List Of dimocraps Who Voted Against Restoring Veterans Benefits

[Edgetho]

Every time I think it isn't possible for dimocraps to sink any lower......

They do

Vote summary: 264-164. Failed (required 2/3 majority).

This bill would have restored funding for American veterans' benefits. The 164 Democrats listed on this page don't think veterans' benefits are important enough to pay for. Click the tweet buttons to ask them why.

Source: clerk.house.gov/ ...

Andrews
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cárdenas
Carney
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Conyers
Costa
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farr
Fattah
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Garamendi
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutiérrez
Hahn
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Higgins
Himes
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huffman
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kind
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Luján, Ben Ray (NM)
Maloney, Carolyn
Matsui
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Richmond
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth

Here's a tweet dealio if you want to express your displeasure
164 Democrats Voted Against American Veterans

Like it'll do any good.

We're talking dimocraps here, people. The scum of the earth

 

[G.T.]

I think you're falling into the trap that the R's wanted you to fall into. They played it perfectly when they get responses like this. And good for them, because the D's are equally as retarded.

 

[Edgetho]

I think you're falling into the trap that the R's wanted you to fall into. They played it perfectly when they get responses like this. And good for them, because the D's are equally as retarded.

Falling into a trap, huh?

Pretty clever of them.

Look Sherlock..... There was a bill to restore Veterans benefits and 164 Congressmen voted against it and killed it.

EVERY MOTHERFUCKING ONE OF THEM WAS A dimocrap.

Explain to me how that's a trap......

 

[G.T.]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.




Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

 

[Wildman]

We're talking dimocraps here, people. The scum of the earth

saying they are scum of the Earth, is an insult to the real true "SCUM OF THE EARTHERS"

 

[Edgetho]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.




Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

Say..... Did you write this?

NY Mag Writer Mocks WWII Veterans Barred From D.C. Memorial…

I have more respect for a two day old pile of dog shit than I do this jackass.

Via Breitbart:

New York Magazine writer Jonathan Chait spent his government shutdown day mocking WWII veterans who were shut out by the National Park Service (NPS) when they came to visit the National WWII Memorial in Washington, D.C.

On Tuesday morning, Representative Michelle Bachman (R-MN) and several Republican members of Congress helped tear down the barricades shutting the elderly veterans out of the WWII memorial. After the barricades were removed, dozens of veterans flooded in to conduct their often emotional visits.

But, thinking he was being funny, Chait took to Twitter to poke fun at the veterans, joking that the NPS should barricade the memorial with old Nazi soldiers.

Keep reading…

- See more at: Weasel Zippers | Scouring the bowels of the internet | Weasel Zippers

Typical dimocrap scumbag. They're all the same.

 

[billyerock1991]

Every time I think it isn't possible for dimocraps to sink any lower......

They do

Vote summary: 264-164. Failed (required 2/3 majority).

This bill would have restored funding for American veterans' benefits. The 164 Democrats listed on this page don't think veterans' benefits are important enough to pay for. Click the tweet buttons to ask them why.

Source: clerk.house.gov/ ...

Andrews
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cárdenas
Carney
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Conyers
Costa
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farr
Fattah
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Garamendi
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutiérrez
Hahn
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Higgins
Himes
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huffman
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kind
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Luján, Ben Ray (NM)
Maloney, Carolyn
Matsui
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Richmond
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth

Here's a tweet dealio if you want to express your displeasure
164 Democrats Voted Against American Veterans

Like it'll do any good.

We're talking dimocraps here, people. The scum of the earth

I hope all the democrats said no
other wise they're not doing their job

 

[Black_Label]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.




Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

Say..... Did you write this?

NY Mag Writer Mocks WWII Veterans Barred From D.C. Memorial…

I have more respect for a two day old pile of dog shit than I do this jackass.

Via Breitbart:

New York Magazine writer Jonathan Chait spent his government shutdown day mocking WWII veterans who were shut out by the National Park Service (NPS) when they came to visit the National WWII Memorial in Washington, D.C.

On Tuesday morning, Representative Michelle Bachman (R-MN) and several Republican members of Congress helped tear down the barricades shutting the elderly veterans out of the WWII memorial. After the barricades were removed, dozens of veterans flooded in to conduct their often emotional visits.

But, thinking he was being funny, Chait took to Twitter to poke fun at the veterans, joking that the NPS should barricade the memorial with old Nazi soldiers.

Keep reading…

- See more at: Weasel Zippers | Scouring the bowels of the internet | Weasel Zippers

Typical dimocrap scumbag. They're all the same.

This is a shame, those on the far right are disgusting filth.

 

[G.T.]

A magazine writer who is a retard.

In a thread about Democrats vs. Republicans' tactics in the Congress.

Makes sense, I guess.

 

[billyerock1991]

We're talking dimocraps here, people. The scum of the earth

saying they are scum of the Earth, is an insult to the real true "SCUM OF THE EARTHERS"

you must me talking about repub-lie-scum

 

[billyerock1991]

I think you're falling into the trap that the R's wanted you to fall into. They played it perfectly when they get responses like this. And good for them, because the D's are equally as retarded.

Falling into a trap, huh?

Pretty clever of them.

Look Sherlock..... There was a bill to restore Veterans benefits and 164 Congressmen voted against it and killed it.

EVERY MOTHERFUCKING ONE OF THEM WAS A dimocrap.

Explain to me how that's a trap......

all I want to know is who are the dems that said yes ... that way we can vote them out in their primary ... get dems who would have said no into
office

 

[Brain357]

Every time I think it isn't possible for dimocraps to sink any lower......

They do

Vote summary: 264-164. Failed (required 2/3 majority).

This bill would have restored funding for American veterans' benefits. The 164 Democrats listed on this page don't think veterans' benefits are important enough to pay for. Click the tweet buttons to ask them why.

Source: clerk.house.gov/ ...

Andrews
Bass
Beatty
Becerra
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Bonamici
Brady (PA)
Brown (FL)
Brownley (CA)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cárdenas
Carney
Cartwright
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Conyers
Costa
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Danny
DeFazio
DeGette
Delaney
DeLauro
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farr
Fattah
Frankel (FL)
Fudge
Gabbard
Garamendi
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutiérrez
Hahn
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Higgins
Himes
Holt
Honda
Horsford
Hoyer
Huffman
Israel
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kind
Kirkpatrick
Kuster
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Luján, Ben Ray (NM)
Maloney, Carolyn
Matsui
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Meng
Michaud
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Negrete McLeod
Nolan
O'Rourke
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Richmond
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell (AL)
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Yarmuth

Here's a tweet dealio if you want to express your displeasure
164 Democrats Voted Against American Veterans

Like it'll do any good.

We're talking dimocraps here, people. The scum of the earth

I think the scum are the ones playing politics with veterans benefits.

 

[billyerock1991]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.




Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

you realize you're trying to get a republican to think here don't ya... you see republicans are trying to get some of the government open so they don't look as bad as they do now ... come 2014 they will be falling out of office as fast as humanly possible

 

[DiamondDave]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.




Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

Wait a minute.. but when REPs vote against a 'veterans' bill (even though it has riders and add ins that are not for veterans and that drag the bill down) and some asshole leftist like rdummy makes a thread bashing them, you DON'T have the same reaction????



Color me shocked

 

[birddog]

Both parties share all the blame, but the dims have the far biggest share. The dictator, illegal tactics of B. Hussein Obama and his cohorts are unprecedented and disgusting. Anyone supporting Reid and Obama's tactics is also disgusting!

 

[G.T.]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.




Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

Wait a minute.. but when REPs vote against a 'veterans' bill (even though it has riders and add ins that are not for veterans and that drag the bill down) and some asshole leftist like rdummy makes a thread bashing them, you DON'T have the same reaction????



Color me shocked

I'm sorry you're my fan and I don't get to every thread you hope for me to appear in.

I'll try harder though, bruv. I really will.

 

[TooTall]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.


Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

BS, the Democrats voted against FUNDING THE VETERANS. Their purpose was to blame the Republicans for the vets not being funded, PERIOD.

 

[Black_Label]

Both parties share all the blame, but the dims have the far biggest share. The dictator, illegal tactics of B. Hussein Obama and his cohorts are unprecedented and disgusting. Anyone supporting Reid and Obama's tactics is also disgusting!

You are a fucking idiot. The butthurt teabaggers are holding the nation hostage in a complete desperation attempt with the affordable care act to get their way. They are terrorists in every sense of the word.

 

[G.T.]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.


Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

BS, the Democrats voted against FUNDING THE VETERANS. Their purpose was to blame the Republicans for the vets not being funded, PERIOD.

Sounds.....

convoluted.

But, ok.

 

[DiamondDave]

It's a trap because the reasoning behind voting against it was not because they don't want Veterans funded. You better research if anyone of them ARE Veterans.

No, instead, many of them if not all of them voted against it because they want the ENTIRE Government funded, not the piece by piece stuff.

But the R's didn't want you to know the logic behind voting against it.

They wanted you to say "LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE AGAINST OUR BRAVE VETS!!!!!"


And here you are, like their good 'lil doggy.

Good job on their part, tbh. It served their purpose.




Tell me, are the R's "AGAINST FUNDING VETERANS!!!!!" when they won't even take up a vote on the clean CR the Senate passed............which includes FUNDING THE VETERANS?

You play their game like a good little boy man. You do that.

Wait a minute.. but when REPs vote against a 'veterans' bill (even though it has riders and add ins that are not for veterans and that drag the bill down) and some asshole leftist like rdummy makes a thread bashing them, you DON'T have the same reaction????



Color me shocked

I'm sorry you're my fan and I don't get to every thread you hope for me to appear in.

I'll try harder though, bruv. I really will.

I don't get in every thread either

Funny though.. how you don't bash those that are on the far left.. even when their actions are the same as those across the fence.. and you make a point to go against them... want the link to rdummy's thread/post so you can go on record for once attacking one of his ilk??