The value doesn’t matterTrump’s case was for hundreds of millions. The case against James is a few thousand.
The difference is that James lied to get better interest rates and tax rates
And Trump didn’t
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The value doesn’t matterTrump’s case was for hundreds of millions. The case against James is a few thousand.
Had she not lied and said her second home in Va was her primary residence she wouldn’t be under indictmentHas everything to do with Trump. She wouldn’t be prosecuted if Trump didn’t demand it.
That’s vindictive.
Um James literally campaigned on getting Trump and spent years digging through and making thing up to try and keep him from running for presidentHardly speculative. We have his not so private message. We saw him fire the US attorney who wouldn’t prosecute. We have the statements of others in his administration.
Should the next democratic administration dredge up the mortgage records of every prominent Republican? We can prosecute dozens of them with bank fraud and jail time.
She didn’t. The indictment said she got a mortgage as a secondary residence.Had she not lied and said her second home in Va was her primary residence she wouldn’t be under indictment
The grand jury disagrees. She liedShe didn’t. The indictment said she got a mortgage as a secondary residence.
Correct she did, but she claimed it was her primary on the mortgage applicationShe didn’t. The indictment said she got a mortgage as a secondary residence.
Marener and his fellow demafasict don’t care about what our justice system says. They make their own rulesThe grand jury disagrees. She lied
That’s not what the indictment said.Correct she did, but she claimed it was her primary on the mortgage application
That’s a crime
The grand jury disagrees with the indictment? That’s a problem with the prosecutor then.The grand jury disagrees. She lied
Well because it’s an indictment not evidence you idiotThat’s not what the indictment said.
So you think the crime is different than what is listed on the indictment?Well because it’s an indictment not evidence you idiot
The crime is what is the mortgage application says, where she claims that second residence is her primary one
Haha the indictment states the crime. She did not use it as a secondary residence like she said she was on the mortgage application. That lien was the crime. The indicment is clear and puts her on notice of her fraudulent criminal actsSo you think the crime is different than what is listed on the indictment?
So you’re contradicting yourself.Haha the indictment states the crime. She did not use it as a secondary residence like she said she was on the mortgage application. That lien was the crime. The indicment is clear and puts her on notice of her fraudulent criminal acts
she claimed it was her primary on the mortgage application
She did not use it as a secondary residence like she said she was on the mortgage application.
Nope. Sorry you have a hard time with these terms. You are once again out of your leagueSo you’re contradicting yourself.
Did she claim the property as a primary or secondary residence on the application?Nope. Sorry you have a hard time with these terms. You are once again out of your league
Rest the indictment. She claimed it as a secondary residence where she was to reside. She didn’t do that.Did she claim the property as a primary or secondary residence on the application?
You said she claimed it as a primary residence earlier.Rest the indictment. She claimed it as a secondary residence where she was to reside. She didn’t do that.
The grand jury indicted her its slam dunk all supported by documents. Shes toastThe grand jury disagrees with the indictment? That’s a problem with the prosecutor then.
Yes her primary secondary residence. Where she was suppose to live in and out of. She didn’t do that. She liedYou said she claimed it as a primary residence earlier.