MAGA attitude

[Mac-7]

So your solution is to make a little girl bear her rapist's child?

Yes

The unborn child she is carrying has a right to life

 

[jacksonlamb]

The only abortions that should be allowed is for the life or PHYSICAL health of the mother

Not your business.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

I'm sure you've got a list of a lot of imaginary wrongs, moonbat.

Nope dingus...I find more right about America than wrong...although the wrongs are there.
Imaginary? I think not..as uninformed jerks like you are on the list..I'm fairly reality based.
The MAGA are just the latest iteration of idiots that started with the Know-Nothings, morphed in the Birchers..transformed into Goldwater clones...became Tea Party cosplayers--were consumed with rage and fear when Obama was elected--and are now MAGA. Nothing imaginary about you folk, you've been around forever!

The Moonbat thing amuses--I remember when the term was coined..for Jerry Brown in Cali--during his first term.

 

[Mac-7]

Not your business.

Wrong

The protection of innocent human life is societies business

 

[jacksonlamb]

Yes

The unborn child she is carrying has a right to life

Not your business.

 

[1srelluc]

Meh, that's the part where the UTILITY of abortion comes into play....That and getting shed of future dems.

 

[Muhammed]

Nope dingus...I find more right about America than wrong...although the wrongs are there.
Imaginary? I think not..as uninformed jerks like you are on the list..I'm fairly reality based.
The MAGA are just the latest iteration of idiots that started with the Know-Nothings, morphed in the Birchers..transformed into Goldwater clones...became Tea Party cosplayers--were consumed with rage and fear when Obama was elected--and are now MAGA. Nothing imaginary about you folk, you've been around forever!

The Moonbat thing amuses--I remember when the term was coined..for Jerry Brown in Cali--during his first term.

100% imaginary wrongs.

You pooooor victim!

 

[Mac-7]

Not your business.

Now you are repeating yourself

 

[Seymour Flops]

Explained in one tweet.

View attachment 1248129

Need I say more?

Seriously, look at what this person is concerned about and what they aren't.

Ah yes.

The old "Two Wrongs Make a Right!" defense.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Wrong

The protection of innocent human life is societies business

I see..does innocent stop at birth?
What constitutes protection? From hunger? From exposure to elements? From ignorance?
Protection? For the innocents~

...or is the job just to keep pumping those kids out...more victims for life to prey upon?

I'm not sure if you know what you are saying....since I would totally agree that the protection of innocent human life is societies concern.
Yet I feel that we are talking about completely different things..since Socialism is quite big on 'protecting the innocents' from the depredations of those..errr...less innocent~

 

[jacksonlamb]

Now you are repeating yourself

Correction your repetitious nonsense.

 

[Mac-7]

I see..does innocent stop at birth?
What constitutes protection? From hunger? From exposure to elements? From ignorance?
Protection? For the innocents~

...or is the job just to keep pumping those kids out...more victims for life to prey upon?

I'm not sure if you know what you are saying....since I would totally agree that the protection of innocent human life is societies concern.
Yet I feel that we are talking about completely different things..since Socialism is quite big on 'protecting the innocents' from the depredations of those..errr...less innocent~

I said protection of innocent human life

Dont try to morph that into free everything for everyone

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

I said protection of innocent human life

Dont try to morph that into free everything for everyone

...and I said, "Define innocent". 1 hour before born innocent...1 hour after not so much?
1 year old starving in her crib..innocent..or not?

I think the only thing you want society to protect...is your world-view and your cultural/religious beliefs...further..that you desire that they be mandated for all.

Your argument is broken. If you only care about the unborn..and drop the ball caring about the living--you become a hypocrite, IMO.

Babies are dying everyday..poor nutrition..bad water---neglect. that's here in the US.

I sense some kind of God-madness in this...that once the soul is born...it is no longer societies responsibility--even though, in your world--you have society compel the birth~

 

[j-mac]

Explained in one tweet.

View attachment 1248129

Need I say more?

Seriously, look at what this person is concerned about and what they aren't.

Anecdotal. And a lie....So many fallacies.....Gheeze.

 

[Cassandro]

Explained in one tweet.

View attachment 1248129

Need I say more?

Seriously, look at what this person is concerned about and what they aren't.

You have just failed your IQ test:

1. You failed to grasp that the essential point of the first text was that a young girl could get an abortion without her parents' knowledge.

2. The second text ignored this point and tried to insert (incestuous) rape as a substitute topic.

3. You then concluded that the first text indicated a lack of concern about rape. This demonstrates that you are unable to understand the concepts of chronological sequence and deductive reasoning.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

You have just failed your IQ test:

1. You failed to grasp that the essential point of the first text was that a young girl could get an abortion without her parents' knowledge.

2. The second text ignored this point and tried to insert (incestuous) rape as a substitute topic.

3. You then concluded that the first text indicated a lack of concern about rape. This demonstrates that you are unable to understand the concepts of chronological sequence and deductive reasoning.

Just...no--although an amusing attempt.

You're saying that..in ignoring the propaganda point that YOU wanted noted..OP chose to make his own propaganda point.

Chronological sequence??

Meretricious rhetoric leads to deliberate obfuscation of the point of the OP.

BTW..that the young victim could get an abortion without parental consent and thus take charge of her future is a GOOD thing...so you can bet that no-one 'missed the point'.

 

[Mac-7]

...and I said, "Define innocent". 1 hour before born innocent...1 hour after not so much?
1 year old starving in her crib..innocent..or not?

I think the only thing you want society to protect...is your world-view and your cultural/religious beliefs...further..that you desire that they be mandated for all.

Your argument is broken. If you only care about the unborn..and drop the ball caring about the living--you become a hypocrite, IMO.

Babies are dying everyday..poor nutrition..bad water---neglect. that's here in the US.

I sense some kind of God-madness in this...that once the soul is born...it is no longer societies responsibility--even though, in your world--you have society compel the birth~

In America criminals must be convicted of a capital offense before being put to death

What heinous act is a helpless child guilty of one hour before or after birth?

The answer is none

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

In America criminals must be convicted of a capital offense before being put to death

What heinous act is a helpless child guilty of one hour before or after birth?

The answer is none

Why are you in favor of mandating that birth...but totally against feeding, housing and clothing these people?

Anyway:
Way to absolutely not answer the post at all.
Surrender noted~

 

[Mac-7]

Why are you in favor of mandating that birth...but totally against feeding, housing and clothing these people?

Anyway:
Way to absolutely not answer the post at all.
Surrender noted~

Dont answer my question with another question

Just concede the point if you cant refute it

 

[jacksonlamb]

You have just failed your IQ test:

1. You failed to grasp that the essential point of the first text was that a young girl could get an abortion without her parents' knowledge.

2. The second text ignored this point and tried to insert (incestuous) rape as a substitute topic.

3. You then concluded that the first text indicated a lack of concern about rape. This demonstrates that you are unable to understand the concepts of chronological sequence and deductive reasoning.

It's none of your business is the point. It is the family, and, if necessary, events for the police. Not you.