Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

It clearly didn’t read Aileen Cannon’s decision and neither did you.
So what Google put on their page about Bondi appointing a special attorney is a lie? You're getting stretched out pretty thin here Mariner, and you look kind of stupid as well as corrupt . What you are doing is called gaslighting .
Screenshot_20250812-113647_Chrome.webp
 
So what Google put on their page about Bondi appointing a special attorney is a lie?
It’s not consistent with Aileen Cannon’s ruling. Is that an AI answer? You know it’s not reliable, right?
 
It’s not consistent with Aileen Cannon’s ruling. Is that an AI answer? You know it’s not reliable, right?
When did Eileen Cannon make a ruling about assigning a special attorney to Leticia James? Isn't that what we're talking about? Are you autistic? Is it financially profitable for you to support corruption in New York? So many questions so many refusals to answer. What a schmuck you are
 
When did Eileen Cannon make a ruling about assigning a special attorney to Leticia James? Isn't that what we're talking about? Are you autistic? Is it financially profitable for you to support corruption in New York? So many questions so many refusals to answer. What a schmuck you are
She found that the AG doesn’t have authority to appoint inferior officers because Congress never gave the authority to the AG.
 
She found that the AG doesn’t have authority to appoint inferior officers because Congress never gave the authority to the AG.
Jack Smith was not an inferior officer. Do you have autism?
 
She found that the AG doesn’t have authority to appoint inferior officers because Congress never gave the authority to the AG.
So Eileen Cannon went against the Constitution and Google is lying to us? Wow we really are in trouble if we listen to you you ******* moron.
 
So Eileen Cannon went against the Constitution and Google is lying to us? Wow we really are in trouble if we listen to you you ******* moron.
I must have missed where we decided that Google AI search result has more weight than a judicial decision.
 
Invented for stooges like yourself and it'll be overturned on appeal... the judge was corrupt , the prosecutor is corrupt, the whole thing is a joke but you keep clinging to that stupidity....fool
They're all against me, can't you see!!??



A three-judge panel overheard the arguments, which were scheduled to take about 20 minutes total and instead went over an hour, centered largely around the interpretation of a specific law that allows federal officials facing charges to move a case from state to federal court if the case involves conduct while in office. Trump's lawyers argue the law applies since evidence presented during the trial was from Trump's first term — even though the actual crime was committed in 2016, when Trump was still a candidate. In an unusual move, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief last month in support of the president's request.

The president was represented in court by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who also served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first term in office. Trump did not appear in court for the appeal.

"Everything about this cries out for a federal court room," Wall told the judges, arguing that testimony from former Trump officials during his first term like Hope Hicks made the case relevant to the president's official duties.

Steven Wu, the appeals chief for the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, argued that the reason behind the law in question was about selecting the proper forum for a trial to take place, not to move it after sentencing. "The point is not to divert a case into federal court during the appellate process," he said.

 
They're all against me, can't you see!!??



A three-judge panel overheard the arguments, which were scheduled to take about 20 minutes total and instead went over an hour, centered largely around the interpretation of a specific law that allows federal officials facing charges to move a case from state to federal court if the case involves conduct while in office. Trump's lawyers argue the law applies since evidence presented during the trial was from Trump's first term — even though the actual crime was committed in 2016, when Trump was still a candidate. In an unusual move, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief last month in support of the president's request.

The president was represented in court by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who also served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first term in office. Trump did not appear in court for the appeal.

"Everything about this cries out for a federal court room," Wall told the judges, arguing that testimony from former Trump officials during his first term like Hope Hicks made the case relevant to the president's official duties.

Steven Wu, the appeals chief for the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, argued that the reason behind the law in question was about selecting the proper forum for a trial to take place, not to move it after sentencing. "The point is not to divert a case into federal court during the appellate process," he said.


They even changed the law in New York because the statue of limitations are already ran out even though it was the totally fake made up crime with nobody was defrauded the bank's testified they would do business with Trump again the hell out of that stuff ....talking points boy... Leticia James is as corrupt as they come you should be disbarred and put Federal prison
 
They even changed the law in New York because the statue of limitations are already ran out even though it was the totally fake made up crime with nobody was defrauded the bank's testified they would do business with Trump again the hell out of that stuff ....talking points boy
You’re confused.
 
Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny.
You know there was a trial, right? With trump having every opportunity to defend himself. The jury weighed the evidence against trump's defense and voted to convict.

The appeal is based on trump claiming the case should be retroactively moved to a federal court based on the allowance that federal officers can request a trial in one. But he wasn't a federal officer when he committed the crimes he was convicted for. So the appeal is based on a long shot loophole, not his innocence.

BTW, do you know who Ed Martin is?

Two of the people familiar with the matter said that the new subpoenas were part of a broader investigation to determine whether the office had violated the rights of Mr. Trump or others. It is a highly unusual use of a civil rights law more typically used to investigate potential racial, religious or sex discrimination, among other categories.

On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi also appointed Ed Martin — the far-right former interim U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C. — as a special prosecutor to supervise an ongoing investigation into Ms. James’s real estate dealings, according to two people briefed on the move.

Ms. James’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, on Friday called the investigation related to the fraud case against Mr. Trump ā€œthe most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president’s political retribution campaign.ā€ He added that the appointment of Mr. Martin ā€œmakes it crystal clear this is a manufactured investigation to pursue political retribution.ā€


He's the guy who had his name withdrawn for a confirmation hearing to become a US Attorney because he's so batshyte crazy corrupt even Repub senators, who do just about everything trump tells them to do, would not support him. So Dotard put him in the DoJ.
 
Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals. :popcorn:

Theater for rubes
 
15th post
I must have missed where we decided that Google AI search result has more weight than a judicial decision.
Jack Smith and the special attorney appointed to look into Leticia James and Adam Schiff malfeasance are two different animals.( Say it With Me Now) a special attorney and a special prosecutor are two different things . They are covered differently in the Constitution and required different criteria .

comparing apples to oranges now, common deflective maneuver. Are you autistic? It would explain a lot. Come on fess up there's nothing really wrong with it. I have an autistic grandson he sharp as a tack and the love of my life. You know you can get help
 
Jack Smith and the special attorney appointed to look into Leticia James and Adam Schiff malfeasance are two different animals.( Say it With Me Now) a special attorney and a special prosecutor are two different things . They are covered differently in the Constitution and required different criteria .

comparing apples to oranges now, common deflective maneuver. Are you autistic? It would explain a lot. Come on fess up there's nothing really wrong with it. I have an autistic grandson he sharp as a tack and the love of my life. You know you can get help
You're wasting your time Moroner is an ignorant troll.
 
Back
Top Bottom