Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
Nope…never have. Besides, changing an electric car is about the same as running a room air conditioner…
no big deal.
Since there is zero evidence that Earth is "warming," time to blame Exxon...
- Thread starter EMH
- Start date
no big deal.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
All made up shit……from the most ignorant of all.Got to hand it to the Co2 FRAUD. Busted over and over for having zero unfudged evidence to back itself up, the Co2 FRAUD will now... blame Exxon...
And this is typical.
Does increasing atmospheric Co2 warm the atmosphere?
Not according to the two and only two (unfudged) measures we have of atmospheric temps - satellite and balloons
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.www.nbcnews.com
satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.
Co2 FRAUD "solution" = fudge both with uncorrelated bull#### excuses which do not stand up to scrutiny
Can the Co2 FRAUD show us a PHOTO of ocean "rise?" = NO
WHY?
Because OCEANS ARE NOT RISING because THERE IS NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT because PLANET EARTH IS NOT WARMING
What does it say about humans who fall for the Co2 FRAUD?
A: IQ under 5
abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,956
- 2,768
- 315
Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
By Neela Banerjee, Lisa Song and David HasemyerMay 2, 2024
Editor’s note: This article, originally published on September 16, 2015, was the first installment of a nine-part investigation called Exxon: The Road Not Taken, now more commonly known as #ExxonKnew, that was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 2016. The article, and the series, was again in the news this week, referenced as part of a Congressional report on the oil industry’s denial, disinformation and doublespeak on climate change. It was released jointly yesterday by the Senate Committee on the Budget and the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
At a meeting in Exxon Corporation’s headquarters, a senior company scientist named James F. Black addressed an audience of powerful oilmen. Speaking without a text as he flipped through detailed slides, Black delivered a sobering message: carbon dioxide from the world’s use of fossil fuels would warm the planet and could eventually endanger humanity.
“In the first place, there is general scientific agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels,” Black told Exxon’s Management Committee, according to a written version he recorded later.
It was July 1977 when Exxon’s leaders received this blunt assessment, well before most of the world had heard of the looming climate crisis.
A year later, Black, a top technical expert in Exxon’s Research & Engineering division, took an updated version of his presentation to a broader audience. He warned Exxon scientists and managers that independent researchers estimated a doubling of the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere would increase average global temperatures by 2 to 3 degrees Celsius (4 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit), and as much as 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) at the poles. Rainfall might get heavier in some regions, and other places might turn to desert.
Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago - Inside Climate News
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
insideclimatenews.org
`
Last edited:
Does Exxon control the heat stored in ocean?Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
By Neela Banerjee, Lisa Song and David Hasemyer
May 2, 2024
Editor’s note: This article, originally published on September 16, 2015, was the first installment of a nine-part investigation called Exxon: The Road Not Taken, now more commonly known as #ExxonKnew, that was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 2016. The article, and the series, was again in the news this week, referenced as part of a Congressional report on the oil industry’s denial, disinformation and doublespeak on climate change. It was released jointly yesterday by the Senate Committee on the Budget and the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
At a meeting in Exxon Corporation’s headquarters, a senior company scientist named James F. Black addressed an audience of powerful oilmen. Speaking without a text as he flipped through detailed slides, Black delivered a sobering message: carbon dioxide from the world’s use of fossil fuels would warm the planet and could eventually endanger humanity.
“In the first place, there is general scientific agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels,” Black told Exxon’s Management Committee, according to a written version he recorded later.
It was July 1977 when Exxon’s leaders received this blunt assessment, well before most of the world had heard of the looming climate crisis.
A year later, Black, a top technical expert in Exxon’s Research & Engineering division, took an updated version of his presentation to a broader audience. He warned Exxon scientists and managers that independent researchers estimated a doubling of the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere would increase average global temperatures by 2 to 3 degrees Celsius (4 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit), and as much as 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) at the poles. Rainfall might get heavier in some regions, and other places might turn to desert.
Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago - Inside Climate News
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
`
abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,956
- 2,768
- 315
Exxon scientists predicted global warming with 'shocking skill ...
Harvard Gazettehttps://news.harvard.edu › gazette › story › 2023/01
Jan 12, 2023 — Research shows that company modeled and predicted global warming with 'shocking skill and accuracy' starting in the 1970s. Projections created ...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com › article › exxon-k...
Oct 26, 2015 — A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote ...
Exxon Scientists Predicted Global Warming, Even as ...
The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com › 2023/01/12 › climate › exx...
Jan 12, 2023 — Global warming projections made or recorded by ExxonMobil scientists between 1977 and 2003 closely tracked with observed temperature increases.
Exxon's Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels' Role in ...
Inside Climate Newshttps://insideclimatenews.org › News
May 2, 2024 — David, the head of Exxon Research, told a global warming conference financed by Exxon in October 1982 that “few people doubt that the world ...
Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections
Science | AAAS
https://www.science.org › doi › science.abk0063
by G Supran · 2023 · Cited by 152 — Accurate and skillful climate modeling. Overall, ExxonMobil's global warming projections closely track subsequent observed temperature increases ...
Exxon climate predictions were accurate decades ago. Still ...
NPRhttps://www.npr.org › 2023/01/12 › exxon-climate-pre...
Jan 12, 2023 — Exxon's climate research decades back painted an accurate picture of global warming, according to a new scientific paper.
Revealed: Exxon made 'breathtakingly' accurate climate ...
The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com › business › jan › exxon-...
Jan 12, 2023 — The oil giant Exxon privately “predicted global warming correctly and skilfully” only to then spend decades publicly rubbishing such science ...
Exxon's Own Models Predicted Global Warming
Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com › article › exxons-o...
Jan 13, 2023 — Exxon's Own Models Predicted Global Warming—It Ignored Them. Scientists working for the oil giant Exxon in the 1970s and 1980s estimated ...
Exxon predicted global warming with remarkable accuracy
CNBC
https://www.cnbc.com › 2023/01/12 › exxon-predicted...
Jan 12, 2023 — "We now have airtight, unimpeachable evidence that ExxonMobil accurately predicted global warming years before it turned around and publicly ...
Exxon scientists knew almost exactly how bad climate ...
Fortunehttps://fortune.com › 2023/01/12 › exxon-scientists-clim...
Jan 12, 2023 — It “gives us airtight evidence that Exxon Mobil accurately predicted global warming years before, then turned around and attacked the science ...
`
Does Exxon control the sun? Because it's the sun that is causing the ocean to warm.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,510
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #27
Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
By Neela Banerjee, Lisa Song and David Hasemyer
May 2, 2024
Editor’s note: This article, originally published on September 16, 2015, was the first installment of a nine-part investigation called Exxon: The Road Not Taken, now more commonly known as #ExxonKnew, that was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 2016. The article, and the series, was again in the news this week, referenced as part of a Congressional report on the oil industry’s denial, disinformation and doublespeak on climate change. It was released jointly yesterday by the Senate Committee on the Budget and the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
At a meeting in Exxon Corporation’s headquarters, a senior company scientist named James F. Black addressed an audience of powerful oilmen. Speaking without a text as he flipped through detailed slides, Black delivered a sobering message: carbon dioxide from the world’s use of fossil fuels would warm the planet and could eventually endanger humanity.
“In the first place, there is general scientific agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels,” Black told Exxon’s Management Committee, according to a written version he recorded later.
It was July 1977 when Exxon’s leaders received this blunt assessment, well before most of the world had heard of the looming climate crisis.
A year later, Black, a top technical expert in Exxon’s Research & Engineering division, took an updated version of his presentation to a broader audience. He warned Exxon scientists and managers that independent researchers estimated a doubling of the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere would increase average global temperatures by 2 to 3 degrees Celsius (4 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit), and as much as 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) at the poles. Rainfall might get heavier in some regions, and other places might turn to desert.
Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago - Inside Climate News
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
`
This is what taxpayers fund for the Co2 FRAUD, fudged "Exxon documents" that are completely wrong since, as the satellites and balloons document, Co2 does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
By Neela Banerjee, Lisa Song and David Hasemyer
May 2, 2024
Editor’s note: This article, originally published on September 16, 2015, was the first installment of a nine-part investigation called Exxon: The Road Not Taken, now more commonly known as #ExxonKnew, that was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 2016. The article, and the series, was again in the news this week, referenced as part of a Congressional report on the oil industry’s denial, disinformation and doublespeak on climate change. It was released jointly yesterday by the Senate Committee on the Budget and the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
At a meeting in Exxon Corporation’s headquarters, a senior company scientist named James F. Black addressed an audience of powerful oilmen. Speaking without a text as he flipped through detailed slides, Black delivered a sobering message: carbon dioxide from the world’s use of fossil fuels would warm the planet and could eventually endanger humanity.
“In the first place, there is general scientific agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels,” Black told Exxon’s Management Committee, according to a written version he recorded later.
It was July 1977 when Exxon’s leaders received this blunt assessment, well before most of the world had heard of the looming climate crisis.
A year later, Black, a top technical expert in Exxon’s Research & Engineering division, took an updated version of his presentation to a broader audience. He warned Exxon scientists and managers that independent researchers estimated a doubling of the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere would increase average global temperatures by 2 to 3 degrees Celsius (4 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit), and as much as 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) at the poles. Rainfall might get heavier in some regions, and other places might turn to desert.
Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago - Inside Climate News
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
`
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect
Those bastards!!! They rediscovered the greenhouse effect and kept it a secret. DURR
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
You obviously don’t read much, just listen to Fix News tripe. Being science illiterate is a precursor to thinking you know wtf you’re talking about. But tell us, again, how every climate research facility in the world….lies; our military and every related corporation in the world..
What makes you so smart when you never took a science class and remained awake.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
The average sea level has risen more than a foot around the statute since 1900. Being an science illiterate means you know nothing about the tides and storm surge do you ? Tell us again why you’re smarter than MIT.All disproven by the data.
Have a photo of "ocean rise" yet????
WHERE is the "ocean rise?"
Foolish…you’re in the minority even among republicans. The only Republican majority who thinks backwards about AGW foolish, ARE OVER 65……and stupid.
- Sep 9, 2022
- 24,299
- 11,803
- 1,138
If Exxon proved it is true, they would never publish doubt. It would be like tightening the noose on your own neck.
Despite those forecasts, team leaders say, the multinational energy giant continued to sow doubt about the gathering crisis.
Exxon scientists predicted global warming with 'shocking skill and accuracy,' Harvard researchers say
In the study, scientists showed how the multinational energy giant worked to cloud the issue.
news.harvard.edu
Think that over. Money would be worth nothing on a melting planet. I do not see this being told by Exxon Mobile of the Netherlands.
- Sep 9, 2022
- 24,299
- 11,803
- 1,138
There are fortunes made off of fools like you are.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
Dufus, they published it on their website.If Exxon proved it is true, they would never publish doubt. It would be like tightening the noose on your own neck.
Despite those forecasts, team leaders say, the multinational energy giant continued to sow doubt about the gathering crisis.
Exxon scientists predicted global warming with 'shocking skill and accuracy,' Harvard researchers say
In the study, scientists showed how the multinational energy giant worked to cloud the issue.
Think that over. Money would be worth nothing on a melting planet. I do not see this being told by Exxon Mobile of the Netherlands.
- Sep 9, 2022
- 24,299
- 11,803
- 1,138
You would show it Rastus.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,510
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #39
LOL!!!
So ALL of the OLD PHOTOS of the Statue of Liberty were taken precisely at high tide, with the Moon right over the torch.... LOL!!!
Folks, THAT's ALL THEY CAN CLAIM, SINCE THE VISUAL EVIDENCE IS 100% PROOF THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE....
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
Bubba, go to their websites….If Exxon proved it is true, they would never publish doubt. It would be like tightening the noose on your own neck.
Despite those forecasts, team leaders say, the multinational energy giant continued to sow doubt about the gathering crisis.
Exxon scientists predicted global warming with 'shocking skill and accuracy,' Harvard researchers say
In the study, scientists showed how the multinational energy giant worked to cloud the issue.
Think that over. Money would be worth nothing on a melting planet. I do not see this being told by Exxon Mobile of the Netherlands.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Dems bring out heavy hitters....failure K. Harris to deliver speech
- Started by struth
- Replies: 7
-
Zone1 Well this gal certainly has a pair of big brass ones- Started by JGalt
- Replies: 8
