Let's go to the video tape ...

[kaz]

Democrats under W created:

1) Filibuster for trial and appellate judges
2) Filibuster for administration appointments
3) Filibuster for SCOTUS

Democrats under O:
1) Eliminated the filibuster for trial and appellate judges
2) Eliminated the filibuster for administration appointments
3) Left the filibuster for SCOTUS in place because Republicans confirmed his SCOTUS appointments

1) Biden had the votes to block a HW nomination in a Presidential election year and said he would
2) McConnell had the votes to block an Obama nomination in a Presidential election year and did

So Democrats, you were screwed ... where ???

Welcome to the consequences of your own actions. Karma's a bitch, huh?

 

[BluesLegend]

Sadly if you think you can shame the left, its not possible. They embrace hypocrisy and double standards without shame or remorse.

 

[g5000]

Mitch McConnell among flip-floppers on Senate's 'nuclear option'

 

[kaz]

Sadly if you think you can shame the left, its not possible. They embrace hypocrisy and double standards without shame or remorse.

I would never be so ignorant as trying to shame the left for the reason you said. I'm trying to remind people with a brain and intellectual integrity who the left are. You did see the part where I said "Karma's a bitch, huh." Right?

 

[Mac1958]

Politicians are both narcissistic and short-sighted.

Add power to that and you can have a real mess on your hands.

 

[kaz]

Mitch McConnell among flip-floppers on Senate's 'nuclear option'

Wherever a Democrat is under attack for their own actions, g5000 is there to be their codpiece

 

[g5000]

“The filibuster would be preserved for all legislative items, preserved for executive branch nominations, not for the judiciary. If we have to exercise the constitutional option tomorrow, it will be narrowly crafted to deal only with future Supreme Court appointments and circuit court appointments, which is where we believe the aberrational behavior has been occurring in the past and may occur in the future.” - Mitch McConnell, May 23, 2005.

That's when the GOP had control of Congress.

Then, here's Mitch when the Dems had control in 2013:

“It would be naive to assume that you could break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules for the Senate only for nominations. There would be a widespread clamor across our conference, where we to be in the majority, to take that precedent and apply it to everything else.”


Now, Mitch used the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

Flip-floppity-flip-flip-flip!

 

[BluesLegend]

Mitch McConnell among flip-floppers on Senate's 'nuclear option'

Wherever a Democrat is under attack for their own actions, g5000 is there to be their codpiece

Amazing isn't it, how the left suddenly are against deficits, the nuclear option, detaining 200,000 illegal minors, pretty much everything they did the past 8 years. Suddenly and without explanation they are opposed to this, wait is it because they lost the election? /mocking sarcasm

 

[g5000]

Mitch McConnell among flip-floppers on Senate's 'nuclear option'

Wherever a Democrat is under attack for their own actions, g5000 is there to be their codpiece

Whenever there is a pseudocon propagandist lie of omission which needs to be disseminated, you can always count on kaz to parrot it.

 

[dcbl]

this was the end game all along, win the damned courts...

 

[g5000]

The simple fact is that both parties have flip-flopped on the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

That is the WHOLE truth, which pseudocons choke on.

 

[BluesLegend]

Mitch McConnell among flip-floppers on Senate's 'nuclear option'

Wherever a Democrat is under attack for their own actions, g5000 is there to be their codpiece

Whenever there is a pseudocon propagandist lie of omission which needs to be disseminated, you can always count on kaz to parrot it.

WE WARNED you people not to exercise the nuclear option so just suck it up and deal with the consequences.

 

[kaz]

“The filibuster would be preserved for all legislative items, preserved for executive branch nominations, not for the judiciary. If we have to exercise the constitutional option tomorrow, it will be narrowly crafted to deal only with future Supreme Court appointments and circuit court appointments, which is where we believe the aberrational behavior has been occurring in the past and may occur in the future.” - Mitch McConnell, May 23, 2005.

That's when the GOP had control of Congress.

Then, here's Mitch when the Dems had control in 2013:

“It would be naive to assume that you could break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules for the Senate only for nominations. There would be a widespread clamor across our conference, where we to be in the majority, to take that precedent and apply it to everything else.”


Now, Mitch used the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

Flip-floppity-flip-flip-flip!

Absolutely, they're both hypocrites with their words. They both want their way. As I pointed out, the difference is that the Democrats always got it. Now you're howling like a bitch anyway

 

[kaz]

The simple fact is that both parties have flip-flopped on the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

That is the WHOLE truth, which pseudocons choke on.

You didn't read the OP on what actually happened with filibustering appointments, did you Nancy Pelosi?

 

[g5000]

“The filibuster would be preserved for all legislative items, preserved for executive branch nominations, not for the judiciary. If we have to exercise the constitutional option tomorrow, it will be narrowly crafted to deal only with future Supreme Court appointments and circuit court appointments, which is where we believe the aberrational behavior has been occurring in the past and may occur in the future.” - Mitch McConnell, May 23, 2005.

That's when the GOP had control of Congress.

Then, here's Mitch when the Dems had control in 2013:

“It would be naive to assume that you could break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules for the Senate only for nominations. There would be a widespread clamor across our conference, where we to be in the majority, to take that precedent and apply it to everything else.”


Now, Mitch used the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

Flip-floppity-flip-flip-flip!

Absolutely, they're both hypocrites with their words. They both want their way. As I pointed out, the difference is that the Democrats always got it. Now you're howling like a bitch anyway

No, both parties got their way when they were in the majority. You are one seriously retarded idiot if you think the Democrats always got their way. Your own vaunted videotape blows you away.

 

[BluesLegend]

The left are the Coyote its hilarious

 

[kaz]

“The filibuster would be preserved for all legislative items, preserved for executive branch nominations, not for the judiciary. If we have to exercise the constitutional option tomorrow, it will be narrowly crafted to deal only with future Supreme Court appointments and circuit court appointments, which is where we believe the aberrational behavior has been occurring in the past and may occur in the future.” - Mitch McConnell, May 23, 2005.

That's when the GOP had control of Congress.

Then, here's Mitch when the Dems had control in 2013:

“It would be naive to assume that you could break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules for the Senate only for nominations. There would be a widespread clamor across our conference, where we to be in the majority, to take that precedent and apply it to everything else.”


Now, Mitch used the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

Flip-floppity-flip-flip-flip!

You couldn't see a Democrat flip flop if it kicked you in the teeth, could you? Read the OP, Democrat flip flop just kicked you in the teeth ...

 

[g5000]

“The filibuster would be preserved for all legislative items, preserved for executive branch nominations, not for the judiciary. If we have to exercise the constitutional option tomorrow, it will be narrowly crafted to deal only with future Supreme Court appointments and circuit court appointments, which is where we believe the aberrational behavior has been occurring in the past and may occur in the future.” - Mitch McConnell, May 23, 2005.

That's when the GOP had control of Congress.

Then, here's Mitch when the Dems had control in 2013:

“It would be naive to assume that you could break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules for the Senate only for nominations. There would be a widespread clamor across our conference, where we to be in the majority, to take that precedent and apply it to everything else.”


Now, Mitch used the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

Flip-floppity-flip-flip-flip!

You couldn't see a Democrat flip flop if it kicked you in the teeth, could you? Read the OP, Democrat flip flop just kicked you in the teeth ...

You have no idea what a lie of omission is, do you.

That's what makes you such a good parrot.

 

[kaz]

“The filibuster would be preserved for all legislative items, preserved for executive branch nominations, not for the judiciary. If we have to exercise the constitutional option tomorrow, it will be narrowly crafted to deal only with future Supreme Court appointments and circuit court appointments, which is where we believe the aberrational behavior has been occurring in the past and may occur in the future.” - Mitch McConnell, May 23, 2005.

That's when the GOP had control of Congress.

Then, here's Mitch when the Dems had control in 2013:

“It would be naive to assume that you could break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules for the Senate only for nominations. There would be a widespread clamor across our conference, where we to be in the majority, to take that precedent and apply it to everything else.”


Now, Mitch used the nuclear option for judicial nominations.

Flip-floppity-flip-flip-flip!

Absolutely, they're both hypocrites with their words. They both want their way. As I pointed out, the difference is that the Democrats always got it. Now you're howling like a bitch anyway

No, both parties got their way when they were in the majority. You are one seriously retarded idiot if you think the Democrats always got their way. Your own vaunted videotape blows you away.

So I gave you indisputable facts. As Nancy Pelosi's codpiece, can you give some examples? She's got more balls than you do

 

[g5000]

This topic is epic proof that we get the politicians we deserve.