Zone1 Let it be said that legalized abortion on demand cheapens/ devalues life.

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Bookmarked for future entertainment!

Morons must be easily entertained. Congress will not likely pass an unconstitutional law. There are too many lawyers in Congress.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Settled, you say.

Great.

So, that means you (anyone?) can completely explain how it is Constitutional for a child's rights and personhood to "begin" at conception in one State, at 12 weeks in some other State, not until live birth in a 3rd. . . etc.

Don't ******* dodge the question.

Just give us a full explanation on how that can possibly be "Constitutionally settled."

It is called federalism. You should have learned that in school, but apparently you were absent or sleeping.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

View attachment 1143768

WTF does that have to do with anything? Where did that post come from?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't disagree. . . But to do that while at the same time denying that an abortion kills a child and while claiming abortions are simply a matter of "choice" is fucktarded lunacy.

That is your opinion. Once again, you have to go with majority rule, which is the basis of our government.

 

[Chuz Life]

Once again, you have to go with majority rule, which is the basis of our government.

I’m never going to agree that "majority rule" is the basis of the U.S. government. Especially, for when it comes down to justice issues, like abortion.

The U.S. is a constitutional republic, not a pure democracy. Majority rule is limited and put in check by constitutional protections, checks and balances, and individual rights.

This fucktarded combative chip you have on your shoulder is making you less credible with every post.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I’m never going to agree that "majority rule" is the basis of the U.S. government. Especially, for when it comes down to justice issues, like abortion.

The U.S. is a constitutional republic, not a pure democracy. Majority rule is limited and put in check by constitutional protections, checks and balances, and individual rights.

This fucktarded combative chip you have on your shoulder is making you less credible with every post.

Well, except for the fact that SCOTUS rued that there are no Constitutional protections regarding abortion.

The only *********** ness here is your understanding of our system of government under our Constitution.

BTW, you just violated Zone 1 rules in your own thread! Reported.

 

[Chuz Life]

Well, except for the fact that SCOTUS rued that there are no Constitutional protections regarding abortion.

The only *********** ness here is your understanding of our system of government under our Constitution.

BTW, you just violated Zone 1 rules in your own thread! Reported.

Oh noooooos

The inhumanity!

I keep searching for ANYTHING from the SCOTUS that supports your claim and frankly, I'm finding a lot of stuff to refute your claim and nothing to support it.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/sybfp2QP8LQY93zqBrvZVlXOu

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Oh noooooos

The inhumanity!

I keep searching for ANYTHING from the SCOTUS that supports your claim and frankly, I'm finding a lot of stuff to refute your claim and nothing to support it.
View attachment 1143896

https://x.com/i/grok/share/sybfp2QP8LQY93zqBrvZVlXOu

Stop using AI BS!

That federal action is a Constitutional Amendment.

 

[Chuz Life]

Stop using AI BS!

That federal action is a Constitutional Amendment.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

View attachment 1143910

You apparently are getting dumber with each passing post! Do you have an IQ leak?

 

[Chuz Life]

You apparently are getting dumber with each passing post! Do you have an IQ leak?

No.
But, I do have a projection detector!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No.
But, I do have a projection detector!

Your projection detector would be pegged because you are present near it all the time.

 

[Chuz Life]

Your projection detector would be pegged because you are present near it all the time.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

View attachment 1143939

I don't care because your point is moot. You will not change the status quo, no matter what you think is possible.

 

[Chuz Life]

I don't care because your point is moot. You will not change the status quo, no matter what you think is possible.

Nobody needs to know why anyone else chooses to be ignorant and uncaring, here.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Nobody needs to know why anyone else chooses to be ignorant and uncaring, here.

You may very well care, but you definitely fall into the ignorant category, despite our best efforts to educate you.

 

[Chuz Life]

You may very well care, but you definitely fall into the ignorant category, despite our best efforts to educate you.

You have yet to post any links to support any of your claims.

I have supported all of my own with numerous references, and all you can do is whine about it. That and attack AI for exposing your weak exaggerations about the legal prospects.

Putting you on ignore now because it's obvious that you don't "care" about anything more than derailing this thread.

 

[Zincwarrior]

The issue has been settled. Simply move to a state where its restricted. Let the other states do as the voters in each state have decided.

Those states are now suing abortion legal states to impose their views

 

[Zincwarrior]

A reminder: this is the Clean Debate zone. Personal insults are verbotten.

 

[JoeB131]

I’m never going to agree that "majority rule" is the basis of the U.S. government. Especially, for when it comes down to justice issues, like abortion.

The U.S. is a constitutional republic, not a pure democracy. Majority rule is limited and put in check by constitutional protections, checks and balances, and individual rights.

This fucktarded combative chip you have on your shoulder is making you less credible with every post.

Except the Courts have never ruled that fetuses are people in relation to abortion.

We don't count fetuses on the Census.

We don't let people deduct their fetuses as dependents.

Fetuses aren't legally people.

But this is all "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin" bullshit.

The real problem you have is that if a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, she'll figure out a way to not be pregnant

So you would either have to have a dystopian police state like the Fictional Gilead.

Or you will have a law on the books that no one obeys and everyone ignores. (Which is pretty much what you had before Roe, which is why SCOTUS struck those laws down.)