Laws Regarding Classified Documents

[Independent thinker]

Oh, wait a minute. Now this is interesting. Lawmakers now want to pass laws regarding classified documents because current laws are "vague and toothless".


"While the Department of Justice and President Trump’s lawyers battle in Florida courtrooms over how the former president handled records from his White House, a group of advocates and members of Congress is working to fix the obscure 1970s law they say let the behavior go unchecked.

Critics say the “outdated, vague and toothless,” law needs to change"

Trump's handling of documents proves 'toothless' records law needs a jolt, critics say

Richard Nixon’s Watergate saga led to the Presidential Records Act. Donald Trump’s handling of documents has sparked calls to strengthen the law.

www.usatoday.com

So, once again, they are going after Trump over VAGUE AND TOOTHLESS laws currently on the books. Translation: They can't indict Trump over vague and toothless laws but Biden's "Independent" DOJ wants to put him through the ringer anyway for political purposes, just before the midterms. Kind of reminds you of Congress wanting to pass fixes to the Electoral Vote Act because that law was also vaguely worded.

The above link is from USA Today, not Fox News.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The corrupt Democrats want new laws to break because they have broken all of the old ones.

 

[mudwhistle]

The corrupt Democrats want new laws to break because they have broken all of the old ones.

They make false claims about their opponents breaking the law....and then they try to change the law (after the fact) to conform to their false claims.

 

[BS Filter]

A bunch of democrat Trump haters around here have the goofy notion that their opinions are the law. I love coffee table lawyers. Very entertaining.

 

[Independent thinker]

A bunch of democrat Trump haters around here have the goofy notion that their opinions are the law. I love coffee table lawyers. Very entertaining.

This is exactly what they think of the Supreme Court. The hell with the Constitution, it is their opinions that count. Cases should be decided, not by the Constitution, but with a popular vote, similar to lynch mobs of the old west. Screw the law, let's be judge, jury, and executioner. If the vote is to hang then we hang, no trial needed if the person is guilty.

 

[BS Filter]

This is exactly what they think of the Supreme Court. The hell with the Constitution, it is their opinions that count. Cases should be decided, not by the Constitution, but with a popular vote, similar to lynch mobs of the old west. Screw the law, let's be judge, jury, and executioner. If the vote is to hang then we hang, no trial needed if the person is guilty.

Yep, and then they get on their soapbox and lecture us about democracy. Funny little creatures.

 

[g5000]

Oh, wait a minute. Now this is interesting. Lawmakers now want to pass laws regarding classified documents because current laws are "vague and toothless".


"While the Department of Justice and President Trump’s lawyers battle in Florida courtrooms over how the former president handled records from his White House, a group of advocates and members of Congress is working to fix the obscure 1970s law they say let the behavior go unchecked.

Critics say the “outdated, vague and toothless,” law needs to change"

Trump's handling of documents proves 'toothless' records law needs a jolt, critics say

Richard Nixon’s Watergate saga led to the Presidential Records Act. Donald Trump’s handling of documents has sparked calls to strengthen the law.

www.usatoday.com

So, once again, they are going after Trump over VAGUE AND TOOTHLESS laws currently on the books. Translation: They can't indict Trump over vague and toothless laws but Biden's "Independent" DOJ wants to put him through the ringer anyway for political purposes, just before the midterms. Kind of reminds you of Congress wanting to pass fixes to the Electoral Vote Act because that law was also vaguely worded.

The above link is from USA Today, not Fox News.

Trump was asked several times to turn over any and all classified documents he possessed. He said he had.

He lied.

The end.

 

[BS Filter]

Trump was asked several times to turn over any and all classified documents he possessed. He said he had.

He lied.

The end.

Yeah, we should all just give the federal government whatever they demand, huh.

 

[g5000]

Yeah, we should all just give the federal government whatever they demand, huh.

If it involves highly classified documents, yes, dumbass.

 

[BlindBoo]

Yeah, we should all just give the federal government whatever they demand, huh.

"If you got a warrant I guess you're gonna come in"

 

[BS Filter]

If it involves highly classified documents, yes, dumbass.

What if the "highly classified documents" were declassified by President Trump the day before he left office? Cocksucker.

 

[BS Filter]

"If you got a warrant I guess you're gonna come in"

That's pretty funny. Referring to a song by an anti-establishment rock group in support of big overbearing government. Confused much?

 

[Independent thinker]

Trump was asked several times to turn over any and all classified documents he possessed. He said he had.

He lied.

The end.

Not the end. Either it is illegal to have these things or it is not. You can't decide that a year ago it was legal and not press charges and yet now, just before the midterms, all of a sudden you decide it is illegal when it wasn't illegal a year ago and it wasn't illegal when Hillary did it.

 

[alang1216]

What if the "highly classified documents" were declassified by President Trump the day before he left office? Cocksucker.

You'd think he would have made that claim by now.

 

[BS Filter]

You'd think he would have made that claim by now.

He has. You're not informed.

 

[alang1216]

Oh, wait a minute. Now this is interesting. Lawmakers now want to pass laws regarding classified documents because current laws are "vague and toothless".


"While the Department of Justice and President Trump’s lawyers battle in Florida courtrooms over how the former president handled records from his White House, a group of advocates and members of Congress is working to fix the obscure 1970s law they say let the behavior go unchecked.

Critics say the “outdated, vague and toothless,” law needs to change"

Trump's handling of documents proves 'toothless' records law needs a jolt, critics say

Richard Nixon’s Watergate saga led to the Presidential Records Act. Donald Trump’s handling of documents has sparked calls to strengthen the law.

www.usatoday.com

So, once again, they are going after Trump over VAGUE AND TOOTHLESS laws currently on the books. Translation: They can't indict Trump over vague and toothless laws but Biden's "Independent" DOJ wants to put him through the ringer anyway for political purposes, just before the midterms. Kind of reminds you of Congress wanting to pass fixes to the Electoral Vote Act because that law was also vaguely worded.

The above link is from USA Today, not Fox News.

I think it is more the case that no one could anticipate the actions of a former President might jeopardize national security. Trump is always breaking new ground and the law is playing catchup.

 

[BlindBoo]

That's pretty funny. Referring to a song by an anti-establishment rock group in support of big overbearing government. Confused much?

I'm not confused at all on that line, that song or that group.

 

[alang1216]

He has. You're not informed.

An assertion that his attorneys have avoided making in the litigation around the FBI's seizure of the materials. If you can't say it under oath one has to ask why?

 

[g5000]

What if the "highly classified documents" were declassified by President Trump the day before he left office? Cocksucker.

None of you tards has ever explained what rationale Trump would have for declassifying top secret documents, especially ones involving our nuclear capabilities or those of our allies.

You do realize they are classified Top Secret because they could cause "grave national harm" to our country if exposed, right retard?

Right?

Trump is lying to you cucks. You know how you can tell, other than that his lips are moving?

Because all of these stupid hoaxes you idiots are parroting like good little submissive cucks are not being argued by his lawyers in court.

Because as officers of the court, if they made these claims they would be charged with perjury and possibly disbarred.

Ponder that, you damned fool. Trump is lying to you. Again and again and again and again and again.

 

[BS Filter]

An assertion that his attorneys have avoided making in the litigation around the FBI's seizure of the materials. If you can't say it under oath one has to ask why?

Wrong. Do more research.