Two new criminal referrals filed against Letitia James.

[forkup]

It took them years to get Capone even on tax evasion. That was a last ditch effort to get him on something because they couldn't get him on anything else though they knew he was guilty.


Ordinary citizens know nothing of the law. They just do what the court tells them to do. And citizens and courtrooms of today are not the same as they were 100 years ago, everything is politics now. So I say, keep plugging ahead, if they think they have a case against James, TRY HER. Like Capone, just keep trying her on everything you think she is guilty of or you can get her on until you get her.

Time for her to get a taste of the legal system she abused for herself and for her own personal gain for years.

A grand jury has only ONE person representing the government... the prosecutor. There's no judge. So IF a GJ just does what the government tells them James would have been indicted 3 times and not barely by one.

 

[BlindBoo]

Bill Pulte said in a letter Wednesday to prosecutors in Florida that James may have falsified information on her homeowner's insurance application

Hahahahaha. May is the key word there. The Grand Jury may ask for evidence of this serious crime before indicting her.

 

[toobfreak]

A grand jury has only ONE person representing the government... the prosecutor. There's no judge. So IF a GJ just does what the government tells them James would have been indicted 3 times and not barely by one.

Whatever. I was speaking of a normal court of law. In James case, it is probably a problem like in NYC or DC where you cannot get an honest jury which is not already 100% biased for anyone just because they are a democrat.

Just keep suing her ass off until the is bankrupt then arrest her for vagrancy.

 

[Blaster]

Wonder if Letitia James will sue the govt some day, like Gen. Flynn and Trump's Doj will settle and pay her, like Flynn.....?

Sue for what?

 

[DonGlock26]

Hahahahaha. May is the key word there. The Grand Jury may ask for evidence of this serious crime before indicting her.

Of course.

 

[forkup]

Whatever. I was speaking of a normal court of law. In James case, it is probably a problem like in NYC or DC where you cannot get an honest jury which is not already 100% biased for anyone just because they are a democrat.

Just keep suing her ass off until the is bankrupt then arrest her for vagrancy.

I see, so it's not that she's actually guilty of crimes, it's simply that you want revenge... got it. Guess that simply makes you an asshole

 

[toobfreak]

I see, so it's not that she's actually guilty of crimes, it's simply that you want revenge... got it. Guess that simply makes you an asshole

Still having trouble with remedial reading I see.

Once again:

It is a given she's guilty. We both know she's guilty. All I'm advocating for is to keep trying until we actually punch through and get just one democrat to actually have to stand up and face justice like the rest of us.

You or I would have been thrown in jail just for shooting our mouth off at a judge the way she did.

Besides, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Only an idiot would "play fair" with an opponent now who has cheated their ass off, pulled all the lawfare they have for years on end against their every political opponent.

Can you link me to one time you cried about any of that?

 

[Marener]

Still having trouble with remedial reading I see.

Once again:

It is a given she's guilty. We both know she's guilty. All I'm advocating for is to keep trying until we actually punch through and get just one democrat to actually have to stand up and face justice like the rest of us.

You or I would have been thrown in jail just for shooting our mouth off at a judge the way she did.

Besides, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Only an idiot would "play fair" with an opponent now who has cheated their ass off, pulled all the lawfare they have for years on end against their every political opponent.

Can you link me to one time you cried about any of that?

What are you so sure she’s guilty of doing?

People don’t go to jail for “shooting their mouth off”.

 

[forkup]

Still having trouble with remedial reading I see.

Once again:

It is a given she's guilty. We both know she's guilty. All I'm advocating for is to keep trying until we actually punch through and get just one democrat to actually have to stand up and face justice like the rest of us.

You or I would have been thrown in jail just for shooting our mouth off at a judge the way she did.

Besides, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Only an idiot would "play fair" with an opponent now who has cheated their ass off, pulled all the lawfare they have for years on end against their every political opponent.

Can you link me to one time you cried about any of that?

I'm pretty sure that my reading comprehension skill are quite a bit better than yours. For instance I understand that if someone says, "Just keep suing her ass off until the is bankrupt then arrest her for vagrancy."

That person doesn't really care that a crime was committed. I understand that that person simply wants to use the criminal justice system to punish people regardless if a guilty verdict can be achieved.

I'm also smart enough to know that "we both know" is not an actual argument it's the fallacy known as alleged certainty.

 

[Concerned American]

Y'all are stupid. And unethical.

It's unlawful to use the legal system to harass someone yet here you are with your pom poms cheering these idiots on.

After nine years of your championing the harrassment of DJT, your complaints are stupid and unethical. If she violated the law, she needs to answer for it. Remember, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

 

[toobfreak]

That person doesn't really care that a crime was committed.

No, I KNOW that a crime was committed, maybe a couple of crimes and I can think of no one more deserving of prosecution than her, I just want the justice system to actually convict an ass like her just for once to show me that justice really works--- sometimes.

The fact that she isn't easily thrown in jail for her abuse of the legal system is shocking.

That you defend her while being OK with her weaponization of law against many others is even worse.

 

[Independent thinker]

We’ll add this to the ever expanding portfolio of DOJ actions that go nowhere.

Fact is, she committed the very same "crime" Trump was accused of. Were they both guilty or both innocent? We shouldn't have two tiered justice system.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Do you think Leticia spent?

Whatever. I was speaking of a normal court of law. In James case, it is probably a problem like in NYC or DC where you cannot get an honest jury which is not already 100% biased for anyone just because they are a democrat.

Just keep suing her ass off until the is bankrupt then arrest her for vagrancy.

This moron doesn’t know that Leticia James has spent zero dollars in her defense so far.
now. He also implies that the case is going nowhere on the merits, undermining the troll OP and the troll named Hafar, both of whom claim she’s going down for real this time.

 

[leftwinger]

They could get this dirty snake too. What a crock of BS they foistered on the Stain as they lapped it up with TDS.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Fact is, she committed the very same "crime" Trump was accused of. Were they both guilty or both innocent? We shouldn't have two tiered justice system.

Dependent Thinker has reached a verdict. All rise.

 

[forkup]

No, I KNOW that a crime was committed, maybe a couple of crimes and I can think of no one more deserving of prosecution than her, I just want the justice system to actually convict an ass like her just for once to show me that justice really works--- sometimes.

The fact that she isn't easily thrown in jail for her abuse of the legal system is shocking.

That you defend her while being OK with her weaponization of law against many others is even worse.

Oh "you know." I have to say, you are impressive. Not only do you know a crime was committed, this despite you not being a lawyer since you don't know how a grand jury works, and you admitting yourself that

Ordinary citizens know nothing of the law

But you even know what I know. Clairvoyant and a genius, truly impressive.

Let me, a mere mortal, ask you this then, since you know and all. What specific statute do you know James violated and what are the elements that a prosecutor need to prove in order to secure a conviction, and how do you know that what James did meets that burden of proof?

 

[toobfreak]

Do you think Leticia spent?
This moron doesn’t know that Leticia James has spent zero dollars in her defense so far.

Quit proving my point, jackass. Whoever is paying it all is still paying it. Let them keep paying it.

You keep bailing her out, buying off the prosecutor, buying off the jury and buying her freedom, and we'll keep dragging her back into the courtroom.

We have more courtrooms than you have money. How many millions (billions?) is Letitia really worth to you?

 

[toobfreak]

Oh "you know." I have to say, you are impressive.

That besides the point all one needs to do is follow the news.

this despite you not being a lawyer since you don't know how a grand jury works,

Moron, you don't have any idea what I am, what I have been, or what I know, so how can your opinion on the imagined innocence of that fat stuffed smug pig James possibly be worth reading?

It ain't.

She will be hounded till the end of time until she is convicted of something, just like she's done to so many others.

Democrats set the precedent now they will sleep in the bed they made.

 

[forkup]

That besides the point all one needs to do is follow the news.


Moron, you don't have any idea what I am, what I have been, or what I know, so how can your opinion on the imagined innocence of that fat stuffed smug pig James possibly be worth reading?

It ain't.

She will be hounded till the end of time until she is convicted of something, just like she's done to so many others.

Democrats set the precedent now they will sleep in the bed they made.

Well, I have a clear idea that you don't work in anything do to with the law. Since again, you asserted that a GJ would do what the government tells them. Not realizing that a GJ only has a prosecutor present. So yes I have an idea what you're not and base that on what you say.

I also know I asked you specific questions you are deflecting from, this again confirming you don't have a clue what you're talking about hen you claim to know anything.

You, my friend, are a chump. A chump who thinks if he just asserts something with enough conviction people will be fooled in mistaken your opinion for fact.

 

[toobfreak]

You, my friend, are a chump.

You are a jerk. Go suck Letitia's criminal ass. Your thoughts and assumptions aren't worth the spit they are made of.