MAGA attitude

[Crepitus]

Ah yes.

The old "Two Wrongs Make a Right!" defense.

Nope.

Nice try though, it's almost like you kids share a brain.

 

[jacksonlamb]

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Explained in one tweet.

View attachment 1248129

Need I say more?

Seriously, look at what this person is concerned about and what they aren't.

The dishonest right – still lying about abortion being ‘murder.’

 

[Correll]

Why are you in favor of mandating that birth...but totally against feeding, housing and clothing these people?

Anyway:
Way to absolutely not answer the post at all.
Surrender noted~

Your word games don't change the reality of the situation.

The action you wish to see taken, ie the abortion, is an ending of an innocent life.

Those that don't want to see that life ended, are not forcing anything. THey are protecting an innocent life.


That this might be a problem for the rape victim, is sad, but that is an aspect of the crime of the RAPE, that the RAPIST should pay for.

 

[Mac-7]

EvilEyeFleegle

You accused me of avoiding or not answering your question

Which was:
and I said, "Define innocent". 1 hour before born innocent...1 hour after not so much?
1 year old starving in her crib..innocent..or not?
Thats a lib red herring

Because in America babies or children are not allowed to starve

 

[Seymour Flops]

Why are you in favor of mandating that birth...but totally against feeding, housing and clothing these people?

Anyway:
Way to absolutely not answer the post at all.
Surrender noted~

Couples who wish to adopt babies are put on long waiting lists, and often resort to finding a child in a third world country, so that argument has zero merit.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Couples who wish to adopt babies are put on long waiting lists, and often resort to finding a child in a third world country, so that argument has zero merit.

the question was why do you mandate every fetus be born but won't guarantee housing, medical care, and food

 

[Seymour Flops]

the question was why do you mandate every fetus be born but won't guarantee housing, medical care, and food

That is guaranteed by the large number of Americans waiting to adopt babies.

I assume you apply the same logic to infanticide if a woman feels she has not the financial means to take care of a baby she just gave birth to?

If not, why not?

 

[jacksonlamb]

That is guaranteed by the large number of Americans waiting to adopt babies.

I assume you apply the same logic to infanticide if a woman feels she has not the financial means to take care of a baby she just gave birth to?

If not, why not?

The above is founded in a hope and wish not manifested by fact or action

You don't get the fallacy of false equivalency. Your example is ludicrous.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The above is founded in a hope and wish not manifested by fact or action

Well, yes. The action will happen when women stop aborting babies and start putting them up for adoption.

You don't get the fallacy of false equivalency. Your example is ludicrous.

Explain it, then.

Or just run away covering your ears and lisping "you don't underthand," which is much more typical.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Well, yes. The action will happen when women stop aborting babies and start putting them up for adoption.

Explain it, then.

Or just run away covering your ears and lisping "you don't underthand," which is much more typical.

You explain why the comparison is logical first.

Hint: you can't.

Your claim, your burden.

 

[jacksonlamb]

seymour flops cannot explain why the comparison is logical first.

Hint: he does not know what a fallacy of false equivalency.

His claim, his burden.

 

[Seymour Flops]

You explain why the comparison is logical first.

Hint: you can't.

Your claim, your burden.

It should be obvious, even to you.

If we are obliged to provide housing, medical care, and food to any unborn baby not killed by his mother becuase it was against the law, we would also be obliged to provide housing, medical care and food to any day-old unwanted baby not killed by his mother because it was against the law.

 

[jacksonlamb]

It should be obvious, even to you.

If we are obliged to provide housing, medical care, and food to any unborn baby not killed by his mother becuase it was against the law, we would also be obliged to provide housing, medical care and food to any day-old unwanted baby not killed by his mother because it was against the law.

Not logical. But we should be obliged to living children, anyway.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Not logical. But we should be obliged to living children, anyway.

Do you believe that a child with a heartbeat, brainwaves, seperate DNA, that feels pain is not living?

 

[jacksonlamb]

Do you believe that a child with a heartbeat, brainwaves, seperate DNA, that feels pain is not living?

That is a born child, sure. And why are you worried about abortion near birth: that only happens and it is very rare if the mother is endangered.

You are creating issues that don't exist.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Explained in one tweet.

View attachment 1248129

Need I say more?

Seriously, look at what this person is concerned about and what they aren't.

Code 4 u got nothing but cannot control your tds

 

[Seymour Flops]

That is a born child, sure. And why are you worried about abortion near birth: that only happens and it is very rare if the mother is endangered.

You are creating issues that don't exist.

The brainwaves, heartbeat, and ability to feel pain are in in place at 25 Weeks. Plenty of convenience abortions happen then.

Anyway, I'll let you have the last word on the abortion debate, because it is pointless.

The cannard about "who will feed the hungry brat?" if it is allowed to live is particularly nonsensical, so I pointed that out.

 

[jacksonlamb]

The brainwaves, heartbeat, and ability to feel pain are in in place at 25 Weeks. Plenty of convenience abortions happen then.

Anyway, I'll let you have the last word on the abortion debate, because it is pointless.

The cannard about "who will feed the hungry brat?" if it is allowed to live is particularly nonsensical, so I pointed that out.

Know your facts.

Abortions at 25 weeks are extremely rare — only about 1.1% of abortions in the U.S. occur at 21 weeks or later, and 25‑week abortions fall within this already tiny category.

Here this will help.

Gestational Age	% of U.S. Abortions	Notes
≤13 weeks	92.8%	Vast majority occur early.
14–20 weeks	6.1%	Declines sharply after first trimester.
≥21 weeks	1.1%	Includes 25‑week abortions; almost always medical.

usafacts.org/articles

 

[Seymour Flops]

Know your facts.

Abortions at 25 weeks are extremely rare — only about 1.1% of abortions in the U.S. occur at 21 weeks or later, and 25‑week abortions fall within this already tiny category.

Here this will help.

Gestational Age	% of U.S. Abortions	Notes
≤13 weeks	92.8%	Vast majority occur early.
14–20 weeks	6.1%	Declines sharply after first trimester.
≥21 weeks	1.1%	Includes 25‑week abortions; almost always medical.

usafacts.org/articles

Since they are so rare, let's end them completely and let those children continue to live.

Since they will be so few, they won't eat enough to bankrupt us as you seem so concerned about.