Making America Great Again: Reinstating the 1790 Naturalization Act Where ONLY White People Became Citizens

[AzogtheDefiler]

It was and it was an edited video. That's not a convincing argument. A more convincing one is the ruling made by North Carolina courts, federal appeals courts and finally the supreme court, that found North Carolina Republicans "targeted black voters with surgical precision".

See the real issue isn't that black voters are too stupid to get IDs, it's that Republican legislatures try to disqualify IDs black voters are more likely to have and use to vote.

So you believe whites can get IDs and blacks cannot? That is a you problem and a racist statement.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We're in a constitutional crisis with a Usurper at the helm. He's opened the funnel at the southern border. Illegal aliens are now an existential threat to the people the founders cherished, free White people. When free White people's existence are threatened, it's a national security issue. The brilliant founders of White European heritage wanted to instill their beliefs for eternity. It is written. It's a duty to all America First nationalists who want to make America great again to understand what the first Congress meant when establishing the 1790 Naturalization Act. Here it is.:

[Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) is law of the United States Congress that sets the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limits naturalization to "free White person(s) ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free black people and Asians.]

How brilliant they were wanting the new country to be a White nation for Whites who could be free from tyranny from the British tyrants they escaped from. Trump's triumphant return will solidify the 1790 Naturalization Act once and for all.

Whites have been leaders in building western civilization and putting White men on the moon thanks to Wernher Von Braun, a Nazi. It's true.

Attaboy Biff_Poindexter we couldn't even tell this was you sock account!

 

[Curried Goats]

So you believe whites can get IDs and blacks cannot? That is a you problem and a racist statement.

That's not what the ruling said. It found Republicans looked up what sort of IDs black voters where more likely to have and tried to eliminate them. Do you not know how to read? Is that the problem? In this case, those black voters had IDs you moron.

 

[Rigby5]

I've found Libertarians to be mostly idiots who believe in natural market forces despite the market being entirely artificial. Yes, stronger governments are more dangerous than ineffectual ones but then the people living in areas of ineffectual governments face different dangers. It's a pick your poison sort of scenario more than some profound realization of government.

The rise of multi-national corporations and large, regulating governments coincides with the vast decrease in death by starvation and famine around the world. Multi-national corporations are the culmination of cooperative networks that encompass millions of people world wide to produce and move goods all across the world. That includes food and medical supplies. I'm not arguing they are benevolent but they are tools and they can be used for good and bad. But that goes for government as well.

Those things were also largely approved by Republican congressmen as well. The reason why dividing up government duties between federal, state and city governments works better is the same reason capitalism is better than socialist dictatorships, more avenues to success. The more people trying to do the same thing the more results we are going to get and we can see who's ideas work better. I agree that a diversity of options will more likely lead to finding optimal answers for human problems but that ignores that that isn't everyone intention in government. Some people don't care about those problems and are only looking for reasons to grift and that can happen at the local, state or federal level.

I agree with much of your motivations, but you still show total ignorance of basics.
Your use of the phrase "socialist dictatorship" show a total lack of understanding.
Socialism is when people do something local, collectively, so it can NEVER be a dictatorship.
Total contradiction in terms.
Dictatorships are always centralized and profit motivated, so are inherently capitalist.
Socialism has to always be local and democratic.

The fact everyone uses and abuses words like "socialism" is because they are trying to pretend to be nice.
That does not mean the words mean what the pretenders try to make them seem.
But there is no danger greater than allowing word abuse.
It controls your thoughts.
That is the point of Orwell's "1984".
Don't let people use words wrong.
It is absolutely impossible to have a "socialist dictatorship".
The 2 words are complete opposites.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

That's not what the ruling said. It found Republicans looked up what sort of IDs black voters where more likely to have and tried to eliminate them. Do you not know how to read? Is that the problem? In this case, those black voters had IDs you moron.

That is the court's opinion it isn't a fact. I asked YOU a question. Do you believe whites can get IDs and blacks cannot? Well? Moron.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I agree with much of your motivations, but you still show total ignorance of basics.
Your use of the phrase "socialist dictatorship" show a total lack of understanding.
Socialism is when people do something local, collectively, so it can NEVER be a dictatorship.
Total contradiction in terms.
Dictatorships are always centralized and profit motivated, so are inherently capitalist.
Socialism has to always be local and democratic.

The fact everyone uses and abuses words like "socialism" is because they are trying to pretend to be nice.
That does not mean the words mean what the pretenders try to make them seem.
But there is no danger greater than allowing word abuse.
It controls your thoughts.
That is the point of Orwell's "1984".
Don't let people use words wrong.
It is absolutely impossible to have a "socialist dictatorship".
The 2 words are complete opposites.

Curried Goats doesn't understand the meaning of what a totalitarian Gov't is vs. a true commonwealth or socialism.

 

[Curried Goats]

I agree with much of your motivations, but you still show total ignorance of basics.
Your use of the phrase "socialist dictatorship" show a total lack of understanding.
Socialism is when people do something local, collectively, so it can NEVER be a dictatorship.
Total contradiction in terms.

Socialism is when the means of production and distribution are owned by the "people" rather than private entities. If the "people" are respresented by a dictator then you get a socialist dictatorship. They aren't a contradiction in terms.

Dictatorships are always centralized and profit motivated, so are inherently capitalist.
Socialism has to always be local and democratic.

When it is it's democratic socialism as opposed to a socialist dictatorship.

The fact everyone uses and abuses words like "socialism" is because they are trying to pretend to be nice.

I don't know what this means.

That does not mean the words mean what the pretenders try to make them seem.
But there is no danger greater than allowing word abuse.
It controls your thoughts.
That is the point of Orwell's "1984".
Don't let people use words wrong.

I'm sure some dictators do think they are best person to decide what's best for the people of their nation.

It is absolutely impossible to have a "socialist dictatorship".
The 2 words are complete opposites.

No they aren't. One is describing the economic mechanism of society, (whether individuals or the government produces good and services) and the other is describing who runs the government. They are actually describing different aspects of society.

 

[Curried Goats]

That is the court's opinion it isn't a fact. I asked YOU a question. Do you believe whites can get IDs and blacks cannot? Well? Moron.

I don't think black voters are incapable of getting IDs that whites have. I do think Republican politicians are trying to eliminate IDs black voters have in order to place more obstacles in their path in order for them to cast a vote and a court agrees with me. Do you think the courts opinion was wrong? If so, why?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I don't think black voters are incapable of getting IDs that whites have. I do think Republican politicians are trying to eliminate IDs black voters have in order to place more obstacles in their path in order for them to cast a vote and a court agrees with me. Do you think the courts opinion was wrong? If so, why?

Blacks and whites are equals. Period. End of story. Democratic Party says otherwise to garner votes. I despise those who use race as a crutch. An opinion cannot be wrong. I never said it was wrong. I said, I disagree with it because the premise of the case was faulty. Black people vote Republican too.

 

[Curried Goats]

Blacks and whites are equals. Period. End of story. Democratic Party says otherwise to garner votes. I despise those who use race as a crutch. An opinion cannot be wrong. I never said it was wrong. I said, I disagree with it because the premise of the case was faulty. Black people vote Republican too.

Black people don't vote Republican by anything more than 10% which isn't something to be bragging about and I answered your question you coward, why are you dodging the facts of the case and attempting to deflect. Republican politicians targeted IDs black voters had and tried to eliminate them.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Black people don't vote Republican by anything more than 10% which isn't something to be bragging about and I answered your question you coward, why are you dodging the facts of the case and attempting to deflect. Republicans politicians targeted IDs black voters have and tried to eliminate them.

10% now but it could easily shift. I already explained my positions several times. I stand by what I said. Republicans didn’t target anyone. Not all Republicans are the same. And again, I disagree with the courts opinion. You keep dancing. You called me a racist. Find one racist post from me. Or STFU and admit you were talking out of your ass.

 

[Curried Goats]

10% now but it could easily shift. I already explained my positions several times. I stand by what I said. Republicans didn’t target anyone. Not all Republicans are the same. And again, I disagree with the courts opinion. You keep dancing. You called me a racist. Find one racist post from me. Or STFU and admit you were talking out of your ass.

I don't have to get a racist like you to admit you're a racist to prove it. According to a court Republicans in North Carolina did target black voters. Why were they wrong? According to records Republicans looked up country records for IDs that black people were most likely to use to vote and tried to eliminate them. That's fairly blatant. Any reason for your disagreement with the court other than your continued attempts to downplay Republican racism?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I don't have to get a racist like you to admit you're a racist to prove it. According to a court Republicans in North Carolina did target black voters. Why were they wrong? According to records Republicans looked up country records for IDs that black people were most likely to use to vote and tried to eliminate them. That's fairly blatant. Any reason for your disagreement with the court other than your continued attempts to downplay Republican racism?

Well you’re a Holocaust denier. I do Not have proof but I ll state as such anyway. You also enjoy masturbating while watching Schindlers List. Two can play this game, little moron. See how you like it. Since in your world, proof is irrelevant.

 

[whitehall]

More ignorant bigotry on the left. The radical left wing crazies convinced themselves that the only skin color south of Texas is "black".

 

[Curried Goats]

Well you’re a Holocaust denier. I do Not have proof but I ll state as such anyway. You also enjoy masturbating while watching Schindlers List. Two can play this game, little moron. See how you like it. Since in your world, proof is irrelevant.

I and the court have proof Republicans targeted black voters with surgical precision. You stated you don't believe this is the case, can you explain why looking up what IDs black voters are more likely to have and trying to eliminate them isn't targeting black voters? Im asking you to explain things you yourself claim to believe, not things I've made up that you believe you dumb fuck.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I and the court have proof Republicans targeted black voters with surgical precision. You stated you don't believe this is the case, can you explain why looking up what IDs black voters are more likely to have and trying to eliminate them isn't targeting black voters? Im asking you to explain things you yourself claim to believe, not things I've made up that you believe you dumb fuck.

We are talking about you and I . You said I was racist. Prove it. I say You’re a Jew hating bigot. I already Explained that blacks and whites are equals. Too bad you don’t see it that way.

 

[Curried Goats]

We are talking about you and I . You said I was racist. Prove it. I say You’re a Jew hating bigot.

I am. One point of evidence is your refusal to acknowledge blatant Republican racism, like the targeting of black voters with racist ID laws.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I am. One point of evidence is your refusal to acknowledge blatant Republican racism, like the targeting of black voters with racist ID laws.

ID laws aren’t racist. Not all Republicans are the same and neither are all Democrats. You support an overtly Antisemitic organization. You’re a Jew hating prick. My POV.

 

[Curried Goats]

ID laws aren’t racist. Not all Republicans are the same and neither are all Democrats. You support an overtly Antisemitic organization. You’re a Jew hating prick. My POV.

The ID law I linked to was indeed racist and ruled so by a court. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that simple fact?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The ID law I linked to was indeed racist and ruled so by a court. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that simple fact?

So the NC court unanimously said it was racist? And you’re dancing again. Typical leftist stooge. I told you that I disagree with the opinion of the court. Like many on your side whine about Roe vs. Wade. Courts aren’t perfect. Only thing simple around here is your mind.