bigrebnc1775
][][][% NC Sheepdog
LiarThat, of course, is a lie, LIAR.
BUT...
OK.
Once again we'll deal with your stupid.
What are the design specifications of firearms that prevent their illegal usage?
Fetch Ubu. Fetch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LiarThat, of course, is a lie, LIAR.
BUT...
OK.
Once again we'll deal with your stupid.
What are the design specifications of firearms that prevent their illegal usage?
Fetch Ubu. Fetch.
There have been some guns made that respond only to the actual owner. But this guy is really very upset and not in control of his wits.No I have not nor have I seen anyone else make that claim you lying hack.
They are designed to be used legallyI'm not making the claim that there are any design functions to prevent illegal use.
That's you and your clones.
Try reading, fool.No I have not nor have I seen anyone else make that claim you lying hack.
you keep proven just how ******* stupid you are with each post you make. Remind us how a bayonet is not a weapon of war again. Or how a sword is not a weapon of war. There are several lines of specific knives DESIGNED for combat operations and use.So you were told underwear is a combat implement?
Given the smell I can understand their error but chemical warfare is illegal.
No it isnt all there is is your ignorant rant about features not present on any item that is manufactured.Try reading, fool.
It's all over the thread.
RetiredGySgt Bob BlaylockThey are designed to be used legally
If they are used illegally then it's the shooter to be held accountable.
that doesnt say anything about a design to prevent illegal use retard.RetiredGySgt Bob Blaylock
When you fools are lying about who's saying firearms have some design capability that prevents their being used illegally remember...
The STUPID comes from you.
One more time they are designed to be used legallyRetiredGySgt Bob Blaylock
When you fools are lying about who's saying firearms have some design capability that prevents their being used illegally remember...
The STUPID comes from you.
Correct that dumbass believes they were designed to be used illegallythat doesnt say anything about a design to prevent illegal use retard.
and...another thread derailed by a liberal moron.Sit Ubu, sit.
View attachment 841252
Underwear is your topic. Notice I never mentioned underwear in the post you responded to.So you were told underwear is a combat implement?
Given the smell I can understand their error but chemical warfare is illegal.
Obviously you don't understand the term "design function"
You haven't the intellect required to participate in this thread.
You disagreed when I said cars were designed to be used legally. So that must mean you believe they are designed to be used illegally.
Attaching a knife to a gun doesn't make the knife a combat implement anymore than a soldier wearing underwear makes underwear a combat implement.
A little less stupid might help.
I'm not making the claim that there are any design functions to prevent illegal use.
That's you and your clones.
right now at this point in time Prosecutors across all political lines eliminate firearms charges in plea deals. and Judges dont give firearms offenses serious time even when brought forward.There are abuses of firearms and there should then be full prosecution of those who do such abuse, with maximum penalty. But weapons can be for situations of self defense, without such those who would attack them would be better armed, the choice of any to not have their attacker be better armed is reasonable, such right to choose should not be infringed.
2A/ RTKBA is not just about ( Hunting ) ( Self Protection ) ( Hobbyist ) ( 3 Gun Competition ) ( Trap / Skeet ) ( Collecting / Building ) …There are abuses of firearms and there should then be full prosecution of those who do such abuse, with maximum penalty. But weapons can be for situations of self defense, without such those who would attack them would be better armed, the choice of any to not have their attacker be better armed is reasonable, such right to choose should not be infringed.