Majority of Americans favor wealth tax on very rich: Reuters/Ipsos poll

No, you made a comment that "taxes were higher at one point, and it didn't end America"..... So, if you're for soaking the wealthy, for the horrible crime of being successful, how much of their money should you be allowed to rob?

Yes, I did make that comment because it is true. It was not a commentary on the idea of higher taxes on the rich, it was a factual comment. Taxes on the rich were once far higher and it did not end America, in fact many would say it was on of our best stretches.

I want everyone to pay more taxes, you mean and the really really rich and the really really poor. Unlike you I am not good with freeloading and I think it is morally wrong to run deficits in a booming economy. Neither of the two major parties nor their voters favor spending cuts, thus we need to man up and start paying our way and quit leaving it for our kids and grandkids.

Why do you enjoy being a freeloader?


Oh, I am no "freeloader" there buddy....But, let's think about this....If you think for a minute of all the taxation in your life that you pay, I'd be surprised if you actually keep 50% of your money at the middle income levels....That's Fed, State, Local, Property, Sales, Gas, Licencing, and assorted fees....So, just how much more of my money do you want?
 
It is truly sad that so many Americans are so dumb as to believe that the solution to the problems of BIG GOVERNMENT is


MORE GOVERNMENT


That is the exact definition of INSANITY
 
Oh, I am no "freeloader" there buddy....But, let's think about this....If you think for a minute of all the taxation in your life that you pay, I'd be surprised if you actually keep 50% of your money at the middle income levels....That's Fed, State, Local, Property, Sales, Gas, Licencing, and assorted fees....So, just how much more of my money do you want?

Yes, you are a freeloader because you are ok with deficit spending.

I do not want your money, I want our kids and grandkids to have theirs and for us to quit spending it.

We need to pay for what we spend, that is the bottom line...but sadly you are ok with fucking over the next generations.
 
Everyone always talks about the US debt owed to other countries without mentioning that these other countries also OWE US money. Lol. It's kind of like all the countries owe each other money.
 
No, you made a comment that "taxes were higher at one point, and it didn't end America"..... So, if you're for soaking the wealthy, for the horrible crime of being successful, how much of their money should you be allowed to rob?

Yes, I did make that comment because it is true. It was not a commentary on the idea of higher taxes on the rich, it was a factual comment. Taxes on the rich were once far higher and it did not end America, in fact many would say it was on of our best stretches.

I want everyone to pay more taxes, you mean and the really really rich and the really really poor. Unlike you I am not good with freeloading and I think it is morally wrong to run deficits in a booming economy. Neither of the two major parties nor their voters favor spending cuts, thus we need to man up and start paying our way and quit leaving it for our kids and grandkids.

Why do you enjoy being a freeloader?

I’m guessing you’re convinced that increased revenue at the treasury doesn’t equate to increased spending by the Feds?
 
Yes, you are a freeloader because you are ok with deficit spending.

I do not want your money, I want our kids and grandkids to have theirs and for us to quit spending it.

We need to pay for what we spend, that is the bottom line...but sadly you are ok with fucking over the next generations.



It really is true that about 1 in 50 politically active Americans cares about the Debt and Deficit. Most post 1998 "Republicans" are too dumb to understand basic math. Most Democrats won't care until their government check bounces....
 
National Debt No Big Deal? More Economists Unconcerned With Trillion-Dollar Government Deficits

he Congressional Budget Office estimates that the federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2019, which ended September 30, was $984 billion. That is about 4.7 percent of the American gross domestic product, and fiscal year 2019 marks the fourth year in a row that the federal deficit increased as a percentage of GDP. Through 2029, if current spending trends continue, the CBO projects that the total national debt will reach $29.3 trillion, or 95 percent of GDP.

That sounds scary to a lot of laypeople. But more and more economists look at those projections, and shrug.

High national debt levels have long been thought to cause interest rates to rise. Investors are supposed to demand higher returns for taking on additional risk, and national debt levels that are too high could stifle growth or trigger inflation. Yet, investors have remained eager to lend to the United States, without seeming to care how much it borrows. It’s been a safe bet. So far, we do not seem to be close to the “too high” threshold.

One thing that is clear: the modern national debt does not function just like a household debt, which is how it was sold as a campaign issue by the deficit hawks who pretended to care about deficit spending before Trump was elected. More national debt is not “bad” under any and all conditions, and less is not “good” under any and all conditions. It really depends on what you’re doing with the money. Try as I might to make it happen though, I don’t think “it’s more complicated than that” will ever really catch on as a successful campaign rally chant.
 
Oh, I am no "freeloader" there buddy....But, let's think about this....If you think for a minute of all the taxation in your life that you pay, I'd be surprised if you actually keep 50% of your money at the middle income levels....That's Fed, State, Local, Property, Sales, Gas, Licencing, and assorted fees....So, just how much more of my money do you want?

Yes, you are a freeloader because you are ok with deficit spending.

Really, please quote where I said that, or quit lying for a quippy rhetorical slap....It's stupid.

I do not want your money, I want our kids and grandkids to have theirs and for us to quit spending it.

That's a cop out....I've asked you several times now what you would raise taxes to, and you try each time to divert, or change the goal post, like here to spending....So, let's try and give a cogent answer instead of bumper sticker plattitudes shall we?

What spending would you cut?

We need to pay for what we spend, that is the bottom line...

I agree, so what would you cut?

but sadly you are ok with fucking over the next generations.

There you go, lying about me personally again....Where did I say I was ok with "fucking over the next generation"? You need to quit that or fuck off.
 
Pocahontas' "wealth tax" won't produce anywhere near the revenues projected.

The problems with this tax are many

The biggest one is that it would be incredibly expensive to assess this tax and collect. A huge army of tax assessors would be needed to be employed to find and attach a taxable value to every piece of of property in America as well as in the world owned by Americans. Hiring and training such a staff would be an tremendous task of biblical proportions. The amount of litigation as taxpayers contest and fight in court what the real value of their property is would mean a lot of jobs for expensive lawyers.

What is the value of the Trump Tower, example given? It would be quite a discussion.
 
National Debt No Big Deal? More Economists Unconcerned With Trillion-Dollar Government Deficits

he Congressional Budget Office estimates that the federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2019, which ended September 30, was $984 billion. That is about 4.7 percent of the American gross domestic product, and fiscal year 2019 marks the fourth year in a row that the federal deficit increased as a percentage of GDP. Through 2029, if current spending trends continue, the CBO projects that the total national debt will reach $29.3 trillion, or 95 percent of GDP.

That sounds scary to a lot of laypeople. But more and more economists look at those projections, and shrug.

High national debt levels have long been thought to cause interest rates to rise. Investors are supposed to demand higher returns for taking on additional risk, and national debt levels that are too high could stifle growth or trigger inflation. Yet, investors have remained eager to lend to the United States, without seeming to care how much it borrows. It’s been a safe bet. So far, we do not seem to be close to the “too high” threshold.

One thing that is clear: the modern national debt does not function just like a household debt, which is how it was sold as a campaign issue by the deficit hawks who pretended to care about deficit spending before Trump was elected. More national debt is not “bad” under any and all conditions, and less is not “good” under any and all conditions. It really depends on what you’re doing with the money. Try as I might to make it happen though, I don’t think “it’s more complicated than that” will ever really catch on as a successful campaign rally chant.

I’ve said this a thousand times before...those here whom love to pretend to care about the debt and deficit spending refuse to wrap their heads around the fact that this nation has obviously reached the point where it will always carry a debt-load relative to GDP.
Trust me when I tell you...none of the self proclaimed fiscally responsible here can tell you how their quality of lives are impacted by debt and spending nor can they tell you how their children and grandchildren will be affected by it....All they know is they are supposed to be outraged by it if the Orange Man is writing the checks...that’s all.
Ain’t that right Golfing Gator ?
 
so what would you cut?


I'll volunteer.....

Department of Education - cut 90% of the workforce, and block grant aid to states solely for SCHOOL CHOICE VOUCHERS.
We have 16 or so different INTEL agencies who do nothing but lie to us. Cut it back to 1, and audit all at the barrel of a gun
We can cut the living daylights out of foreign aid, because Hunter Biden and Paul Pelosi do not need any more kickbacks
Cut all Federally funded climate "studies." At barrel of a gun, put the ACTUAL DATA COLLECTED on line and let others decide. No more taxpayer funded fudge.
Cut every single "diversity counselor" employed anywhere
Cut Planned Parenthood - because it should be privately funded, and I'm one who would donate if it was cut off
Cut Homeland Security in half. Stop all snooping on private American citizens
Pull all of our troops out of the Middle East, except for Saudi, because we should take out the Saudi Royal family and get our 911 money back from taxing their oil for a while
Legalize weed and tax it, and let everyone out of Federal prison for non-violent weed offense

and then there is health care.... where we should essentially "start over" and cut out everything except Medicare for now. Re-open the free market, stiff government and private insurers, and let those who live unhealthy lifestyles pay for their care....

Essentially, I'd be happy with cutting the Federal government back to the size it was in 1996, when we had a budget surplus....
 
But more and more economists look at those projections, and shrug



As long as you can parrot it, then it doesn't matter. Just ask the people of GREECE.....

Their economy was struggling for a LONG time. There is no comparing their economic situations with ours.

Greece Before the Euro
Before acceptance into the Eurozone in 2001, Greece’s economy was plagued by several issues. During the 1980s the Greek government pursued expansionary fiscal and monetary policies. But, rather than strengthening the economy, the country suffered soaring inflation rates, high fiscal and trade deficits, low growth rates, and several exchange rate crises.


In this dismal economic environment, joining the European Monetary Union (EMU) appeared to offer a glimmer of hope. The belief was that the monetary union backed by the European Central Bank (ECB) would dampen inflation, helping to lower nominal interest rates, thereby encouraging private investment and spurring economic growth. Further, the single currency would eliminate many transaction costs, leaving more money for the deficit and debt reduction.


However, acceptance into the Eurozone was conditional, and of all the European Union (EU) member countries, Greece needed the most structural adjustment to comply with the 1992 Maastricht Treaty guidelines. The treaty limits government deficits to 3% of GDP and public debt to 60% of GDP. For the rest of the 1990s, Greece attempted to get its fiscal house in order to meet these criteria.

While Greece was accepted to the EMU in 2001, it did so under false pretenses, as its deficit and debt were nowhere near being within the Maastricht limits. In 2004, the Greek government openly admitted that its budget figures had been doctored in order to join the Eurozone. Greece’s hopes were that, despite premature entrance, membership to the EMU would help boost the economy, allowing the country to deal with its fiscal problems once they were "in." (See also, When Global Economies Converge.)

Understanding the Downfall of Greece's Economy
 
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The idea of imposing a wealth tax on the richest Americans has elicited sharply divergent views across a spectrum of politicians, with President Donald Trump branding it socialist and progressive Democratic presidential contenders Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders prominently endorsing it.

snip

Among the 4,441 respondents to the poll, 64% strongly or somewhat agreed that “the very rich should contribute an extra share of their total wealth each year to support public programs” - the essence of a wealth tax. Results were similar across gender, race and household income. While support among Democrats was stronger, at 77%, a majority of Republicans, 53%, also agreed with the idea.

Majority of Americans favor wealth tax on very rich: Reuters/Ipsos poll

If this is true, then the experiment called the United States of America as we know it is done....
BY “Americans” what they mean is dirt poor refugees and illegal aliens combined with guilt ridden liberals
 
Thiefs want to rob those who have money.
What those thief's fail to factor in is when they degrade areas the population who can afford to flee. Who can afford to flee?

The rich....


Class dismissed
 
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The idea of imposing a wealth tax on the richest Americans has elicited sharply divergent views across a spectrum of politicians, with President Donald Trump branding it socialist and progressive Democratic presidential contenders Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders prominently endorsing it.

snip

Among the 4,441 respondents to the poll, 64% strongly or somewhat agreed that “the very rich should contribute an extra share of their total wealth each year to support public programs” - the essence of a wealth tax. Results were similar across gender, race and household income. While support among Democrats was stronger, at 77%, a majority of Republicans, 53%, also agreed with the idea.

Majority of Americans favor wealth tax on very rich: Reuters/Ipsos poll

If this is true, then the experiment called the United States of America as we know it is done....
BY “Americans” what they mean is dirt poor refugees and illegal aliens combined with guilt ridden liberals

BINGO
“A poll taken in two disgusting super shitholes full of disgusting subhuman foreign filth, white guilt whackos and weirdos...Mexifornia and Loon York finds that people want more free shit paid for by America’s most productive citizens.”
What a fucking surprise huh?
 
Their economy was struggling for a LONG time. There is no comparing their economic situations with ours


Um, yes there is....

In the mid 1990s, we had the situation totally under control, with under 6 tril in debt and a budget surplus. We are now 23 tril in debt and climbing, and idiots of both parties don't care, don't complain, and don't notice. Many of the post 1998 "Republicans" are "Karl Rove voters," and those have IQs in the single digits. As long as preacher says so, so do they....

The ratios of debt to GDP, the percentage of those on the dole.... we are getting closer and closer to where Greece was when they went under.

It is absolutely ridiculous to claim the debt and deficit don't matter. What it shows is either absolute idiocy or total disregard for country USA...
 
National Debt No Big Deal? More Economists Unconcerned With Trillion-Dollar Government Deficits

he Congressional Budget Office estimates that the federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2019, which ended September 30, was $984 billion. That is about 4.7 percent of the American gross domestic product, and fiscal year 2019 marks the fourth year in a row that the federal deficit increased as a percentage of GDP. Through 2029, if current spending trends continue, the CBO projects that the total national debt will reach $29.3 trillion, or 95 percent of GDP.

That sounds scary to a lot of laypeople. But more and more economists look at those projections, and shrug.

High national debt levels have long been thought to cause interest rates to rise. Investors are supposed to demand higher returns for taking on additional risk, and national debt levels that are too high could stifle growth or trigger inflation. Yet, investors have remained eager to lend to the United States, without seeming to care how much it borrows. It’s been a safe bet. So far, we do not seem to be close to the “too high” threshold.

One thing that is clear: the modern national debt does not function just like a household debt, which is how it was sold as a campaign issue by the deficit hawks who pretended to care about deficit spending before Trump was elected. More national debt is not “bad” under any and all conditions, and less is not “good” under any and all conditions. It really depends on what you’re doing with the money. Try as I might to make it happen though, I don’t think “it’s more complicated than that” will ever really catch on as a successful campaign rally chant.

I’ve said this a thousand times before...those here whom love to pretend to care about the debt and deficit spending refuse to wrap their heads around the fact that this nation has obviously reached the point where it will always carry a debt-load relative to GDP.
Trust me when I tell you...none of the self proclaimed fiscally responsible here can tell you how their quality of lives are impacted by debt and spending nor can they tell you how their children and grandchildren will be affected by it....All they know is they are supposed to be outraged by it if the Orange Man is writing the checks...that’s all.
Ain’t that right Golfing Gator ?

That is what I was asking myself. WHO exactly are my children/grandchildren going to owe money too? It seems our country isn't the only country that owes money to other countries, and the countries we owe money to owe money too!
 
Their economy was struggling for a LONG time. There is no comparing their economic situations with ours


Um, yes there is....

In the mid 1990s, we had the situation totally under control, with under 6 tril in debt and a budget surplus. We are now 23 tril in debt and climbing, and idiots of both parties don't care, don't complain, and don't notice. Many of the post 1998 "Republicans" are "Karl Rove voters," and those have IQs in the single digits. As long as preacher says so, so do they....

The ratios of debt to GDP, the percentage of those on the dole.... we are getting closer and closer to where Greece was when they went under.

It is absolutely ridiculous to claim the debt and deficit don't matter. What it shows is either absolute idiocy or total disregard for country USA...

No it isn't, as noted in my link. Greece has had a ton of issues for a very long time, and none of that is comparable to our own issues here.
 

Forum List

Back
Top