Louisiana wants to make abortion a crime of murder.


Should women face life in prison for the crime of having an abortion?? Yes or NO ??
Killing a completely healthy, viable baby capable of surviving outside the womb when neither the mother's or baby's life is on danger?

Yes
 
What has it been--five days? And already the Left is alienating people with this ridiculous rhetoric. I knew this would happen....you all cannot help yourselves

Better to alienate people than assassinate them.or kl them in domestic terrorist bombings.

(If the death cult can't klll babies they revert to killing adults until they get their way. "The leash is off.")
 
Dont move to Louisiana.
.

So true ... An absolutely horrible place.
Don't even visit here and try to avoid when travelling.

The food is terrible, the people are terrible, there is nothing to see or do.
If you must travel through, get gas, snacks and everything before you cross the state line and don't even slow down.
If you get a flat tire ... Just ride on the rim until you make it out of the state.

And don't think about coming back either.

.
 
.

So true ... An absolutely horrible place.
Don't even visit here and try to avoid when travelling.

The food is terrible, the people are terrible, there is nothing to see or do.
If you must travel through, get gas, snacks and everything before you cross the state line and don't even slow down.
If you get a flat tire ... Just ride on the rim until you make it out of the state.

And don't think about coming back either.

.
They eat spicy crawling fish too. You can get a mixed drink in a drive through to go with it.

Don't go to these states leftist........You will be ruined.
 
They eat spicy crawling fish too. You can get a mixed drink in a drive through to go with it.
.

Hush Damnit ... All Lies.
We wrap them up in newspaper with other garbage before feeding it all to the pigs.

1655508456806.png


The only reason the people in Louisiana want more babies
is because we make the little children do all the chores and fetch beer from the fridge.


.
 
Last edited:
yep

and your point would be?
It’s extreme, not right, will harm women who will get them Anyways.

Women have been getting abortions since women have existed. Life isn’t that precious. If you think it is start treating humans better and don’t get an abortion. Freedom and choice.

This is your religion talking. Keep that fake ass religious shit to yourself please.
 
The GOP and anti abortionists have been scheming and plotting this for decades. We thought Roe V Wade was settled but they were laying the ground work with lower court cases that they could bring to the now right wing Supreme Court and use those cases as justification to make abortion murder. That's the end game. Don't lie.

And you guys don't even like women taking the morning after pill.


Don't worry. Now it will be even easier to get an abortion. Thanks.

Heavyweight anti-choice groups like Susan B. Anthony List and Americans United For Life stated at the start of this year that restricting abortion drugs is a top priority in 2022. Already, 19 states have banned prescribing medication abortion via mail or by virtual telehealth visits.

If you don't want to go to prison for having these pills mailed to your home in Oklahoma, I guess you might have to drive to a neighboring state to buy these pills.

But now you can get an abortion from the comfort of your own home. Sounds better than what we were doing before.

LOL, you think you're not a Democrat, then you vomit Democrat talking points over and over, LOL
 
The Republican Party is so afraid of the power and influence women have achieved in our society that they are seeking to shame and criminalize your very autonomy
 
There's the crux of the issue and the reason that Rowe v Wade is getting overturned.

50 years ago, politicians unwilling to take on the contentious issue of abortion, decided they could pass that hot potato to the USSC. By getting the court to make it a Constitutional issue. It relieved politicians from having to make a decision about a divisive subject.

However, as you say, The US Constitution does not mention either male or female reproductive organs so a legal pretzel was created that made abortion on demand a matter of medical privacy. Also something not guaranteed by the The Constitution.

However, like most political chicanery, it emboldened the winners to believe they were untouchable and created a ferocity in the losers who felt (rightfully so) they had been cheated of letting the voters decide the matter.

For the last two years, either unable to make the connection or unwilling to believe they could lose, the people who have been chasing people around with needles and demanding vaccine passports, have now found that they have weakened the medical privacy foundation for the USSC decision has fallen apart and we are back to where we were in 1973.

So, those people who were so sure they could never have the landmark decision reverse have found out they were wrong and they have to decide which path to go down to get back into the fight.

They could go down the angry route ...

... violent protests and the destruction of public and private property. This won't really accomplish they changes they desire. It will make each side more militant.
... destruction of the USSC by adding dozens more judges that would make court stacking easier for BOTH parties when they are in power. However, since The Constitution sets and upper limit of 10 judges and we currently have 9. This isn't a realistic option.

They could go down the fair play route ...

... get the issue on the ballot in each state with abortion restriction laws and let the voters in each state decide. Proponents of unrestricted abortion believe the vast majority of people stand with them so this should be an attractive option for them. They believe they will win state plebiscites so there should be no problem with pushing for them.

... take the long game of pushing a Constitutional Amendment to make abortion on demand a Constitutional Right. This also puts the issue in the hands of the voters but only 3/4th of the states have to pass such an amendment for it to become binding on all the states.

I'm happy to see this decision back in the hands of the voters and legislators as was intended by our founders. Rowe v Wade was bad law. It was a cowardly way for politicians on both sides to avoid being linked to the extremists on both sides. Politicians could remain neutral and still claim whatever position played best to their bases.

Just a warning to both sides ... taking extreme positions will only chose to make this issue more volatile, making a final, LEGAL, resolution of the matter nearly impossible.

Where does the Constitution set a number of SCOTUS judges? I think you are confused
 

Forum List

Back
Top