans on reservations may not have drivers licenses. I don't really know.
 

Forum List

Back
Top