Lee Harvey Oswald...innocent

[Bfgrn]

The palm print on the rifle that killed JFK belongs to Oswald.
The picture of a person posiing with the rifle that killed JFK features Oswald.
The Dallas police officer who was killed after JFK was killed was killed by Oswald.
The fatal shots from the rifle that killed JFK came from the place where Oswald worked.
The Dallas police department placed Oswald in the building after the execution.

The evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza doesn't exist. As much evidence of a third, fourth, fiftieth or hundredth shooter exists as does evidence of a second shooter.

Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

Please keep up with your skadoodles and pointless videos like Terral does. The once palpable line between you and fringe idiocy is blurring more and more by the second.

WTF is going on candycorn. Are you a dishonest person or that confused? I posted 2 videos on this thread: both of the late Governor John Connally, where he says beyond a shadow of a doubt he was NOT hit by the same bullet that hit President Kennedy.

Everything else I posted is documented evidence from your beloved Warren Commission. You have avoided answering even simple and straight forward questions...

Why did the Warren Commission move the first wound?
How did Oswald move the TSBD bldg to the opposite side of Elm St for the fatal head shot?

In 1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) said this about the Warren Commission:

“It must be said that the FBI generally exhausted its resources in confirming its case against Oswald as the lone assassin, a case that Director J. Edgar Hoover, at least, seemed determined to make within 24 hours of the of the assassination.”

The HSCA concluded in its 1979 report that:

1. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.

2. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.

3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy.

 

[candycorn]

The palm print on the rifle that killed JFK belongs to Oswald.
The picture of a person posiing with the rifle that killed JFK features Oswald.
The Dallas police officer who was killed after JFK was killed was killed by Oswald.
The fatal shots from the rifle that killed JFK came from the place where Oswald worked.
The Dallas police department placed Oswald in the building after the execution.

The evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza doesn't exist. As much evidence of a third, fourth, fiftieth or hundredth shooter exists as does evidence of a second shooter.

Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

Please keep up with your skadoodles and pointless videos like Terral does. The once palpable line between you and fringe idiocy is blurring more and more by the second.

WTF is going on candycorn. Are you a dishonest person or that confused? I posted 2 videos on this thread: both of the late Governor John Connally, where he says beyond a shadow of a doubt he was NOT hit by the same bullet that hit President Kennedy.

Everything else I posted is documented evidence from your beloved Warren Commission. You have avoided answering even simple and straight forward questions...

Why did the Warren Commission move the first wound?
How did Oswald move the TSBD bldg to the opposite side of Elm St for the fatal head shot?

In 1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) said this about the Warren Commission:

“It must be said that the FBI generally exhausted its resources in confirming its case against Oswald as the lone assassin, a case that Director J. Edgar Hoover, at least, seemed determined to make within 24 hours of the of the assassination.”

The HSCA concluded in its 1979 report that:

1. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.

2. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.

3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy.

Good for them...in the meantime, eat this:

The palm print on the rifle that killed JFK belongs to Oswald.
The picture of a person posiing with the rifle that killed JFK features Oswald.
The Dallas police officer who was killed after JFK was killed was killed by Oswald.
The fatal shots from the rifle that killed JFK came from the place where Oswald worked.
The Dallas police department placed Oswald in the building after the execution.

The evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza doesn't exist. As much evidence of a third, fourth, fiftieth or hundredth shooter exists as does evidence of a second shooter.

Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

Please keep up with your skadoodles and pointless videos like Terral does. The once palpable line between you and fringe idiocy is blurring more and more by the second.

bon apetit (sp?)

Check Please

 

[Bfgrn]

The palm print on the rifle that killed JFK belongs to Oswald.
The picture of a person posiing with the rifle that killed JFK features Oswald.
The Dallas police officer who was killed after JFK was killed was killed by Oswald.
The fatal shots from the rifle that killed JFK came from the place where Oswald worked.
The Dallas police department placed Oswald in the building after the execution.

The evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza doesn't exist. As much evidence of a third, fourth, fiftieth or hundredth shooter exists as does evidence of a second shooter.

Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

Please keep up with your skadoodles and pointless videos like Terral does. The once palpable line between you and fringe idiocy is blurring more and more by the second.

WTF is going on candycorn. Are you a dishonest person or that confused? I posted 2 videos on this thread: both of the late Governor John Connally, where he says beyond a shadow of a doubt he was NOT hit by the same bullet that hit President Kennedy.

Everything else I posted is documented evidence from your beloved Warren Commission. You have avoided answering even simple and straight forward questions...

Why did the Warren Commission move the first wound?
How did Oswald move the TSBD bldg to the opposite side of Elm St for the fatal head shot?

In 1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) said this about the Warren Commission:

“It must be said that the FBI generally exhausted its resources in confirming its case against Oswald as the lone assassin, a case that Director J. Edgar Hoover, at least, seemed determined to make within 24 hours of the of the assassination.”

The HSCA concluded in its 1979 report that:

1. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.

2. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.

3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy.

Good for them...in the meantime, eat this:

The palm print on the rifle that killed JFK belongs to Oswald.
The picture of a person posiing with the rifle that killed JFK features Oswald.
The Dallas police officer who was killed after JFK was killed was killed by Oswald.
The fatal shots from the rifle that killed JFK came from the place where Oswald worked.
The Dallas police department placed Oswald in the building after the execution.

The evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza doesn't exist. As much evidence of a third, fourth, fiftieth or hundredth shooter exists as does evidence of a second shooter.

Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

Please keep up with your skadoodles and pointless videos like Terral does. The once palpable line between you and fringe idiocy is blurring more and more by the second.

bon apetit (sp?)

Check Please

Translation...

I said "you win" did I not?

BULLSHIT ALERT!!!!

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn. Don't use your own brain, it's too hard and risky to not conform to the state...Just keep chanting, over and over...

Anyone with as weak an intellect should be told what to think by the state. You'd be a perfect candidate for North Korean citizenship. The people there are oblivious automatons...

But you are right where you belong... in the obtuse MINORITY...

 

[candycorn]

WTF is going on candycorn. Are you a dishonest person or that confused? I posted 2 videos on this thread: both of the late Governor John Connally, where he says beyond a shadow of a doubt he was NOT hit by the same bullet that hit President Kennedy.

Everything else I posted is documented evidence from your beloved Warren Commission. You have avoided answering even simple and straight forward questions...

Why did the Warren Commission move the first wound?
How did Oswald move the TSBD bldg to the opposite side of Elm St for the fatal head shot?

In 1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) said this about the Warren Commission:

“It must be said that the FBI generally exhausted its resources in confirming its case against Oswald as the lone assassin, a case that Director J. Edgar Hoover, at least, seemed determined to make within 24 hours of the of the assassination.”

The HSCA concluded in its 1979 report that:

1. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.

2. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.

3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy.

Good for them...in the meantime, eat this:

The palm print on the rifle that killed JFK belongs to Oswald.
The picture of a person posiing with the rifle that killed JFK features Oswald.
The Dallas police officer who was killed after JFK was killed was killed by Oswald.
The fatal shots from the rifle that killed JFK came from the place where Oswald worked.
The Dallas police department placed Oswald in the building after the execution.

The evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza doesn't exist. As much evidence of a third, fourth, fiftieth or hundredth shooter exists as does evidence of a second shooter.

Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

Please keep up with your skadoodles and pointless videos like Terral does. The once palpable line between you and fringe idiocy is blurring more and more by the second.

bon apetit (sp?)

Check Please

Translation...

I said "you win" did I not?

BULLSHIT ALERT!!!!

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn. Don't use your own brain, it's too hard and risky to not conform to the state...Just keep chanting, over and over...

Anyone with as weak an intellect should be told what to think by the state. You'd be a perfect candidate for North Korean citizenship. The people there are oblivious automatons...

But you are right where you belong... in the obtuse MINORITY...

So you're saying the...

Palm print on the murder weapon is a fake?
Picture with Oswald holding the weapon is a fake?
His murdering of Officer Tippitt (sp?) didn't happen?
That he didn't work in the Texas School Book Depository in Dallass where the shots were fired from--where they found the weapon had the fake print and was featured in the fake photograph?

Please do elaborate on exactly how far 'round the bend you've gone. LOL.

I think Terral gives correspondence courses in how to properly sound like a nutjob; maybe you can get into the Spring Semester if you apply now.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

what i find funny about cornboy troll is he uses the good old reliable history channel as a source,the same source that shows the propaganda that 19 muslins and bin laden were behind the 9/11 attacks as his source,lol.funny that he should even mention it because before the history channel got bought out by murdock,they USED to be objective about the kennedy assassination.they USED to air a special once in a while every year that SLAMDUNKS the warren commissions report called THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY.lol.

that special slamdunks the warren commission in the fact you can see from photos they show,a gunmen firing behind the picket fence that witnesses also reported.thats why many witnesses ran towards the grassy knoll that you see in the zapruder film cause they were courageouly chasing after him.some were yelling at policemen-i saw a shooter behind the picket fence,you got to go get him.which they did try and chase after..so mush for the theory of the warren commission that oswald was the lone assassian.lol.with murdock now owning the history channel,you wont see that special again though.

 

[DiveCon]

what i find funny about cornboy troll is he uses the good old reliable history channel as a source,the same source that shows the propaganda that 19 muslins and bin laden were behind the 9/11 attacks as his source,lol.funny that he should even mention it because before the history channel got bought out by murdock,they USED to be objective about the kennedy assassination.they USED to air a special once in a while every year that SLAMDUNKS the warren commissions report called THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY.lol.

that special slamdunks the warren commission in the fact you can see from photos they show,a gunmen firing behind the picket fence that witnesses also reported.thats why many witnesses ran towards the grassy knoll that you see in the zapruder film cause they were courageouly chasing after him.some were yelling at policemen-i saw a shooter behind the picket fence,you got to go get him.which they did try and chase after..so mush for the theory of the warren commission that oswald was the lone assassian.lol.with murdock now owning the history channel,you wont see that special again though.

rimjob never fails to show how much of a dipshit he is

 

[candycorn]

what i find funny about cornboy troll is he uses the good old reliable history channel as a source,the same source that shows the propaganda that 19 muslins and bin laden were behind the 9/11 attacks as his source,lol.funny that he should even mention it because before the history channel got bought out by murdock,they USED to be objective about the kennedy assassination.they USED to air a special once in a while every year that SLAMDUNKS the warren commissions report called THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY.lol.

that special slamdunks the warren commission in the fact you can see from photos they show,a gunmen firing behind the picket fence that witnesses also reported.thats why many witnesses ran towards the grassy knoll that you see in the zapruder film cause they were courageouly chasing after him.some were yelling at policemen-i saw a shooter behind the picket fence,you got to go get him.which they did try and chase after..so mush for the theory of the warren commission that oswald was the lone assassian.lol.with murdock now owning the history channel,you wont see that special again though.

Airing and producing are two different things. As a responsible outlet of information, they can and should air conflicting view points. When they have original productions however, they pretty much destroy the theory that Oswald was not involved.

You're right, they did air that special a few times; much like they aired the special that showed Dr. (giggle) Griffin, Dylan Unsavory, and that other moron get their ass handed to them on every front on 9/11.

You're problem is (one of your many problems) is you think airing is endorsement; a total kanard (sp?).

 

[DiveCon]

what i find funny about cornboy troll is he uses the good old reliable history channel as a source,the same source that shows the propaganda that 19 muslins and bin laden were behind the 9/11 attacks as his source,lol.funny that he should even mention it because before the history channel got bought out by murdock,they USED to be objective about the kennedy assassination.they USED to air a special once in a while every year that SLAMDUNKS the warren commissions report called THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY.lol.

that special slamdunks the warren commission in the fact you can see from photos they show,a gunmen firing behind the picket fence that witnesses also reported.thats why many witnesses ran towards the grassy knoll that you see in the zapruder film cause they were courageouly chasing after him.some were yelling at policemen-i saw a shooter behind the picket fence,you got to go get him.which they did try and chase after..so mush for the theory of the warren commission that oswald was the lone assassian.lol.with murdock now owning the history channel,you wont see that special again though.

Airing and producing are two different things. As a responsible outlet of information, they can and should air conflicting view points. When they have original productions however, they pretty much destroy the theory that Oswald was not involved.

You're right, they did air that special a few times; much like they aired the special that showed Dr. (giggle) Griffin, Dylan Unsavory, and that other moron get their ass handed to them on every front on 9/11.

You're problem is (one of your many problems) is you think airing is endorsement; a total kanard (sp?).

yeah, when they were shown it was impossible for thermite to cut through a verticle beam they all hemmed and hawed about some "super thermite paint"

LOL
was quite comical

 

[Bfgrn]

Good for them...in the meantime, eat this:

The palm print on the rifle that killed JFK belongs to Oswald.
The picture of a person posiing with the rifle that killed JFK features Oswald.
The Dallas police officer who was killed after JFK was killed was killed by Oswald.
The fatal shots from the rifle that killed JFK came from the place where Oswald worked.
The Dallas police department placed Oswald in the building after the execution.

The evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza doesn't exist. As much evidence of a third, fourth, fiftieth or hundredth shooter exists as does evidence of a second shooter.

Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

Please keep up with your skadoodles and pointless videos like Terral does. The once palpable line between you and fringe idiocy is blurring more and more by the second.

bon apetit (sp?)

Check Please

Translation...

I said "you win" did I not?

BULLSHIT ALERT!!!!

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn. Don't use your own brain, it's too hard and risky to not conform to the state...Just keep chanting, over and over...

Anyone with as weak an intellect should be told what to think by the state. You'd be a perfect candidate for North Korean citizenship. The people there are oblivious automatons...

But you are right where you belong... in the obtuse MINORITY...

So you're saying the...

Palm print on the murder weapon is a fake?
Picture with Oswald holding the weapon is a fake?
His murdering of Officer Tippitt (sp?) didn't happen?
That he didn't work in the Texas School Book Depository in Dallass where the shots were fired from--where they found the weapon had the fake print and was featured in the fake photograph?

Please do elaborate on exactly how far 'round the bend you've gone. LOL.

I think Terral gives correspondence courses in how to properly sound like a nutjob; maybe you can get into the Spring Semester if you apply now.

No...that is not what I've said...

Why don't you tell me WHAT I have said? Give me a general outline.

 

[candycorn]

Translation...



BULLSHIT ALERT!!!!

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn. Don't use your own brain, it's too hard and risky to not conform to the state...Just keep chanting, over and over...

Anyone with as weak an intellect should be told what to think by the state. You'd be a perfect candidate for North Korean citizenship. The people there are oblivious automatons...

But you are right where you belong... in the obtuse MINORITY...

So you're saying the...

Palm print on the murder weapon is a fake?
Picture with Oswald holding the weapon is a fake?
His murdering of Officer Tippitt (sp?) didn't happen?
That he didn't work in the Texas School Book Depository in Dallass where the shots were fired from--where they found the weapon had the fake print and was featured in the fake photograph?

Please do elaborate on exactly how far 'round the bend you've gone. LOL.

I think Terral gives correspondence courses in how to properly sound like a nutjob; maybe you can get into the Spring Semester if you apply now.

No...that is not what I've said...

Why don't you tell me WHAT I have said? Give me a general outline.

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn.

I was told that the prints matched, the picture matched, the man killed Officer Tippitt, and that he worked in the TSBP where the shots were fired from in Dallass. If you have any information to the contrary, please bring it out terral err I mean brgn or whatever your name is.

 

[Bfgrn]

So you're saying the...

Palm print on the murder weapon is a fake?
Picture with Oswald holding the weapon is a fake?
His murdering of Officer Tippitt (sp?) didn't happen?
That he didn't work in the Texas School Book Depository in Dallass where the shots were fired from--where they found the weapon had the fake print and was featured in the fake photograph?

Please do elaborate on exactly how far 'round the bend you've gone. LOL.

I think Terral gives correspondence courses in how to properly sound like a nutjob; maybe you can get into the Spring Semester if you apply now.

No...that is not what I've said...

Why don't you tell me WHAT I have said? Give me a general outline.

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn.

I was told that the prints matched, the picture matched, the man killed Officer Tippitt, and that he worked in the TSBP where the shots were fired from in Dallass. If you have any information to the contrary, please bring it out terral err I mean brgn or whatever your name is.

Keep trying to paint me with that brush. The truth is YOU are much closer to the people you dismiss.

I asked you to tell me what I said. Are you unwilling or are you unable?

 

[candycorn]

I asked you to tell me what I said. Are you unwilling or are you unable?

Pay attention (here is what you said) :

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn.

Here is what I've been told:

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this? You can run as much as you want which is precisely what I expect you to do--keep splitting hairs and playing "what if" or "I think" or whining like a little twit that they didn't look for anybody else. Keep on dancing Shirley; we know what you are; a nutjob and you've earned the title time and again.

If you don't want to be thought of as a conspiracy whacko, you probably should stop acting precisely like every other conspiracy whackjob since the beginning of time. You're really climbing the ladder rapidly.


Check please.

 

[Bfgrn]

I asked you to tell me what I said. Are you unwilling or are you unable?

Pay attention (here is what you said) :

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn.

Here is what I've been told:

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this? You can run as much as you want which is precisely what I expect you to do--keep splitting hairs and playing "what if" or "I think" or whining like a little twit that they didn't look for anybody else. Keep on dancing Shirley; we know what you are; a nutjob and you've earned the title time and again.

If you don't want to be thought of as a conspiracy whacko, you probably should stop acting precisely like every other conspiracy whackjob since the beginning of time. You're really climbing the ladder rapidly.


Check please.

Your language, your constant insults and your use of hyperbole parrots the 'whackjobs' you are so obsessed with denigrating.

As I told you, I am not a conspiracy theorist. But I don't and I won't dismiss evidence in the murder of President Kennedy that is so blatantly misleading and ambiguous.

I told you I don't have a problem accepting Oswald as the lone assassin, BUT the evidence that I can see with my own two eyes doesn't point to that conclusion.

The fact that you are willing to ignore what IS blatantly misleading and ambiguous paints a picture of a person that is not intelligent, close-minded, dogmatic, a conformist and a devout statist that is only capable of parroting what the state tells him.

 

[candycorn]

I asked you to tell me what I said. Are you unwilling or are you unable?

Pay attention (here is what you said) :

You should stick with what you've been told candycorn.

Here is what I've been told:

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this? You can run as much as you want which is precisely what I expect you to do--keep splitting hairs and playing "what if" or "I think" or whining like a little twit that they didn't look for anybody else. Keep on dancing Shirley; we know what you are; a nutjob and you've earned the title time and again.

If you don't want to be thought of as a conspiracy whacko, you probably should stop acting precisely like every other conspiracy whackjob since the beginning of time. You're really climbing the ladder rapidly.


Check please.

Your language, your constant insults and your use of hyperbole parrots the 'whackjobs' you are so obsessed with denigrating.

As I told you, I am not a conspiracy theorist. But I don't and I won't dismiss evidence in the murder of President Kennedy that is so blatantly misleading and ambiguous.

I told you I don't have a problem accepting Oswald as the lone assassin, BUT the evidence that I can see with my own two eyes doesn't point to that conclusion.

The fact that you are willing to ignore what IS blatantly misleading and ambiguous paints a picture of a person that is not intelligent, close-minded, dogmatic, a conformist and a devout statist that is only capable of parroting what the state tells him.

Again...

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this?

 

[Bfgrn]

Pay attention (here is what you said) :




Here is what I've been told:

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this? You can run as much as you want which is precisely what I expect you to do--keep splitting hairs and playing "what if" or "I think" or whining like a little twit that they didn't look for anybody else. Keep on dancing Shirley; we know what you are; a nutjob and you've earned the title time and again.

If you don't want to be thought of as a conspiracy whacko, you probably should stop acting precisely like every other conspiracy whackjob since the beginning of time. You're really climbing the ladder rapidly.


Check please.

Your language, your constant insults and your use of hyperbole parrots the 'whackjobs' you are so obsessed with denigrating.

As I told you, I am not a conspiracy theorist. But I don't and I won't dismiss evidence in the murder of President Kennedy that is so blatantly misleading and ambiguous.

I told you I don't have a problem accepting Oswald as the lone assassin, BUT the evidence that I can see with my own two eyes doesn't point to that conclusion.

The fact that you are willing to ignore what IS blatantly misleading and ambiguous paints a picture of a person that is not intelligent, close-minded, dogmatic, a conformist and a devout statist that is only capable of parroting what the state tells him.

Again...

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this?

The 'evidence' you keep chanting is not enough to convict Oswald. It does not place him on the 6th floor at 12:25 CST and it does not place the weapon in his hand. It points to someone on the 6th floor firing at the motorcade. And most of all, it does not prove that person is the LONE assassin.

As a matter of FACT, a great deal of evidence points to the contrary. I tried to give you some key evidence that would create some doubt in your allegiance to the Warren Commission's findings.

If you had listened to any of the LBJ - J Edgar Hoover telephone conversations, you would have found out there was strong evidence Oswald was set up:

Less than 24 hours after the assassination of President Kennedy, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover reported to the new President Johnson on the state of the investigation. Noting that the evidence against [Oswald] is "not very very strong", Hoover reported on the tracing of the rifle to an alias of Oswald and other details implicating him in the shooting.

But when LBJ then asked "Have you established any more about the visit to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico in September," an event of no little interest to the inner circles of government, Hoover replied "No, that's one angle that's very confusing for this reason. We have up here the tape and the photograph of the man who was at the Soviet Embassy, using Oswald's name. The picture and the tape do not correspond to this man's voice, nor to his appearance. In other words, it appears that there is a second person who was at the Soviet Embassy down there." In other words, an imposter had implicated Oswald in a relationship with Soviet agents, less than two months before the assassination.
History Matters Archive - LBJ-Hoover 11-23-63

 

[candycorn]

Your language, your constant insults and your use of hyperbole parrots the 'whackjobs' you are so obsessed with denigrating.

As I told you, I am not a conspiracy theorist. But I don't and I won't dismiss evidence in the murder of President Kennedy that is so blatantly misleading and ambiguous.

I told you I don't have a problem accepting Oswald as the lone assassin, BUT the evidence that I can see with my own two eyes doesn't point to that conclusion.

The fact that you are willing to ignore what IS blatantly misleading and ambiguous paints a picture of a person that is not intelligent, close-minded, dogmatic, a conformist and a devout statist that is only capable of parroting what the state tells him.

Again...

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this?

The 'evidence' you keep chanting is not enough to convict Oswald.

On your planet, maybe not. On Earth and most planets in the Milky Way, there is more than enough evidnece to convict Oswald so badly his children would have been born guilty.

It does not place him on the 6th floor at 12:25 CST and it does not place the weapon in his hand. It points to someone on the 6th floor firing at the motorcade.

Someone who had the same exact palm print as Oswald.

And most of all, it does not prove that person is the LONE assassin.

Except there is zero evidence of a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or 50th gunman.

We've been over all of this before. If you've got evidence, file suit, bring it forward and take your chances with the courts. Both of us know why you won't; you'll get your head handed to you. Put up or shut up.

Check please.

 

[Bfgrn]

Again...

The palm print on the murder weapon was Oswald's.
The murder weapon was found in the TSBD; where Oswald worked.
Oswald killed a cop escaping from the swarm of police (sounds pretty innocent to me!!!).
There is a picture of Oswlad holding the murder weapon.

Do you have any information contrary to this?

The 'evidence' you keep chanting is not enough to convict Oswald.

On your planet, maybe not. On Earth and most planets in the Milky Way, there is more than enough evidnece to convict Oswald so badly his children would have been born guilty.

It does not place him on the 6th floor at 12:25 CST and it does not place the weapon in his hand. It points to someone on the 6th floor firing at the motorcade.

Someone who had the same exact palm print as Oswald.

And most of all, it does not prove that person is the LONE assassin.

Except there is zero evidence of a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or 50th gunman.

We've been over all of this before. If you've got evidence, file suit, bring it forward and take your chances with the courts. Both of us know why you won't; you'll get your head handed to you. Put up or shut up.

Check please.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEasB7IRZJs]YouTube - Dallas Police : Rifle had NO Fingerprints[/ame]

 

[candycorn]

The 'evidence' you keep chanting is not enough to convict Oswald.

On your planet, maybe not. On Earth and most planets in the Milky Way, there is more than enough evidnece to convict Oswald so badly his children would have been born guilty.


Someone who had the same exact palm print as Oswald.

And most of all, it does not prove that person is the LONE assassin.

Except there is zero evidence of a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or 50th gunman.

We've been over all of this before. If you've got evidence, file suit, bring it forward and take your chances with the courts. Both of us know why you won't; you'll get your head handed to you. Put up or shut up.

Check please.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEasB7IRZJs]YouTube - Dallas Police : Rifle had NO Fingerprints[/ame]

Latona testified that this palmprint was the right palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald.58 At the request of the Commission, Arthur Mandella, fingerprint expert with the New York City Police Department, conducted an independent examination and also determined that this was the right palmprint of Oswald.59 Latona's findings were also confirmed by Ronald G. Wittmus, another FBI fingerprint

From the Warren commission Report:

Chapter 4

Let me guess; they're all lying.

 

[candycorn]

On your planet, maybe not. On Earth and most planets in the Milky Way, there is more than enough evidnece to convict Oswald so badly his children would have been born guilty.


Someone who had the same exact palm print as Oswald.


Except there is zero evidence of a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or 50th gunman.

We've been over all of this before. If you've got evidence, file suit, bring it forward and take your chances with the courts. Both of us know why you won't; you'll get your head handed to you. Put up or shut up.

Check please.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEasB7IRZJs]YouTube - Dallas Police : Rifle had NO Fingerprints[/ame]

Latona testified that this palmprint was the right palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald.58 At the request of the Commission, Arthur Mandella, fingerprint expert with the New York City Police Department, conducted an independent examination and also determined that this was the right palmprint of Oswald.59 Latona's findings were also confirmed by Ronald G. Wittmus, another FBI fingerprint

From the Warren commission Report:

Chapter 4

Let me guess; they're all lying.

Nice retreat loser {{{{cabbagepatching}}}}}

 

[Bfgrn]

YouTube - Dallas Police : Rifle had NO Fingerprints

Latona testified that this palmprint was the right palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald.58 At the request of the Commission, Arthur Mandella, fingerprint expert with the New York City Police Department, conducted an independent examination and also determined that this was the right palmprint of Oswald.59 Latona's findings were also confirmed by Ronald G. Wittmus, another FBI fingerprint

From the Warren commission Report:

Chapter 4

Let me guess; they're all lying.

Nice retreat loser {{{{cabbagepatching}}}}}

I gave you plenty of evidence that you wouldn't or couldn't address. You ignored it, ran and hid, and then you QUIT...I didn't try to belittle you...

BTW. I already KNOW what the Warren Commission said. But you are unable to explain ANY of the discrepancies. You won't even listen to what 2 subsequent government investigations concluded...

You really turned out to be an asshole...