Leading Climate Scientist, Dr Peiser, "we Should All Be Relieved That It Isn’t Such A Big Problem A

[skookerasbil]

The Unibomber also declared he was "winning". So that's another similarity between the Unibomber and skook/jc. It's not just the writing style; it's the paranoid megalomania.

w0w............impressive post.

Thats right............Im a paranoid meglomania.......but WiNnInG

 

[skookerasbil]

annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false?

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false?

Please answer honestly...
Click to expand...

I dont care.............and neither does anybody else.

Nothing matters with this shit unless the policy makers give a ****. They dont. Fossil fuels march on s0n.....unabated. The US will be the largest exproter of crude by years end. Natural gas is BOOMING ( shit....the roads in Suffolk Co. on Long Island here are being torn up to shit to build new gas line mains......travel/traffic here blows). Germany is importing coal at record levels in 2014 ( and 20 new coal plants to be built by 2020 ). Solar power is 0.2% of our energy now and maximum projections have renewables at 10% by 2050!!! ( Obama's EIA projections, not mine!! ). Go check a projection of use of coal by China in the next 30 years s0n!!!

Nobody cares what I think about about a "consensus"......only you dolts continue to be duped!!! But continue the nuttiness please..........this forum would suck balls without it.


After 25+ years of bomb throwing and deliberating about temperatures........the AGW crowd has barely moved the goalposts a smidge.


Thats called lOsInG



s0n......you can build the most beautiful car in the world, but if you dont put wheels on it, it isnt worth dick












Pardon........but thought the above post was outstanding to the point of being surreal, thus, a repost was in order.

Its outstanding because it cannot be refuted!!!

 

[jc456]

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

 

[Bfgrn]

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

 

[Youch]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."





Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

 

[skookerasbil]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."





Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

 

[Bfgrn]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."





Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

 

[skookerasbil]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."





Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

Yeah.....but "what if's" and conjecture are gay s0n!!! That's why there are millions of bumper stickers in the US about the far left Disney dwellers being mental cases.


The "pea brain deniers" are wInNing!!! Well......at least the Obama EIA thinks so!!!



[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/8abb9baf6-3.jpg.html][/URL]



Anyway.......the Gallup poll posted above tells the whole story. Nobody cares about global warming except the AGW obsessed. Too......young people don't know shit about shit about the real world. Ask any parent. Young people.......you can sell them a bag of dog doo for $1,000 a pop if its packaged up just right. When they get older and have to pay the energy bills and balance their budget, they realize how stoopid green energy is. Because to them......costs matter. They don't matter to the AGW nuts.[/URL][/URL]

 

[jc456]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."




Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

So what is your version of free market?

 

[Youch]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."





Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

QUOTE]

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

Comparing me to Sowell? A greater compliment has never been given to me on a public forum.

Sowell is a brilliant man. Refute him if you can. (you can't, of course).

 

[mamooth]

So, like Sowell, do you think Obama is just like Hitler?

Do you think the US is in danger of having to surrender to Iran?

Were you a big backer of starting a war in Iraq?

Do you think DDT is harmless, and that banning it killed millions?

Do you think the New Deal made the depression worse?

Do you favor the gold standard?

Sowell did or believes all of the above crazy things. He's a barking loon, which guarantees that the paste-eating wing of the libertarians will worship him.

 

[jc456]

So, like Sowell, do you think Obama is just like Hitler?

Do you think the US is in danger of having to surrender to Iran?

Were you a big backer of starting a war in Iraq?

Do you think DDT is harmless, and that banning it killed millions?

Do you think the New Deal made the depression worse?

Do you favor the gold standard?

Sowell did or believes all of the above crazy things. He's a barking loon, which guarantees that the paste-eating wing of the libertarians will worship him.

 

[skookerasbil]

So, like Sowell, do you think Obama is just like Hitler?

Do you think the US is in danger of having to surrender to Iran?

Were you a big backer of starting a war in Iraq?

Do you think DDT is harmless, and that banning it killed millions?

Do you think the New Deal made the depression worse?

Do you favor the gold standard?

Sowell did or believes all of the above crazy things. He's a barking loon, which guarantees that the paste-eating wing of the libertarians will worship him.

He says, "There are 3 questions which when the far left person tries to answer, their argument falls apart.........."

1) At what cost?

2) As compared to what?

3) What hard evidence do you have?


And we certainly have proved that in here, have we not?

I have asked numerous times for any of the AGW k00ks to present one single link that shows us that their stuff is mattering in the real world. Asked it two years ago.......not a single response. Because all of their arguments get smashed to shit when they have to answer any of the above questions as they relate to AGW having any significant impact in the real world.

Its been a hobby. Its a hobby now. It'll be a hobby 10 years from now. That's ALL it is.

 

[skookerasbil]

1) At what cost? ( we hear about banning fossil fuels for the planet....to stop warming.......nobody is listening )

2) As compared to what? ( we hear about solar and wind......but after 20 years, its a sliver of the energy market......because
nations cant go green or their asses get thrown out )

3) What hard evidence do you have? ( ummm......that would be zero. No hard evidence.....only speculation based upon
computer models known to be notoriously faulty )

 

[Bfgrn]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."





Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

k00k!!!!!!

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

Comparing me to Sowell? A greater compliment has never been given to me on a public forum.

Sowell is a brilliant man. Refute him if you can. (you can't, of course).

Sowell is not a brilliant man. He is a lightweight who will always contort his story to please his handlers. He is incapable of critical thought.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Dr Benny Peiser says public are more sceptical about climate change and global warming Nature News Daily Express

One word = Ooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

So......here you have a world renowned climate science expert stating that the AGW community has been exaggerating the threat posed by global warming.

He goes on to say,

"Something is clearly balancing out the warming effect of the CO2 [carbon dioxide]," he explained.
"It might be natural factors, it might be the ocean, no one knows for sure.
"It [the warming] could start anytime - and that is an indication that we don’t fully understand the climate.
"That’s a reality that most climate scientists are reluctant to admit."





Like Ive been saying forever........we got a lot of phonies in this forum.

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

These people are missing a filter JC......like most far left guys. Dollar to a thousand stale donuts that if we have had a USMB ENVIRONMENT FORUM gathering, these people would strike you immediately as being profound social oddballs. WHen you are being publically humiliated and have no clue about it, thats a problem.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

Comparing me to Sowell? A greater compliment has never been given to me on a public forum.

Sowell is a brilliant man. Refute him if you can. (you can't, of course).

Sowell is not a brilliant man. He is a lightweight who will always contort his story to please his handlers. He is incapable of critical thought.

IF he is such a light weight why do you and your ilk refuse to answer simple questions that the man asks?

 

[Bfgrn]

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

Comparing me to Sowell? A greater compliment has never been given to me on a public forum.

Sowell is a brilliant man. Refute him if you can. (you can't, of course).

Sowell is not a brilliant man. He is a lightweight who will always contort his story to please his handlers. He is incapable of critical thought.

IF he is such a light weight why do you and your ilk refuse to answer simple questions that the man asks?

Like what?

 

[skookerasbil]

Yes, the counter-balance is cyclical cooling.

“You know, I’ve spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks”
William F. Buckley Jr.

I don't have to humiliate you k00k, you are an expert at humiliating yourself.

So your answers are...TRUE!...TRUE!!...TRUE!!!

Let's recap:

Bfgrn:
I'm a reasonable man; a pragmatist. And as an opened minded liberal, I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But let's be clear skookerasbil...CRYSTAL... Your position is that 97.2 percent of the scientists who endorse the "consensus" that global warming is human caused are all a bunch of k00ks.

True or false? TRUE!

Your belief is the only people who have any credibility about climate change just happen to also be financed by huge corporations and mining cartels who make billions of dollars annually polluting our environment and benefit financially by anything that delays action to stop or regulate that activity.

True or false? TRUE!!

And that a large amount of the 'science' and strategy you support can be traced back to the very same 'science' and strategy big tobacco used to deny smoking causes cancer.

True or false? TRUE!!!


"Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. She seldom has received much aid from the power of great men to whom she is rarely known & seldom welcome. She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men. Error indeed has often prevailed by the assistance of power or force. Truth is the proper & sufficient antagonist to error.
Thomas Jefferson

Well, take a bow s0n......you've answered your own questions with "true". Ive noticed the far left are the only board members who pull such a gay stunt. Like all far left k00ks......their heads explode when they see a post that provides a sobering nut sack kick.....in this case, the sobering reality that 20+ years of throwing bombs on climate change has netted them dick.

You missed a memo somewhere along the way s0n......the people prefer cheap energy, not expensive energy. If the pols provide them with expensive energy that is unreliable, the pols are out. That's the way it works in the real world. That the way it will always work. When wind and solar can compete in the energy market without massive government subsidies, the AGW climate crusaders might actually matter in the real world. The other memo the climate crusader assholes missed is that there are special interests attached to green energy........lots of people making big bucks off of green energy and these dolts think green energy is some altruistic business entity.

Lastly......when you see people on the far left talking abut "polluting our environment".......if you have half a brain, you realize you are looking at the rantings of what has become known as human racism = the earth is more important than humans so **** them!!! The thinking is decidedly fringe. And anyway......the canned crap about "big oil and huge corporations perpetuating the fossil fuel industry"? Everybody and their brother has known about that for a long time now........and nobody cares. They like their fossil fuels because they ( but not the k00ks ) know "costs" matter in life.


Most people can think on the margin, unlike people on the far left. As Sowell points out here, there are 2 questions that those on the far left never care to answer. They are, 1) At what cost?......2) As compared to what?



To the majority, those are important questions to be answered no matter what you are talking about. But not to the far left k00ks.

It is truly amazing how really, really stupid you are. You and Sowell's picture would be next to the definition of 'marginal thinking'

FACT: dirty energy would die in an instant without the massive subsidies that absorb their costs. WHY? Because if those industries had to internalize their costs, and not just their profits, it would be clear even to morons like you that dirty energy is the MOST costly form of energy. And pea brains like you who continue to defend the cartels are clueless about the externalization of cost they desperately spend billions to defend.

The answer is a TRUE free market. Morons like you and Sowell have NO idea what that even looks like.

This is not about 'save the earth'....news flash: the earth is not going anywhere. The earth will survive no matter what human beings do. If a massive nuclear war broke out today killing all human, plants and animals, the 'earth would continue.

It IS about keeping in place the narrow set of earth properties that allows human life to continue.

Hey pea brain, take a good hard look at the coming 'majority'...

Comparing me to Sowell? A greater compliment has never been given to me on a public forum.

Sowell is a brilliant man. Refute him if you can. (you can't, of course).

Sowell is not a brilliant man. He is a lightweight who will always contort his story to please his handlers. He is incapable of critical thought.

IF he is such a light weight why do you and your ilk refuse to answer simple questions that the man asks?

cAnT

 

[Crick]

I imagine this was brought out long ago, but Dr Peiser is a social anthropologist, not a climate scientist.