Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[M14 Shooter]

Because in order to be able to use self-defense, you must meet certain criteria.

Specifically, as you appear to have read the law - what criteria did he not meet?

 

[jc456]

Because in order to be able to use self-defense, you must meet certain criteria.

criteria you submitted and rittenhouse actually did. now we're asking what other options would satisfy you.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What if a 14 year old girl shoots a rapist with a gun she found in her home? Should she do time?

Being in the house and being out in public are two different things followed by two sets of different laws. In the house you may only be endangering yourself and family. When out in public we may be endangering others, especially if you have no training on when to shoot in public.

 

[Lisa558]

There were such horrific and blatant murders all during the BLM riots, and the case they’re making the biggest issue over is a white teenager shooting in self-defense.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The term ASSAULT RIFLE is being misused CONSTANTLY by lying leftist pigs.

KYLE DID NOT HAVE AN ASSAULT RIFLE.

You assholes cannot even define the term.

 

[jc456]

He.... ran.
They chased him and caught up with him.
What's left for him to do?

yep, and why I asked Ray he preferred the kid die then. That was his only other option.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

criteria you submitted and rittenhouse actually did. now we're asking what other options would satisfy you.

No he did not. That's my entire point.

 

[jc456]

The term ASSAULT RIFLE is being misused CONSTANTLY by lying leftist pigs.

KYLE DID NOT HAVE AN ASSAULT RIFLE.

You assholes cannot even define the term.

I did enjoy one of the witnesses answer when the PeeWee herman prosecutor was trying to say an AR15 inflicts more damage than a gun. The witness said a gun is a gun and they both fire bullets. defining harm without an expert.

 

[jc456]

No he did not. That's my entire point.

he ran away from the confrontation, that's what you stated. what did I miss? I also asked you for the other option than die.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Specifically, as you appear to have read the law - what criteria did he not meet?

I repeat, in order to meet the protection of self-defense with a firearm, one must have exercised every possible way to avoid putting themselves in a position where they would have to use that weapon.

 

[eagle1462010]

I have no doubt that had Kyle not opened fire he would be dead right now. This is Self Defense by definitiin.

The Defense Rests.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I did enjoy one of the witnesses answer when the PeeWee herman prosecutor was trying to say an AR15 inflicts more damage than a gun. The witness said a gun is a gun and they both fire bullets.

The ADA must be a Canadian.
Its the only way you can know so little about firearms.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I repeat, in order to meet the protection of self-defense with a firearm, one must have exercised every possible way to avoid putting themselves in a position where they would have to use that weapon.

I ask again:
He.... ran.
They chased him and caught up with him.
What's left for him to do?

 

[Osiris-ODS]

He.... ran. Disengaged. Left the area of conflict.
They chased him and caught up with him.
What's left for him to do?

That's not what happened.
The correct analogy is to go into a biker bar, and call them pussies.
They get up to beat your ass, and you run.
They chase you out of the bar, across the parking lot, down the street, and finally catch you-- with weapons.
At that point you have -every- right to shoot them.
And its not even clear that Rittemhouse called anyone a pussy.

Far from it. The evidence was undisputed that Kyle was saying "friendly, friendly," and asking if anyone needed Medical Care. He didn't verbally confront anybody. Ray's analogy is completely off base and he obviously doesn't know the facts of this case.

 

[jc456]

I repeat, in order to meet the protection of self-defense with a firearm, one must have exercised every possible way to avoid putting themselves in a position where they would have to use that weapon.

he did, i asked you where his other option other than dying was? you still haven't posted that.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

he ran away from the confrontation, that's what you stated. what did I miss? I also asked you for the other option than die.

He ran away from the confrontation after he put himself in the confrontation. That's not what I meant.

 

[jc456]

I ask again:
He.... ran.
They chased him and caught up with him.
What's left for him to do?

ahhh you beat me to it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

he did, i asked you where his other option other than dying was? you still haven't posted that.

Look back at my other posts. I only posted it a half-dozen or more times already.

 

[M14 Shooter]

He ran away from the confrontation after he put himself in the confrontation.

He put himself someplace where he might be harmed.
Under WI law, that negates his right to self-defense?
Can you cite the section and the text to that effect?

 

[jc456]

He ran away from the confrontation after he put himself in the confrontation. That's not what I meant.

where did he do that? are you suggesting again, because he wasn't supposed to be there? and again, he was. It's a moot point at this time. Therefore, you're saying he should just be dead. it seems you are also suggesting the point that there was no way for anyone there to defend themselves. So rosenbaum wasn't supposed to be there. there was a curfew.