Locke, Social Contract Theory, and the Citizens Right to Revolt

[Bush92]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

 

[Skylar]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

 

[Bush92]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Patriots want our Constitution restored. Antifa BLM want to destroy the Republic. BIG difference.

 

[Skylar]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

 

[Bush92]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

 

[Skylar]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

What war?

If you're waging war against the United States, that's treason. Its the only crime defined in the Constitution.

Is that what you're doing?

 

[9thIDdoc]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

Do you see why slavery was bad?

Do you see why racism was bad?

Why segregation was bad?

Why Jim Crow was bad?

Why black Americans continue to FIGHT for our rights and JUSTICE?

You and many other whites in this country need to LEARN to live by your PROCLAIMED values!

SNAP OUT OF IT!!!!!

You and many other whites in this country need to LEARN to live by your PROCLAIMED values!
Good advice for Americans of all races including blacks.

 

[Care4all]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

And a duly elected government has a right defend itself from sedition.

If it was legitimately elected.

It was.

When you have ballot dumps in the middle of the night with the nefarious "mail in ballots" it violates the social contract rendering the government illegitimate.

There were no ballot dumps in the middle of the night.... absentee ballots were not processed and counted until the middle of the night.... and the next few nights, it took a while to process, then count them all.

You can't have an absentee ballot without an envelope, an envelope that was processed, including whether it was a legitimate registered voter, and one that put in a request for that mail ballot... in all of the battle ground states, except one, which had election law in their state, that permitted them to mail ballots to registered voters, without a request.


In the Checks and Balance process of elections, the count of how many mail in ballots were processed by the machine, has to match the count of absentee ballot envelopes received.

You can not stuff the ballot count with absentee ballots, nor can you run a ballot through more than once, with both times it counting.....because the total of ballots, would be more than the total of envelopes, and it would be CAUGHT.

 

[Bush92]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

What war?

If you're waging war against the United States, that's treason. Its the only crime defined in the Constitution.

Is that what you're doing?

Black Lives Matter Deliberately targeted law enforcement. These were collateral damage sadly. Too bad liberals pushed it that far. Treason? Like violation of free press? Preventing people from exercising their free worship and religion over a phony virus? Prohibiting freedom of assembly over the same communist Chinese virus? This was not in no way shape or form treason...but a citizenry who has had enough! Four years of attacking our vote for Trump. Four years of promoting lies and impeachment, four years of promoting absolute lies and bullshit because Hillary getting her ass beat didn't fit your goddamn narrative.

 

[Skylar]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

What war?

If you're waging war against the United States, that's treason. Its the only crime defined in the Constitution.

Is that what you're doing?

Black Lives Matter Deliberately targeted law enforcement. These were collateral damage sadly. Too bad liberals pushed it that far. Treason? Like violation of free press? Preventing people from exercising their free worship and religion over a phony virus? Prohibiting freedom of assembly over the same communist Chinese virus? This was not in no way shape or form treason...but a citizenry who has had enough! Four years of attacking our vote for Trump. Four years of promoting lies and impeachment, four years of promoting absolute lies and bullshit because Hillary getting her ass beat didn't fit your goddamn narrative.

You said there are 'casualties in any war' when referring to the cop that the Trump insurrectionists killed.

What war are you referring to? Who is the war against?

That cop?

 

[9thIDdoc]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

What war?

If you're waging war against the United States, that's treason. Its the only crime defined in the Constitution.

Is that what you're doing?

You might want to keep in mind that those who wrote the Constitution had just committed treason against their legitimate English government and believed that treason against an oppressive government was not only a right but the duty of a Patriot.

 

[Bush92]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

And a duly elected government has a right defend itself from sedition.

If it was legitimately elected.

It was.

When you have ballot dumps in the middle of the night with the nefarious "mail in ballots" it violates the social contract rendering the government illegitimate.

There were no ballot dumps in the middle of the night.... absentee ballots were not processed and counted until the middle of the night.... and the next few nights, it took a while to process, then count them all.

You can't have an absentee ballot without an envelope, an envelope that was processed, including whether it was a legitimate registered voter, and one that put in a request for that mail ballot... in all of the battle ground states, except one, which had election law in their state, that permitted them to mail ballots to registered voters, without a request.


In the Checks and Balance process of elections, the count of how many mail in ballots were processed by the machine, has to match the count of absentee ballot envelopes received.

You can not stuff the ballot count with absentee ballots, nor can you run a ballot through more than once, with both times it counting.....because the total of ballots, would be more than the total of envelopes, and it would be CAUGHT.

No ballot dumps on the middle of the night? OMG you are a complete operative aren't you?

 

[Bush92]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

What war?

If you're waging war against the United States, that's treason. Its the only crime defined in the Constitution.

Is that what you're doing?

You might want to keep in mind that those who wrote the Constitution had just committed treason against their legitimate English government and believed that treason against an oppressive government was not only a right but the duty of a Patriot.

Medic Up! Thanks brother.

 

[Bush92]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

And a duly elected government has a right defend itself from sedition.

If it was legitimately elected.

It was.

When you have ballot dumps in the middle of the night with the nefarious "mail in ballots" it violates the social contract rendering the government illegitimate.

There were no ballot dumps in the middle of the night.... absentee ballots were not processed and counted until the middle of the night.... and the next few nights, it took a while to process, then count them all.

You can't have an absentee ballot without an envelope, an envelope that was processed, including whether it was a legitimate registered voter, and one that put in a request for that mail ballot... in all of the battle ground states, except one, which had election law in their state, that permitted them to mail ballots to registered voters, without a request.


In the Checks and Balance process of elections, the count of how many mail in ballots were processed by the machine, has to match the count of absentee ballot envelopes received.

You can not stuff the ballot count with absentee ballots, nor can you run a ballot through more than once, with both times it counting.....because the total of ballots, would be more than the total of envelopes, and it would be CAUGHT.

No ballot dumps? What a buffoon.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

Do you see why slavery was bad?

Do you see why racism was bad?

Why segregation was bad?

Why Jim Crow was bad?

Why black Americans continue to FIGHT for our rights and JUSTICE?

You and many other whites in this country need to LEARN to live by your PROCLAIMED values!

SNAP OUT OF IT!!!!!

There's 80,000,000 Patriots starting up the rotors. There's 40,000,000 graveyard voters rejoicing that we're going remove them from the voter registration list.

 

[Skylar]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

What war?

If you're waging war against the United States, that's treason. Its the only crime defined in the Constitution.

Is that what you're doing?

You might want to keep in mind that those who wrote the Constitution had just committed treason against their legitimate English government and believed that treason against an oppressive government was not only a right but the duty of a Patriot.

And then stomped on Shay with both feet when he tried the same.

Treason is the only crime defined in the constitution for a reason.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

Absolutely not. Patriots want to restore the Constitution.

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

So you're cool with BLM attacking any government building then?

Nope. They are hard core Marxist wanting to overthrow our whole way of life. Patriots love the Constitution and simply want to restore power back to the people.

Aren't they 'the people' in your argument? Wouldn't any attack they make against the government be justified per your own reasoning?

Again, no. Patriots want to change the direction of the United States back to the original Constitution. BLM and Antifa want to burn the Constitution.

So only the folks that agree with you are the 'people'.....and thus justified in killing cops, attacking the government and trying to overthrow our democracy?

So the seditionists sent by Trump killed that cop to 'restore the constitution'?

It was spontaneous and there are casualties to any war. You seemed to like dead cops during the 4 years of communist marches.

What war?

If you're waging war against the United States, that's treason. Its the only crime defined in the Constitution.

Is that what you're doing?

You might want to keep in mind that those who wrote the Constitution had just committed treason against their legitimate English government and believed that treason against an oppressive government was not only a right but the duty of a Patriot.

And then stomped on Shay with both feet when he tried the same.

Treason is the only crime defined in the constitution for a reason.

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/08/1862/1048/CNN-Headline-Fiery-2.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

 

[Skylar]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

Do you see why slavery was bad?

Do you see why racism was bad?

Why segregation was bad?

Why Jim Crow was bad?

Why black Americans continue to FIGHT for our rights and JUSTICE?

You and many other whites in this country need to LEARN to live by your PROCLAIMED values!

SNAP OUT OF IT!!!!!

There's 80,000,000 Patriots starting up the rotors. There's 40,000,000 graveyard voters rejoicing that we're going remove them from the voter registration list.

What does 'staring up at the rotors' mean?

 

[Care4all]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

And a duly elected government has a right defend itself from sedition.

If it was legitimately elected.

It was.

When you have ballot dumps in the middle of the night with the nefarious "mail in ballots" it violates the social contract rendering the government illegitimate.

There were no ballot dumps in the middle of the night.... absentee ballots were not processed and counted until the middle of the night.... and the next few nights, it took a while to process, then count them all.

You can't have an absentee ballot without an envelope, an envelope that was processed, including whether it was a legitimate registered voter, and one that put in a request for that mail ballot... in all of the battle ground states, except one, which had election law in their state, that permitted them to mail ballots to registered voters, without a request.


In the Checks and Balance process of elections, the count of how many mail in ballots were processed by the machine, has to match the count of absentee ballot envelopes received.

You can not stuff the ballot count with absentee ballots, nor can you run a ballot through more than once, with both times it counting.....because the total of ballots, would be more than the total of envelopes, and it would be CAUGHT.

No ballot dumps on the middle of the night? OMG you are a complete operative aren't you?

plenty of them, but nothing was nefarious.... it was expected, that Biden would get at least 75% of those absentee ballot votes overall..... which were not counted and transfered to the county tally, until the middle of the night....

it was predicted biden would overtake trump once the absentee votes were counted

 

[9thIDdoc]

" John Locke wrote in his Two Treaties on Government that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments."
- Stanford University Plato
What we saw at the citadel of political corruption (The Congress) was people keeping their end of the social contract and storming the center of a crime syndicate. Power ultimately rest in the hands of the people. The citizens have every right to revolt against governments that do not rule in a just manner.

And a duly elected government has a right defend itself from sedition.

If it was legitimately elected.

It was.

When you have ballot dumps in the middle of the night with the nefarious "mail in ballots" it violates the social contract rendering the government illegitimate.

There were no ballot dumps in the middle of the night.... absentee ballots were not processed and counted until the middle of the night.... and the next few nights, it took a while to process, then count them all.

You can't have an absentee ballot without an envelope, an envelope that was processed, including whether it was a legitimate registered voter, and one that put in a request for that mail ballot... in all of the battle ground states, except one, which had election law in their state, that permitted them to mail ballots to registered voters, without a request.


In the Checks and Balance process of elections, the count of how many mail in ballots were processed by the machine, has to match the count of absentee ballot envelopes received.

You can not stuff the ballot count with absentee ballots, nor can you run a ballot through more than once, with both times it counting.....because the total of ballots, would be more than the total of envelopes, and it would be CAUGHT.

And what exactly stops a machine from counting a vote for Trump as a vote for Biden if secretly rigged to do so? When I voted I pushed a series of buttons on a machine and have no way of knowing what the machine actually registered or whether that information was passed on correctly. I expect some proof that my vote was actually counted as intended before I would consider the election legitimate. Why should States have an opportunity to make laws that make it easier for them to cheat? The President elected is supposed to be the President of every one in the Nation so the rules for his election should apply equally to all citizens. But ONLY actual living breathing citizens.