Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #101
LOLBilly is a troll. If he was serious, he would give us a blueprint or drawing or a photograph of his experiment and preliminary data. He seems to be playing the people in this thread that think he is nuts. He just want's attention to waste our time.I haven't the faintest fuck of an idea what you're talking about with "react to LWIR". There are three things it could do: reflect, absorb or transmit and will usually do some combination of the three. There is no "no reaction" option. Your material is completely opaque to visible light making it extremely unlikely that it is transparent to LW.
Every material used on the shuttle emitted (and thus absorbed) LWIR. There is absolutely no reason an ablative or non-ablative heat shield material should be designed to not absorb LWIR and several significant reasons indicating it should. Where have you gotten the idea that a heat shield wouldn't "react" with LWIR?
Instead of playing these stupid games, why don't you tell us precisely what your tube was made of. If you don't know, man up and tell us so.
The technical paper will be out soon enough... Until then I will only talk about it in generalities... Heat shields are made to be inactive to LWIR and able to release energy from friction.. You folks are idiots and all you see is your beloved AGW lie... You ignore the real science being done to tout your power grab...