Blisterfinger
Platinum Member
- May 15, 2021
- 19,150
- 10,184
- 1,138
All laws are about the Constitution. About your autism?Again, it’s not about the constitution. It’s about Congress.
How did Cannon get it so wrong?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All laws are about the Constitution. About your autism?Again, it’s not about the constitution. It’s about Congress.
How did Cannon get it so wrong?
When they confirmed her. See how simple it is? I am doing no more research for you. It's a waste of timeIt specifically says Congress has to vest the authority in the AG.
When did it do that?
You know Trump lost the case...Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals.
![]()
NY AG Letitia James subpoenaed by Justice Department over $454M civil fraud case against Trump
James was hit with subpoenas as part of a grand jury probe by the Albany US Attorney’s Office into her office’s $454 million civil fraud case against President Trump.nypost.com
That doesn’t make any sense. Constitution says that Congress can make a law vesting the authority in the AG.All laws are about the Constitution. About your autism?
Uh, no. That’s not a law. You are refusing to back up your claims.When they confirmed her. See how simple it is? I am doing no more research for you. It's a waste of time
It says she has the right to appoint a special attorney in the Constitution! What about that don't you understand?Uh, no. That’s not a law. You are refusing to back up your claims.
It says she has the right in the Constitution and that's good enough for me. NextUh, no. That’s not a law. You are refusing to back up your claims.
I explained that the constitution doesn’t give her the authority. It specifically says Congress can if it so chooses. Do you understand that or not?It says she has the right to appoint a special attorney in the Constitution! What about that don't you understand?
LOL what a whitewash. OK I'll ask you since all of your Leftist Trump Hater friends failed to answer it. Who was the victim of the alleged FRAUD in Queen Letitita's FRAUD case against Donald Trump?You know Trump lost the case...
So how does this go? Why did you prosecute the criminal who you got a conviction.
It's her job....

Actually you didn't. I proved that she can. What is it about the appointments Claus don't you understand? Maybe I can helpI explained that the constitution doesn’t give her the authority. It specifically says Congress can if it so chooses. Do you understand that or not?
I did. And your own copy/paste confirms it.Actually you didn't
My copy paste confirms my point. What about it don't you understand?I did. And your own copy/paste confirms it.
What do you think it means when it says “Congress has the authority to vest appointments”? What does that mean to you?My copy paste confirms my point. What about it don't you understand?
Because Smith had much broader powers, more like a primary officer instead of an inferior officer.Smith’s appointment was struck down by Aileen Cannon and the charges were thrown out.
No one else had their appointment challenged in court.
Does our hearts good to see you admit that Biden's weaponization of the criminal justice system was nothing more than an unconstitutional scam.In order to appoint an inferior officer, Congress needs to have given the AG authority to do so.
None of these statutes create an office for which the AG can place an inferior officer.
It was a case with no victim at all. In fact, the so-called “victim” wanted to testify on behalf of Trump.LOL what a whitewash. OK I'll ask you since all of your Leftist Trump Hater friends failed to answer it. Who was the victim of the alleged FRAUD in Queen Letitita's FRAUD case against Donald Trump?![]()
That’s false. Cannon does discuss whether Smith is an inferior officer or a principle officer, but ultimately does not make a decision one way or another because it has no real bearing on her decision as she found that there is no legal basis to appoint an inferior officer either.Because Smith had much broader powers, more like a primary officer instead of an inferior officer.
Cannon’s reasoning hinged on the idea that Smith’s independence, dual investigations, and U.S. Attorney–level powers pushed him beyond the category of an “inferior officer” — meaning, in her view, Garland couldn’t legally appoint him without the Senate. Garland gave him too much power and leeway, while other special prosecutors had to abide by many more codes and regulations.
You just really need the answer the question what about the appointments Clause don't you understand. By vesting The Authority it means giving the authority to the president, the courts of law, the heads of departments including the Attorney General as head of the Department of Justice to, appoint the inferior officer. That's what it says fool. As an autistic person you obviously stopped reading beyond the "Congress vested". these inferior officers, such as a special attorney, can be appointed by these people . It's becoming clear with your condition you only see what you want to see. There is help available however for you , I could look up an 800 number for you I'd be willing to do that. That is all the time I'm going to waste with you today! Talk at you laterWhat do you think it means when it says “Congress has the authority to vest appointments”? What does that mean to you?