Letitia James indicted

Trump’s case was for hundreds of millions. The case against James is a few thousand.
The value doesn’t matter

The difference is that James lied to get better interest rates and tax rates

And Trump didn’t
 
I only have one thig to say. Paybacks are a ***** baby
1760184870465.webp
 
Has everything to do with Trump. She wouldn’t be prosecuted if Trump didn’t demand it.

That’s vindictive.
Had she not lied and said her second home in Va was her primary residence she wouldn’t be under indictment
 
Hardly speculative. We have his not so private message. We saw him fire the US attorney who wouldn’t prosecute. We have the statements of others in his administration.

Should the next democratic administration dredge up the mortgage records of every prominent Republican? We can prosecute dozens of them with bank fraud and jail time.
Um James literally campaigned on getting Trump and spent years digging through and making thing up to try and keep him from running for president
 
Had she not lied and said her second home in Va was her primary residence she wouldn’t be under indictment
She didn’t. The indictment said she got a mortgage as a secondary residence.
 
She didn’t. The indictment said she got a mortgage as a secondary residence.
Correct she did, but she claimed it was her primary on the mortgage application

That’s a crime
 
That’s not what the indictment said.
Well because it’s an indictment not evidence you idiot

The crime is what is the mortgage application says, where she claims that second residence is her primary one
 
Well because it’s an indictment not evidence you idiot

The crime is what is the mortgage application says, where she claims that second residence is her primary one
So you think the crime is different than what is listed on the indictment?
 
So you think the crime is different than what is listed on the indictment?
Haha the indictment states the crime. She did not use it as a secondary residence like she said she was on the mortgage application. That lien was the crime. The indicment is clear and puts her on notice of her fraudulent criminal acts
 
Haha the indictment states the crime. She did not use it as a secondary residence like she said she was on the mortgage application. That lien was the crime. The indicment is clear and puts her on notice of her fraudulent criminal acts
So you’re contradicting yourself.

she claimed it was her primary on the mortgage application

She did not use it as a secondary residence like she said she was on the mortgage application.
 
Nope. Sorry you have a hard time with these terms. You are once again out of your league
Did she claim the property as a primary or secondary residence on the application?
 
15th post
Did she claim the property as a primary or secondary residence on the application?
Rest the indictment. She claimed it as a secondary residence where she was to reside. She didn’t do that.
 
Rest the indictment. She claimed it as a secondary residence where she was to reside. She didn’t do that.
You said she claimed it as a primary residence earlier.
 
You said she claimed it as a primary residence earlier.
Yes her primary secondary residence. Where she was suppose to live in and out of. She didn’t do that. She lied
 
Back
Top Bottom