Lawsuits against the companies that make assault rifles.

[Dadoalex]

Self accountability is the only safe guard needed.

So you "used legally" design is both a lie and stupid.

There ya go Ubu.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Really?

Let us discuss this stupid premise.

What safeguards are included in a bottle of whiskey that prevents:

An underage drinker
Drinking and driving
Public drunk?

None you say?

So much for your stupid premise.

there are no safeguards for any product to prevent an individual from using it illegally you retard,

 

[badbob85037]

I'm fascinated by this. I'm not anti-guns. I'm not Kneejerk against all gun control proposals. I'm fascinated by the legal issue(s) here. This isn't really about the 2nd Amendment 'right'. The article is speaking to the responsibilities that come with freedom and commerce. This is a huge issue now regarding holding gun makers accountable.

I'm going to "

Listen to This Article​

Download New York Times Audio
Listen to this story in the New York Times Audio app on iOS.

Gun Makers and Mass Shootings

The Lawyer Trying to Hold Gunmakers Responsible for Mass Shootings

Josh Koskoff’s legal victory against Remington has raised the possibility of a new form of gun control: lawsuits against the companies that make assault rifles.

www.nytimes.com

As you should be able to sue a car maker? One of those super gun owners I heard is arming his whole neighborhood and is known to hang out with pinkos and other colors and they're pissed off with this attack on another freedom while you do nothing. Bet you are the type of guy who gives up freedom as long as it doesn't affect you. The type of guy that goes to town, gets two BJ's, comes home, and gives his roomy both of them.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So you "used legally" design is both a lie and stupid.

There ya go Ubu.

Nope you for some reason believe they were designed to be used illegally.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Never said that Ubu.
The claim is both a lie and stupid.
But coming from you what else do we expect?

Yes you did insinuate it numbnuts. You're arguing against the suggestion that cars and firearms were designed to be used legally. Which means you are saying they are designed to be used illegally

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Not my claim supertard.
But given your single digit IQ and micrometer measured penis your stupidity and fixation on your glock as a replacement for your tiny cock, is not surprising.

then you have no point when you claim there are no safeguards for firearms to prevent illegal use dumbass.

 

[Auld Phart]

No, you use analogies that are wholly irrelevant.

ironic

 

[Robert W]

The topic isn't "assault rifles."

Is there a reason you're trying to derail this thread?

Change the title then.

 

[Robert W]

What safeguards are included with a firearm that precludes its illegal use?
None you say?

So much for this bit of stupid.

So who broke the law? The Rifle or the human?

 

[Robert W]

YOU just wasted a post accusing me of doing what you just did.

Well, I asked a question. You did not.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'm not blaming anything.
Your "guns are designed to be used legally" is just stupid.

Knives and hammers are not "combat" implements just like firearms are not for drilling holes or pounding nails.

The thread is about suing manufacturers for producing a product whose sole design purpose is to kill.

Thus far no one here has successfully disputed that premise.

Oh, you poor ignorant fool!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Oh, you poor ignorant fool!
View attachment 841212

View attachment 841210

View attachment 841211

Google Image Result for https://mb.cision.com/Public/19475/3337953/b5dd8742c35dd998_800x800ar.png

 

[bigrebnc1775]

 

[Dadoalex]

Yes you did insinuate it numbnuts. You're arguing against the suggestion that cars and firearms were designed to be used legally. Which means you are saying they are designed to be used illegally

That, of course, is a lie, LIAR.
BUT...

OK.
Once again we'll deal with your stupid.

What are the design specifications of firearms that prevent their illegal usage?

Fetch Ubu. Fetch.

 

[Dadoalex]

then you have no point when you claim there are no safeguards for firearms to prevent illegal use dumbass.

Please list the the features that prevent a firearm from being used illegally from the design documents.


God you people are stupid.

 

[Dadoalex]

Oh, you poor ignorant fool!
View attachment 841212

View attachment 841210

View attachment 841211

Attaching a knife to a gun doesn't make the knife a combat implement anymore than a soldier wearing underwear makes underwear a combat implement.

A little less stupid might help.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

That, of course, is a lie, LIAR.
BUT...

OK.
Once again we'll deal with your stupid.

What are the design specifications of firearms that prevent their illegal usage?

Fetch Ubu. Fetch.

what are the design features of ANY item that prevent its illegal use? There are none retard on anything.

 

[Dadoalex]

what are the design features of ANY item that prevent its illegal use? There are none retard on anything.

I'm not making the claim that there are any design functions to prevent illegal use.
That's you and your clones.

 

[Robert W]

Attaching a knife to a gun doesn't make the knife a combat implement anymore than a soldier wearing underwear makes underwear a combat implement.

A little less stupid might help.

That is not what the Army told us when being Trained. Where were you raised. Idiotville?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I'm not making the claim that there are any design functions to prevent illegal use.
That's you and your clones.

No I have not nor have I seen anyone else make that claim you lying hack.