Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sure he is. But as long as slimeball Garland is the AG, he won't be touched.The only Democrat that qualifies at the moment is Menendez. And the justice system will get around to him as well.
(Sorry, Biden ain't one of them. )
Like I said, my answer wouldn't change.Got it. So you really are stupid enough to believe that question has no bias in the way it was stated.
You really are a fucking idiot. Thanks for playing, simp.
Did I say it would change my answer? Quote me saying that, stupid ass.Like I said, my answer wouldn't change.
I guess I have a shit-ton more cognitive skills than you.
Sorry for you ignorance.
Yes, that’s why there are hearings in Congress about Biden and the Big Guy payments from payoffs that originated from America’s enemies.Call me old fashioned but I thought Americans would want to know if they’re about to vote for a criminal or not.
The ones where there’s been no actual evidence of any actual crimes?Yes, that’s why there are hearings in Congress about Biden and the Big Guy payments from payoffs that originated from America’s enemies.
Is that why they did not prosecute Hillary Clinton?Call me old fashioned but I thought Americans would want to know if they’re about to vote for a criminal or not.
I answered your question three times. You don’t like the answer, tough shit.You’re the one bringing them up, not me.
I asked you a simple question and you’re still dancing.
“Let me go look at a recent clip of a congressional hearing, and see if I should be required to give you a yes, or no answer.”I answered your question three times. You don’t like the answer, tough shit.
Just justice catching up with him. Long overdue.
Ya' think?Majority of voters say Biden is trying to jail Trump before the election.
Invest in a dictionary, dumbass.Damn, you're a dull one.
Try posting something relevant next time, dumbass.
So, let's see just who DID do the survey..and just how impartial they are, shall we? Looks to me like these guys are Republican strategists..and not impartial at all. So, given that they give no info at all as to methodology...and that their motives are quite clear...I'm not going to give their 'poll' any credibility..not to mention the weird way the poll question was asked.No stupid, the majority of Americans. The Examiner had nothing to do with the survey.
Learn to read, Dumbass.
My answer is not a yes or no. It is what I said it is. Don't like it? Try growing up.“Let me go look at a recent clip of a congressional hearing, and see if I should be required to give you a yes, or no answer.”
So you’re just entirely full of shit. Gotcha.
You seem triggered your lil word game wasn’t able to sway my thinking. Must suck to be as stupid as you are.Did I say it would change my answer? Quote me saying that, stupid ass.
I said it was phrased in a biased way. That's a fact that you're apparently too fucking stupid to understand, simp. You're actually stupid enough to believe that this isn't biased: "Donald Trump faces 91 criminal offenses. His own vice president will not endorse him for the upcoming election. Numerous officials in his administration resigned due to his actions on January 6th. Do you support Donald Trump?"
Wow, you uneducated MAGA fools are ridiculously stupid. Go educate yourself, simp.
Their methodology is easy to find, if you have a functioning brain. They even break down who they surveyed based on 19 different categories. For instance, they asked:So, let's see just who DID do the survey..and just how impartial they are, shall we? Looks to me like these guys are Republican strategists..and not impartial at all. So, given that they give no info at all as to methodology...and that their motives are quite clear...I'm not going to give their 'poll' any credibility..not to mention the weird way the poll question was asked.
I think we all know that they didn't ask a 'majority of Americans' anything.
About McLaughlin & Associates | McLaughlin & Associates
Public Opinion, Survey Research, Strategic Consulting, Media Buying for Corporate Clients and Political Campaigns.mclaughlinonline.com
John McLaughlin
CEO and Partner
John McLaughlin has worked professionally as a strategic consultant and pollster for over 35 years. During this time he has earned a reputation for helping some of America’s most successful corporations and winning some of the toughest elections in the nation. In 2016 John worked as an advisor and pollster for Donald Trump from the primaries through election day. His political clients have included former Presidential candidates Steve Forbes and Fred Thompson, former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, former Georgia Governor Nathan Deal and 22 current and former U.S. Senators and 16 current Republican members of Congress.
Internationally, John has done work in Israel for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, The Conservative Party in the United Kingdom, former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada and he advised Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in his 2018 landslide re-election.
Jim McLaughlin
President and Partner
Mr. McLaughlin has been called a “Big Winner” by a leading political magazine for his work on some of the top races in the country. McLaughlin was one of only two Republican pollsters named as a part of Roll Call Newspapers’ Fabulous Fifty for his work and was also profiled as a “Mover and Shaker” by Campaigns and Elections Magazine. Mr. McLaughlin has worked on some of the top races in the country. During this past election cycle, he helped to elect President Donald J. Trump and McLaughlin & Associates helped win 5 of the 10 toughest congressional races in the country according to one respected publication. McLaughlin also helped to elect several other statewide GOP office holders that ranged from Governor, US Senate to Attorney General. McLaughlin & Associates has also been widely accredited for its accurate polling in predicting a Donald Trump victory.
I wouldn’t expect you to sway you’re thinking about Trump in a differently worded question. But some people will. It’s called bias. Apparently you’re too stupid to understand that bias can be used to try to steer some people a certain way in survey question.You seem triggered your lil word game wasn’t able to sway my thinking. Must suck to be as stupid as you are.
So…yes.My answer is not a yes or no. It is what I said it is. Don't like it? Try growing up.
I answered it immediately the first time you asked it:
There were many irregularities in the 2020 election that make criticism perfectly valid.
Sorry, are you only able to comprehend single-syllable words? BTW, "single-syllable" means "rilly short."
Your feeble mind is obviously easily swayed. Us thinking people don‘t have that problem.I wouldn’t expect you to sway you’re thinking about Trump in a differently worded question. But some people will. It’s called bias. Apparently you’re too stupid to understand that bias can be used to try to steer some people a certain way in survey question.
Educate yourself, simp. It’s not that difficult.
So you admit that I answered the question. Good.So…yes.
Yes, you believe the election was rigged.
Like I said from the beginning.