- Dec 16, 2017
- 23,027
- 12,463
- 1,290
That would likely make a LOT of Democrats more comfortable with him.
No...no it wouldnt. Trump could cure all the world's problems and the left would still hate him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would likely make a LOT of Democrats more comfortable with him.
Has everything to do with Trump. She wouldn’t be prosecuted if Trump didn’t demand it.I reported what was on her deed earlier. She faces fraud which you ignore. She is a criminal, and it has nothing to do with Trump.
This would never have been a federal case except for the vindictiveness of Trump.
No kidding, sounds like Justice to me.Has everything to do with Trump. She wouldn’t be prosecuted if Trump didn’t demand it.
That’s vindictive.
So you’re okay with Trump forcing the DoJ to prosecute his enemies?That my be true, but the root cause goes deeper. This would have never been a case against James had not had such a chip on her shoulder, charging Trump with a crime where there was no victim, seeking an excessive penalty, in a transparent attempt to damage him politically.
Like usual, the Dems accused others of things which they were actually and deliberately doing.
Serves her right.
Because you’re an authoritarian.No kidding, sounds like Justice to me.
You poor thing, always the victim.Because you’re an authoritarian.
So you’re okay with Trump forcing the DoJ to prosecute his enemies?
The indictment has nothing to do with that.
You have. I idea what you’re talking about.
POETIC JUSTICE FOR A BIGOTED WOMAN.Has everything to do with Trump. She wouldn’t be prosecuted if Trump didn’t demand it.
That’s vindictive.
She is reaping what she sowed.Because you’re an authoritarian.
That’s not justice at all. You’re angry and vindictive, like Trump.POETIC JUSTICE FOR A BIGOTED WOMAN.
And Trump is innocent? He inflated his net worth by hundreds of millions.She is reaping what she sowed.
I have no interest in her though you sure do.That’s not justice at all. You’re angry and vindictive, like Trump.
Hardly speculative. We have his not so private message. We saw him fire the US attorney who wouldn’t prosecute. We have the statements of others in his administration.That is completely speculative, but I am totally fine with James' property records being investigated. Someone probably tipped off the DOJ. It's often the case when one side makes charges that the other side then starts looking at the accuser's past to see if they are a flaming hypocrite. Glass houses and all that.
Clearly you do.I have no interest in her though you sure do.
stick to her being prosecuted. She is receiving what she did to others. This time the case is solid. she will be in prison.Hardly speculative. We have his not so private message. We saw him fire the US attorney who wouldn’t prosecute. We have the statements of others in his administration.
Should the next democratic administration dredge up the mortgage records of every prominent Republican? We can prosecute dozens of them with bank fraud and jail time.
I have no idea what you are referring to.Hardly speculative. We have his not so private message. We saw him fire the US attorney who wouldn’t prosecute. We have the statements of others in his administration.
Should the next democratic administration dredge up the mortgage records of every prominent Republican?
This time the case is solid. she will be in prison.
That’s not justice at all. You’re angry and vindictive, like Trump.