Here is the REAL question I want you to answer is:
Give me ONE reason the government would tell the people of America, our allies and our enemies ANYTHING different than what is in the memo? Regardless of whether it is or isn't true, there is nothing to gain from portraying America as incompetent or worse, as some banana republic where it's leader was murdered by assassins STILL at large.
One reason the government wouldn't tell the rest of the world and the public that there is someone running around free who killed Kennedy? Pretty easy; only bullets found were tied
to the gun
that had Oswald's prints
that was found
In the building where Oswald worked.
Were they supposed to make something up to throw red meat to people for no reason? Stunningly brain-dead position you're digging for yourself. But if you need more shovels, I'll hand them over to you.
I think something is suspect too; I mean when I was in college all of the people who passed tests--get this--had the same answers that everyone else who passed the test did. Those who failed; didn't have the same answers I did. Real conspiracy man.
So you think all 14 (I think it was 14) are lying? Yes or no.
No, the overwhelming evidence that he did it GAVE it to me.
BUT, for Oswald to be the LONE assassin, the single bullet theory MUST work. It doesn't work. From a ballistic standpoint; the initial entry wound in the President's BACK is lower than the exit wound in the president throat. And it doesn't work neurologically. The only way Governor Connolly's reaction to his grave, massive, invasive and sudden wounds could be delayed, as the Warren Report claims is if Connolly was a quadriplegic or so heavily sedated that it would put him in a semi-comatose state. Ballistically, IF you can convince me that when one bullet passes through two individuals, the location of the initial entry wound is UNimportant, then please enlighten me to that 'logic'.
Well, if there was a 2nd assassin, now you're implicating someone destroyed evidence of a 2nd rifle being used??? Find the bullets from the 2nd weapon and you may have something.
As for the entry wounds and exit wounds and all of that; I think they may have either just straight up botched the autopsy or screwed it up due to meddling and political considerations (wanting an open casket). After all, he was dead already and they had the gunman in custody.
Again, strange how one disappears without a trace and Oswald basically runs the eliminator course from American Gladiators when he leaves his sniper's perch. The only thing that seemed to be missing was Nitro and ICE throwing balls at him as he ran over the balance beams.
You can't tool along on your 'mission' ignoring credible evidence I've provided and also be oblivious to simple reasoning parameters like
who, what, where, when, why.
WHEN...The 'memo' was written
BEFORE much of the evidence was assembled and deciphered.
WHAT...The 'memo' in the context of NOT having all the evidence assembled and deciphered, indicates
INTENT by high levels of government to create a unified narrative irregardless of any forthcoming evidence.
WHY...The credibility, integrity and security of that same government and those same government agencies would be drawn into question and chastised. Also, any questions, discrepancies or doubt would have set in motion a rash of Congressional inquiries and hearings that would bring that same government to a grinding halt. Anything Lyndon Johnson hoped to accomplish as president would be have been obstructed or halted.
IF you had listened to the taped White House conversation I provided you between LBJ and J Edgar Hoover on 11/29/63, you'd be aware that even one week after the assassination Hoover wasn't aware one of the bullets missed the limousine, struck a curb and injured a bystander. Hoover told Johnson 3 shots were fired, two hitting the President and one hitting the Governor.
WHO...If you had any knowledge of the personalities of Lyndon Johnson and J Edgar Hoover you'd be aware that their vision of the way forward on the Kennedy assassination had nothing to do with truth and everything to do with turf.
The Commission was NOT unified in support of the commission's findings and in particular, NOT in support of the single bullet theory.
Sen. Richard B. Russell, Sen. John Sherman Cooper, and Rep. Hale Boggs rejected the so-called single bullet theory. Russell was so incensed,he called President Johnson Sept. 18, 1964 to tell him about what had happened earlier that day at the final official meeting of what Russell called "that dang Warren Commission," of which he was a reluctant member. The recording confirms a well-established fact: Sen. Russell vehemently disagreed with the so-called single bullet theory, a key aspect of the Warren Commission's 1964 Report on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The recording also discloses an amazing fact previously unknown:
LBJ agreed with Russell that the single bullet theory was unworthy of belief.
You went right over the cliff of logic with your analysis of the President's wounds. You continue to ignore the laws of physics, forensics, ballistics and crime investigation. You can't MOVE wounds to support a theory and you can't make shit up, i.e. (wanting an open casket).
WHY...You continue to be totally oblivious of just how critical the single bullet theory IS to Oswald being the lone assassin. Burt Griffin, a member of the Warren Commission staff, bluntly phrased it: "To say that [JFK and Connally] were hit by separate bullets is synonymous with saying that there were two assassins."
Logic, critical thinking and problem solving are not your strong suit...your alphabet would start with Z...
the case would be thrown out as anyone with logic and common sense knows.lol.
