Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

Jack Smith and the special attorney appointed to look into Leticia James and Adam Schiff malfeasance are two different animals.( Say it With Me Now) a special attorney and a special prosecutor are two different things . They are covered differently in the Constitution and required different criteria .

What’s the difference?
 
It's on now with these fraud political lawyers who colluded with the Biden administration

Way back in 2021 and 2022, I predicted that the government was going down a bad path of making bogus charges on political enemies and that what is good for the goose was good for the gander and now we see it come full circle. They brought this on themselves, no they will pay.
 
Way back in 2021 and 2022, I predicted that the government was going down a bad path of making bogus charges on political enemies and that what is good for the goose was good for the gander and now we see it come full circle. They brought this on themselves, no they will pay.
Right, but your claims were hilarious bullshit, given the mountains of evidence made publicly available.
 
I'm not obsessed with justice being doled it. Just happy that it's going to doled out to that nasty, hateful, corrupt woman. :113:
No really. Why do you always do this to yourself? I guess the mountain of similar fails has made you numb.
 
Look it up LOL. I've already explained this you autistic little bastard
You’ve made the claim but have provided no legal explanation for why you think they’re different.

Does it make you mad when people ask you to prove what you say?
 
You know there was a trial, right? With trump having every opportunity to defend himself. The jury weighed the evidence against trump's defense and voted to convict.

The appeal is based on trump claiming the case should be retroactively moved to a federal court based on the allowance that federal officers can request a trial in one. But he wasn't a federal officer when he committed the crimes he was convicted for. So the appeal is based on a long shot loophole, not his innocence.

BTW, do you know who Ed Martin is?

Two of the people familiar with the matter said that the new subpoenas were part of a broader investigation to determine whether the office had violated the rights of Mr. Trump or others. It is a highly unusual use of a civil rights law more typically used to investigate potential racial, religious or sex discrimination, among other categories.

On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi also appointed Ed Martin — the far-right former interim U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C. — as a special prosecutor to supervise an ongoing investigation into Ms. James’s real estate dealings, according to two people briefed on the move.

Ms. James’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, on Friday called the investigation related to the fraud case against Mr. Trump “the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president’s political retribution campaign.” He added that the appointment of Mr. Martin “makes it crystal clear this is a manufactured investigation to pursue political retribution.”


He's the guy who had his name withdrawn for a confirmation hearing to become a US Attorney because he's so batshyte crazy corrupt even Repub senators, who do just about everything trump tells them to do, would not support him. So Dotard put him in the DoJ.

Simple question that has never been answered relative to Queen Letitia's "fraud" case against Donald Trump:

WHO WAS THE FRAUD VICTIM?
Maybe you have the answer bergy. Hmmmm? :dunno:
 
You’ve made the claim but have provided no legal explanation for why you think they’re different.

Does it make you mad when people ask you to prove what you say?
Damn man, stupid or autistic. What a shame. I'll talk at you later!
 
Simple question that has never been answered relative to Queen Letitia's "fraud" case against Donald Trump:

WHO WAS THE FRAUD VICTIM?
That question was directly answered, in great depth and detail, at the trial.

Coming here is like stepping into an alternate reality.
 
Right, but your claims were hilarious bullshit, given the mountains of evidence made publicly available.
If you believe so, you go right ahead, but as far as most Americans see it, Trump trial was a sham and if they follow through with this, it will be a sham as well. The difference between partisans and independents, is independents see through the BS, you don’t.

I’m waiting for Trumps final pardons to come out and see what he does there in protecting his supporters like Biden did.
 
If you believe so, you go right ahead
Me and 5 grand juries. Just misguided? Shouldn't believe the videos they saw, or the signed documents they saw?

You think you can just dismiss all of that with a wave of your hand and another lazy minded false equivalence of "partisan lawfare"? No.

You also apparently think Trump's criminal conspiracy to steal the 2020 election should not have been prosecuted. Fascinating. I dont think history will agree.

All those people charged with felonies for participating, who are still awaiting trial... cut them loose?

Go on, say it. Say yes to both. To be consistent.
 
15th post
It is very common for AG’s to run on indicting crime bosses for their crimes.
trump isnt a crime boss, as much as you all want him to be.

You can't run for office on a witch hunt. Telling people you are going to use your office to try and find crimes to sue people for.


Rudy Guliani ran on indicting Mafia bosses and he named names.

Trump openly bragged about bribing New York politicians as a real estate developer. Trump’s hatred of Jerry Nadler stems from Nadler’s refusal to accept his bribes and let Trump use “eminent domain” to throw elderly residents out of their homes.

Trump is HATED in New York, which has NEVER voted for Trump in any election. That includes Wall Street and business leaders.

Amazing, because new york loved him until he ran for office.

James ran on ending Trumps flagrant fraud and bribery crimes. INDICTING Trump is what New York residents VOTED FOR.

Thats fine, when a crime happens, then you indict. You dont run your campaign vowing to sue people for whatever crime you can dig up on someone.

Where did trump brag about bribing people. Link that please.
 
That’s exactly my point. When did Congress give the AG the authority to appoint a special prosecutor?

Courts have typically upheld that the appointments clause, along with congress' grant of rule making allows the AG to appoint inferior officers.
 
Courts have typically upheld that the appointments clause, along with congress' grant of rule making allows the AG to appoint inferior officers.
Aileen Cannon didn’t. That’s how she justified dismissing the case against Trump in Florida.
 
Back
Top Bottom