Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

[progressive hunter]

 

[Marener]

God damn you are dense LOL

You’re weak. You say a lot of shit and never back it up.

 

[Mashmont]

Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals.

NY AG Letitia James subpoenaed by Justice Department over $454M civil fraud case against Trump

James was hit with subpoenas as part of a grand jury probe by the Albany US Attorney’s Office into her office’s $454 million civil fraud case against President Trump.

nypost.com

When James goes after Trump, it's "Letitia James" won't put up with stuff.
When law enforcement goes after James, it's racism and vengeance.
Funny how that works.

 

[M14 Shooter]

When James goes after Trump, it's "Letitia James" won't put up with stuff.
When law enforcement goes after James, it's racism and vengeance.
Funny how that works.

Democrats lie in whatever way they believe creates the best narrative for them.

 

[Blisterfinger]

You’re weak. You say a lot of shit and never back it up.

I backed up everything I said and proved my point. I had to repeat myself a myriad of times with the same information. It just bounced off your thick skull

 

[Papageorgio]

Me and 5 grand juries. Just misguided? Shouldn't believe the videos they saw, or the signed documents they saw?

You think you can just dismiss all of that with a wave of your hand and another lazy minded false equivalence of "partisan lawfare"? No.

You also apparently think Trump's criminal conspiracy to steal the 2020 election should not have been prosecuted. Fascinating. I dont think history will agree.

All those people charged with felonies for participating, who are still awaiting trial... cut them loose?

Go on, say it. Say yes to both. To be consistent.

if Trump blanket pardons them like Biden did, yes it all goes away. The 34 convictions were by most Americans accounts a big sham. You like most far left and right wing partisans float on BS and that is what you are doing.

So if a grand jury thinks there is enough to bring Obama to trail, then we should? I don’t think so, but the far right will just like the far left thinks Trump needs tried and convicted of whatever. It is all politics Gumby.

We have crossed a line and I’m not sure how we roll it back but just as convinced that Trump and Republicans are evil, there are those that believe Biden and Democrats are just as evil.

I don’t think either side is evil, they are just working to make sure the rich stay rich and believe the two parties are doing that so well.

 

[Marener]

I backed up everything I said and proved my point. I had to repeat myself a myriad of times with the same information. It just bounced off your thick skull

No, you didnt.

This is not backing it up.

Look it up LOL

Still waiting for that law that gives the AG the authority to appoint an inferior officer as special attorney.

 

[Papageorgio]

No, you didnt.

This is not backing it up.



Still waiting for that law that gives the AG the authority to appoint an inferior officer as special attorney.

The Attorney General’s authority to appoint an “inferior officer” as a special attorney comes from 28 U.S.C. § 515.


That statute authorizes the Attorney General (or anyone specifically directed by them) to:
“conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury proceedings and proceedings before committing magistrate judges, which United States attorneys are authorized by law to conduct, whether or not he is a resident of the district in which the proceeding is brought.”

“The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding…”

This is the same section that has historically been used for special attorneys, special prosecutors, and—more recently—special counsels.

The constitutional requirement that such a person be an inferior officer comes from the Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2), which allows Congress to vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President, courts, or heads of departments. Congress did that for the Attorney General via this statute.

 

[Marener]

The Attorney General’s authority to appoint an “inferior officer” as a special attorney comes from 28 U.S.C. § 515.


That statute authorizes the Attorney General (or anyone specifically directed by them) to:
“conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury proceedings and proceedings before committing magistrate judges, which United States attorneys are authorized by law to conduct, whether or not he is a resident of the district in which the proceeding is brought.”

“The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding…”

This is the same section that has historically been used for special attorneys, special prosecutors, and—more recently—special counsels.

The constitutional requirement that such a person be an inferior officer comes from the Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2), which allows Congress to vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President, courts, or heads of departments. Congress did that for the Attorney General via this statute.

28 USC 515 doesn’t authorize creation of a special attorney. It just says what they can do.

“or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law”

This references that an attorney could be appointed “under law”, which means that you have to find the law that does so.

 

[Papageorgio]

1. Constitutional Foundation

Appointments Clause

U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 says:
Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The Attorney General is the head of the Department of Justice (a “head of department”), so if Congress authorizes it by law, the AG can appoint inferior officers — like a special attorney.

2. Statutory Authority

The Main Laws
Here are the relevant sections of Title 28 of the U.S. Code that give the AG the legal power:
28 U.S.C. § 509

Functions of the Attorney General

All functions of other officers of the Department of Justice and all functions of agencies and employees of the Department of Justice are vested in the Attorney General, except as otherwise provided by law.

This makes the AG the ultimate legal authority for DOJ functions unless Congress says otherwise.

28 U.S.C. § 515
Authority for Special Attorneys

(a) The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding…

This is the key appointment power. It lets the AG appoint a lawyer — not necessarily a DOJ employee — as a special attorney to handle cases the AG directs.

28 U.S.C. § 516

Conduct of Litigation Reserved to DOJ

Except as otherwise authorized by law, the conduct of litigation in which the United States… is a party, or is interested, and securing evidence therefor, is reserved to officers of the Department of Justice, under the direction of the Attorney General.

This means no one outside DOJ can conduct federal litigation unless the AG authorizes it — reinforcing that special attorneys act under the AG’s direction.

28 U.S.C. § 533
Investigative Authority

The Attorney General may appoint officials to detect and prosecute crimes against the United States.

While this section is more about investigators (like FBI), it supports the AG’s general authority to appoint personnel for criminal matters.










3. DOJ Regulations for Special Counsels

The current special counsel regulations are at 28 C.F.R. §§ 600.1–600.10.

These set the process and limits for appointing an outside lawyer to act with the powers of a U.S. Attorney in a specific investigation.

Example: Robert Mueller, John Durham, and Jack Smith were all appointed under this combination of statutory authority and regulations.

4. Inferior Officer Status
The Supreme Court in Morrison v. Olson (1988) and Edmond v. United States (1997) has said an inferior officer is one who is supervised and directed by higher officers (here, the AG).

Special attorneys/counsels fit that definition because they:

Have limited jurisdiction

Serve for a limited time

Report to and can be removed by the AG

The AG’s authority to appoint an inferior officer as a special attorney comes from:
Constitution: Appointments Clause
Statutes: Mainly 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 515, 516, and 533
Regulations: 28 C.F.R. Part 600 for special counsels
Case law: Morrison v. Olson, Edmond v. United States confirming they’re inferior officers.

 

[Blisterfinger]

No, you didnt.

This is not backing it up.



Still waiting for that law that gives the AG the authority to appoint an inferior officer as special attorney.

Still waiting to know the extent of your autism. I am doing no more research for your thick skull .

 

[Marener]

Still waiting to know the extent of your autism

You lied about backing up what you say.

 

[Marener]

1. Constitutional Foundation

Appointments Clause

U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 says:
Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The Attorney General is the head of the Department of Justice (a “head of department”), so if Congress authorizes it by law, the AG can appoint inferior officers — like a special attorney.

2. Statutory Authority

The Main Laws
Here are the relevant sections of Title 28 of the U.S. Code that give the AG the legal power:
28 U.S.C. § 509

Functions of the Attorney General

All functions of other officers of the Department of Justice and all functions of agencies and employees of the Department of Justice are vested in the Attorney General, except as otherwise provided by law.

This makes the AG the ultimate legal authority for DOJ functions unless Congress says otherwise.

28 U.S.C. § 515
Authority for Special Attorneys

(a) The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding…

This is the key appointment power. It lets the AG appoint a lawyer — not necessarily a DOJ employee — as a special attorney to handle cases the AG directs.

28 U.S.C. § 516

Conduct of Litigation Reserved to DOJ

Except as otherwise authorized by law, the conduct of litigation in which the United States… is a party, or is interested, and securing evidence therefor, is reserved to officers of the Department of Justice, under the direction of the Attorney General.

This means no one outside DOJ can conduct federal litigation unless the AG authorizes it — reinforcing that special attorneys act under the AG’s direction.

28 U.S.C. § 533
Investigative Authority

The Attorney General may appoint officials to detect and prosecute crimes against the United States.

While this section is more about investigators (like FBI), it supports the AG’s general authority to appoint personnel for criminal matters.










3. DOJ Regulations for Special Counsels

The current special counsel regulations are at 28 C.F.R. §§ 600.1–600.10.

These set the process and limits for appointing an outside lawyer to act with the powers of a U.S. Attorney in a specific investigation.

Example: Robert Mueller, John Durham, and Jack Smith were all appointed under this combination of statutory authority and regulations.

4. Inferior Officer Status
The Supreme Court in Morrison v. Olson (1988) and Edmond v. United States (1997) has said an inferior officer is one who is supervised and directed by higher officers (here, the AG).

Special attorneys/counsels fit that definition because they:

Have limited jurisdiction

Serve for a limited time

Report to and can be removed by the AG

The AG’s authority to appoint an inferior officer as a special attorney comes from:
Constitution: Appointments Clause
Statutes: Mainly 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 515, 516, and 533
Regulations: 28 C.F.R. Part 600 for special counsels
Case law: Morrison v. Olson, Edmond v. United States confirming they’re inferior officers.

Did you write this yourself?

These statutes all say what the AG can do with officers, but none of them give her the authority to appoint a special attorney.

 

[Blisterfinger]

You lied about backing up what you say.

Doing no more research for your thick skull. I will just be repeating myself more. Maybe it will penetrate maybe it won't. About that autism? Why are you ignoring that question?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Still waiting to know the extent of your autism. I am doing no more research for your thick skull .

He's
Trolling
You

 

[Marener]

Doing no more research for your thick skull. I will just be repeating myself more. Maybe it will penetrate maybe it won't. About that autism? Why are you ignoring that question?View attachment 1149304

That’s not a law. When are you going to back up your claim with an actual law and not AI?

Aileen Cannon found no law to back up the appointment of a special attorney. Was she wrong?

 

[Blisterfinger]

That’s not a law. When are you going to back up your claim with an actual law and not AI?

Aileen Cannon found no law to back up the appointment of a special attorney. Was she wrong?

Your autism? I told you I'm doing no more research for you thick skull.

 

[Marener]

Your autism? I told you I'm doing no more research for you thick skull.

Then don’t try to pretend that you’re backing up your claims.

You’re not.

Why do you think an AI search has more to say about the topic than a judicial ruling?

 

[Papageorgio]

Did you write this yourself?

These statutes all say what the AG can do with officers, but none of them give her the authority to appoint a special attorney.

The AG’s authority to appoint an inferior officer as a special attorney comes from:
Constitution: Appointments Clause
Statutes: Mainly 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 515, 516, and 533
Regulations: 28 C.F.R. Part 600 for special counsels
Case law: Morrison v. Olson, Edmond v. United States confirming they’re inferior officers.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Then don’t try to pretend that you’re backing up your claims.

You’re not.

Why do you think an AI search has more to say about the topic than a judicial ruling?

I backed up my claim. You are autistic and thick skilled. Kind of stupid too. This has gotten pretty easy. Now, about your autism.. I'm sorry about that .