Liberal ‘Feeling’ vs. Knowing

[william the wie]

1.One of the reasons well meaning persons tend toward support of Democrats/Liberals

Well meaning people do not support communst leftards, ever.

decent people do not support fascist righttards....ever.....

The cool thing is; when you twisted lowlifes say “decent people” we know exactly what you mean....hahaha

Feel free to keep lying, cut and paste Queen.

Now go idolize commander bone spur while you denigrate actual heroes

Wackos. All trump scum are wackos

The great thing about having opponents with as low a lever of intelligence and integrity.....you know, like you......is the ease with which I can put you in your place.

Watch this:

"Feel free to keep lying, cut and paste Queen."


Yet you couldn't find any lie to point to.





I really need a higher level of opposition than these clay pigeons.
But.....if that's all the Left can serve up.......I'll have to keep shooting 'em down.




Reminder: our pal Jill the Pill is a supporter of this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

PC, considering that your opponent is a lefty shouldn't you stick to words of no more than three syllables?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well meaning people do not support communst leftards, ever.

decent people do not support fascist righttards....ever.....

The cool thing is; when you twisted lowlifes say “decent people” we know exactly what you mean....hahaha

Feel free to keep lying, cut and paste Queen.

Now go idolize commander bone spur while you denigrate actual heroes

Wackos. All trump scum are wackos

The great thing about having opponents with as low a lever of intelligence and integrity.....you know, like you......is the ease with which I can put you in your place.

Watch this:

"Feel free to keep lying, cut and paste Queen."


Yet you couldn't find any lie to point to.





I really need a higher level of opposition than these clay pigeons.
But.....if that's all the Left can serve up.......I'll have to keep shooting 'em down.




Reminder: our pal Jill the Pill is a supporter of this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

PC, considering that your opponent is a lefty shouldn't you stick to words of no more than three syllables?

I REFUSE TO DUMB DOWN THE INSIGHTS FOR THAT AUDIENCE!!!


But....I might provide some bird feed if she'd stop that annoying bobbing her head like a parakeet.

 

[Moonglow]

Well meaning people do not support communst leftards, ever.

decent people do not support fascist righttards....ever.....

The cool thing is; when you twisted lowlifes say “decent people” we know exactly what you mean....hahaha

Feel free to keep lying, cut and paste Queen.

Now go idolize commander bone spur while you denigrate actual heroes

Wackos. All trump scum are wackos

The great thing about having opponents with as low a lever of intelligence and integrity.....you know, like you......is the ease with which I can put you in your place.

Watch this:

"Feel free to keep lying, cut and paste Queen."


Yet you couldn't find any lie to point to.





I really need a higher level of opposition than these clay pigeons.
But.....if that's all the Left can serve up.......I'll have to keep shooting 'em down.




Reminder: our pal Jill the Pill is a supporter of this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

PC, considering that your opponent is a lefty shouldn't you stick to words of no more than three syllables?

She does , everything else is cut-n-paste....

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

 

[Moonglow]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

Damn those religious schools they will let anyone go there....

 

[WEATHER53]

If it does not match their sentiments then it’s not the truth and the provider of the fact is racist or some form of “ist”

 

[OldLady]

Now, about that Liberal 'feeling' that doing away with hard work and responsibility is good for minorities, or for America......




4. Facing facts is hardly a characteristic of Liberals/Progressives. As a result the equality that they hope for is spread evenly….as misery.

“The mismatch effect happens when a school extends to a student such a large admissions preference -- …usually because of the student's race -- that the student finds himself in a class where he has weaker academic preparation than nearly all of his classmates. The student who would flourish at, say, Wake Forest or the University of Richmond, instead finds himself at Duke, where the professors are not teaching at a pace designed for him -- …


…even though blacks are more likely to enter college than are whites with similar backgrounds, they will usually get much lower grades, rank toward the bottom of the class, and far more often drop out. Because of mismatch, racial preference policies often stigmatize minorities, reinforce pernicious stereotypes, and undermine the self-confidence of beneficiaries, rather than creating the diverse racial utopias so often advertised in college campus brochures.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action


Perhaps we should judge the agenda by the results.

And Liberalism.....the same.





5. The next element of Liberal lack of understanding is in how failure will affect that minority student: it will be blamed, exactly where Liberals what in, on racism, on white privilege, on every thing but the truth.

“…assume that you and the friend who joined you at the bottom of that class were both black and everyone else was Asian or white. How would that have felt? Might you have imagined that this could reinforce in the minds of your classmates the stereotype that blacks are weak students?” Ibid.

The SAT's are adding the diversity score, which ANY college the student applies to can see, btw and factor out if they want to. It is not a score boosted by elite colleges; in fact it has nothing to do with the colleges at all; it is the same SAT report if the student applies to his local community college or to Yale. READ THIS.
SAT to Give Students ‘Adversity Score’ to Capture Social and Economic Background

 

[OldLady]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

SAT 'adversity score': Is it necessary?
The WSJ article wanted a subscription, but this one covers the story as well. May I note that the "adversity score" does not have to do with race but with zipcode? It could just as easily help a bright student from a not so great rural school as a bright student from the 'hood.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

SAT 'adversity score': Is it necessary?
The WSJ article wanted a subscription, but this one covers the story as well. May I note that the "adversity score" does not have to do with race but with zipcode? It could just as easily help a bright student from a not so great rural school as a bright student from the 'hood.

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

Take the blinders off.....wise up.

 

[OldLady]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

SAT 'adversity score': Is it necessary?
The WSJ article wanted a subscription, but this one covers the story as well. May I note that the "adversity score" does not have to do with race but with zipcode? It could just as easily help a bright student from a not so great rural school as a bright student from the 'hood.

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

Take the blinders off.....wise up.

Oh, that ought to enlighten me.

 

[hadit]

Magical thinking is the only thinking the left lumpen secretariat does.

Yet conservatives spend more time on their knees adorating a statue

??? Who does that?

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

SAT 'adversity score': Is it necessary?
The WSJ article wanted a subscription, but this one covers the story as well. May I note that the "adversity score" does not have to do with race but with zipcode? It could just as easily help a bright student from a not so great rural school as a bright student from the 'hood.

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

Take the blinders off.....wise up.

Oh, that ought to enlighten me.

If you voted for the administration that aimed for compulsory abortions, nothing will 'enlighten' you.





Discussed many times, liberalism is another name for the political religion of the Left. Charles Darwin is the prophet, and while there is naught wrong with a belief in evolution, once one removes any sense that humans are of a higher order than any other form of life, there are repercussions, often, not expected.

1. Obama selected regulatory czar Cass Sunstein has suggested that animals have the right to lawyers, and advocated that animals have the right to sue humans in court:






2. . Obama choice for Science Czar John Holdren has endorsed compulsory sterilization, as in ‘controlling the herd.”
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control.”
Obama's science czar suggested compulsory abortion, sterilization | Washington Examiner






3. Considering humans the equivalent of any other animal gives us Professor Peter Singer:
“Singer, a bioethics professor at Princeton University, is a leader in the animal rights movement. He has also argued that abortion should be permissible because unborn babies as old as 18 weeks cannot feel pain or satisfaction.
Singer once explained his belief that, "killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living." Obama czar pick: 'Raving animal rights nut'

“I do think that it is sometimes appropriate to kill a human infant. For me, the relevant question is, what makes it so seriously wrong to take a life? Those of you who are not vegetarians are responsible for taking a life every time you eat. Species is no more relevant than race in making these judgments.” What price is life? Peter Singer and Obamacare Can I Just Finish My Waffle?
Peter Singer was appointed by Obama as part of his Health Care Team... Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators : I Am Not a Fan of Peter Singer Story & Experience



You nuts certainly have representation.

 

[OldLady]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

SAT 'adversity score': Is it necessary?
The WSJ article wanted a subscription, but this one covers the story as well. May I note that the "adversity score" does not have to do with race but with zipcode? It could just as easily help a bright student from a not so great rural school as a bright student from the 'hood.

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

Take the blinders off.....wise up.

Oh, that ought to enlighten me.

If you voted for the administration that aimed for compulsory abortions, nothing will 'enlighten' you.





Discussed many times, liberalism is another name for the political religion of the Left. Charles Darwin is the prophet, and while there is naught wrong with a belief in evolution, once one removes any sense that humans are of a higher order than any other form of life, there are repercussions, often, not expected.

1. Obama selected regulatory czar Cass Sunstein has suggested that animals have the right to lawyers, and advocated that animals have the right to sue humans in court:






2. . Obama choice for Science Czar John Holdren has endorsed compulsory sterilization, as in ‘controlling the herd.”
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control.”
Obama's science czar suggested compulsory abortion, sterilization | Washington Examiner






3. Considering humans the equivalent of any other animal gives us Professor Peter Singer:
“Singer, a bioethics professor at Princeton University, is a leader in the animal rights movement. He has also argued that abortion should be permissible because unborn babies as old as 18 weeks cannot feel pain or satisfaction.
Singer once explained his belief that, "killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living." Obama czar pick: 'Raving animal rights nut'

“I do think that it is sometimes appropriate to kill a human infant. For me, the relevant question is, what makes it so seriously wrong to take a life? Those of you who are not vegetarians are responsible for taking a life every time you eat. Species is no more relevant than race in making these judgments.” What price is life? Peter Singer and Obamacare Can I Just Finish My Waffle?
Peter Singer was appointed by Obama as part of his Health Care Team... Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators : I Am Not a Fan of Peter Singer Story & Experience



You nuts certainly have representation.

That has absolutely nothing to do with Affirmative Action or SAT's. Nice try turning the thread. Well, it's your thread, go ahead, but I didn't come here to talk about abortion or evolution, so until next time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Truth is frequently a casualty when Liberals view the catastrophic results of their agendas.



“… university leaders view discussion of the mismatch problem as a threat to affirmative action and to racial peace on campuses, and therefore a subject to be avoided. They suppress data and even often ostracize faculty who attempt to point out the seriousness of mismatch. (See, for instance, the case of UT professor Lino Graglia, who was condemned by university officials after he observed that black and Mexican-American students were "not academically competitive" with their white peers.) We believe that the willful denial of the mismatch issue is as big a problem as mismatch itself.

The quest for racial sensitivity has created environments in which it is not only difficult but downright risky for students and professors, not to mention administrators, to talk about what affirmative action has become and about the nature and effects of large admissions preferences. Simply acknowledging the fact that large preferences exist can trigger accusations that one is insulting or stigmatizing minority groups; suggesting that these preferences have counterproductive effects can lead to the immediate inference that one wants to eliminate or cut back efforts to help minority students.”
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

To hide truth, the first amendment has become the target of the Democrats and Liberals.
A knife through the heart of America.



9. ‘It has also made racial preferences a force for economic inequality: academically well-prepared working class and poor Asian and white students are routinely passed over in favor of black and Hispanic students who are more affluent as well as less well-prepared.’
Ibid.



In short, merit has been replaced by melanin.

Is that the America you Liberals want?

SAT 'adversity score': Is it necessary?
The WSJ article wanted a subscription, but this one covers the story as well. May I note that the "adversity score" does not have to do with race but with zipcode? It could just as easily help a bright student from a not so great rural school as a bright student from the 'hood.

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

Take the blinders off.....wise up.

Oh, that ought to enlighten me.

If you voted for the administration that aimed for compulsory abortions, nothing will 'enlighten' you.





Discussed many times, liberalism is another name for the political religion of the Left. Charles Darwin is the prophet, and while there is naught wrong with a belief in evolution, once one removes any sense that humans are of a higher order than any other form of life, there are repercussions, often, not expected.

1. Obama selected regulatory czar Cass Sunstein has suggested that animals have the right to lawyers, and advocated that animals have the right to sue humans in court:






2. . Obama choice for Science Czar John Holdren has endorsed compulsory sterilization, as in ‘controlling the herd.”
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control.”
Obama's science czar suggested compulsory abortion, sterilization | Washington Examiner






3. Considering humans the equivalent of any other animal gives us Professor Peter Singer:
“Singer, a bioethics professor at Princeton University, is a leader in the animal rights movement. He has also argued that abortion should be permissible because unborn babies as old as 18 weeks cannot feel pain or satisfaction.
Singer once explained his belief that, "killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living." Obama czar pick: 'Raving animal rights nut'

“I do think that it is sometimes appropriate to kill a human infant. For me, the relevant question is, what makes it so seriously wrong to take a life? Those of you who are not vegetarians are responsible for taking a life every time you eat. Species is no more relevant than race in making these judgments.” What price is life? Peter Singer and Obamacare Can I Just Finish My Waffle?
Peter Singer was appointed by Obama as part of his Health Care Team... Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators : I Am Not a Fan of Peter Singer Story & Experience



You nuts certainly have representation.

That has absolutely nothing to do with Affirmative Action or SAT's. Nice try turning the thread. Well, it's your thread, go ahead, but I didn't come here to talk about abortion or evolution, so until next time.

You begged for enlightenment.

That's what I provided.

Did you find anything not consistent with your views?

No?

Exactly my point.

 

[BlindBoo]

That's funny. Everyone know pseudo-cons mostly rely on truthiness to sway their base.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's funny. Everyone know pseudo-cons mostly rely on truthiness to sway their base.

What's truly funny is that, you still haven't learned that everything I post is 100% true, accurate, and correct.

As you no doubt tried to find something to dispute in my posts....but realized you could not.....that should have been a signal to you.

After all this time, one must conclude that you're about as likely to learn as mayflies are to see Christmas.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.One of the reasons well meaning persons tend toward support of Democrats/Liberals

Well meaning people do not support communst leftards, ever.

decent people do not support fascist righttards....ever.....

If we leave a window open at either side of your head....would the wind gusts be measurable on the Beaumont Scale? Need an anemometer be used?


I know I shouldn't be surprised at how ignorant you are.....Fascists are Leftists....like you.
FDR took Mussolini's Fascism and installed it in America as the New Deal.

Have you ever read a book???????


You remain the mental equivalent of a doggy chew-toy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Having bought their success on the claim that they opposed racism, Democrats/Liberals/Progressives are now showing their true......colors.



"De Blasio Is Trying to Reduce the Number of Asians In Elite NYC Schools

"A new report highlights New York City mayor and Democratic presidential candidate Bill de Blasio's effort to reduce the number of Asians in the city's top schools.

De Blasio and Democrats in the state legislature are waging a "progressive war" on the city's best schools, which are "now dominated by Asian-American students from largely poor and working-class immigrant backgrounds," according to City-Journal.

Democratic state legislators are working to get rid of the law mandating a competitive exam...


... "manipulating the admissions criteria so that many poor Asian kids no longer qualify."
De Blasio is Trying to Reduce the Number of Asians in Elite NYC Schools




What possible reason would a non-Fascist have for supporting this party:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, anti-Asian racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

 

[danielpalos]

i love, "touchy feelly"; i am into full body massage.

 

[PoliticalChic]