Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

No, he's saying that Kyle shouldn't have been there in the first place,
This does not in anyway diminish his claim of self-defense.
and he shouldn't have been pointing his gun and threatening people.
The only people he pointed his gun at are the people he shot... in self-defense.
 
When he seen trouble going on, he addressed it instead of moving away from it as the law requires in order to use deadly force as a self-defense claim.
Omfg He put out a fire by the Thugs and the went after him. They lucky it was this kid because i wouldnt have run lol.
 
May be an image of 4 people and text that says 'HE DIDN'T CRY WHEN he illegally armed himself and crossed state lines to protect property, that he neither owned, nor knew who did. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he shot 3 people and strolled past police brandishing his illegal weapon. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he violated the terms of his bail. He ONLY CRIED WHEN he was faced with the possibility of being held accountable for his heartless actions. OCCUPY DEMOCRATS''HE DIDN'T CRY WHEN he illegally armed himself and crossed state lines to protect property, that he neither owned, nor knew who did. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he shot 3 people and strolled past police brandishing his illegal weapon. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he violated the terms of his bail. He ONLY CRIED WHEN he was faced with the possibility of being held accountable for his heartless actions. OCCUPY DEMOCRATS'
May be an image of 4 people and text that says 'It's hard to take the tears of Kyle Rittenhouse seriously seeing how just a few months ago he was partying in a bar with the Proud Boys flashing their secret white power symbol while wearing a T-shirt that said 'Free as F*ck.'''It's hard to take the tears of Kyle Rittenhouse seriously seeing how just a few months ago he was partying in a bar with the Proud Boys flashing their secret white power symbol while wearing a T-shirt that said 'Free as F*ck.''
Congrats - you win the LeBron James Asshole award...
 
deliberately how? know one was allowed there, so everyone was at fault.

And again you're saying he had no right to defend himself. he should have died. wow. dude total demofk moment for you.

Why are people here putting words in my mouth all the time? I never said he should die, I never said he was not attacked. I said that given he deliberately attended a violent situation illegally armed and made no attempt to get the hell out of there when trouble was brewing, he simply is not covered under their self-defense law with a firearm. The law states you need to take any and every measure possible to assure you do not have to use that deadly weapon.

It's like my earlier analogy of me going into a biker bar and yelling "all bikers are pussies!" then when a few get pissed and come after me, I gun them down claiming they attacked me. I am not covered under our self-defense law with a firearm. I'm going to jail because I created a situation where they would attack me. Same thing here.
 
This prosecutor seems to want to discredit EVERY photographer who was out there by claiming bias...
From the video expert, the photographer yesterday, and the video photographer today...

Obviously he doesn't like cameras unless he is holding them.
the one I truly enjoyed was the video he played for Mr. Hernandez showing grosskruetz giving first aid, like that erases him pulling a firearm and pointing said firearm at Rittenhouse's head while aggressively charging at him. Yep, the ole jedi force thing.
 
I thought pretty much the same as you do until I watched the trial. A lot of what you said in this post is inaccurate. I'm not going to go through every correction based on the evidence that was presented, but suffice it to say I was wrong initially about his intention and what he was doing at the time. This seems a clear case of self-defense.

Exactly.

Amazing what one can find out when they deal with FACTS over NARRATIVE.

The media lies have been absolutely DECIMATED.

Still, the blind sheep will listen to the PFIZER SPONSORED MEDIA.
 
The prosecutor didn't seem to learn from yesterday, still got hammered some today.
 
Why are people here putting words in my mouth all the time? I never said he should die, I never said he was not attacked. I said that given he deliberately attended a violent situation illegally armed and made no attempt to get the hell out of there when trouble was brewing, he simply is not covered under their self-defense law with a firearm. The law states you need to take any and every measure possible to assure you do not have to use that deadly weapon.

It's like my earlier analogy of me going into a biker bar and yelling "all bikers are pussies!" then when a few get pissed and come after me, I gun them down claiming they attacked me. I am not covered under our self-defense law with a firearm. I'm going to jail because I created a situation where they would attack me. Same thing here.
You have a hard on to Frag the kid. Hung jury bro
 
Why are people here putting words in my mouth all the time? I never said he should die, I never said he was not attacked. I said that given he deliberately attended a violent situation illegally armed and made no attempt to get the hell out of there when trouble was brewing, he simply is not covered under their self-defense law with a firearm. The law states you need to take any and every measure possible to assure you do not have to use that deadly weapon.

It's like my earlier analogy of me going into a biker bar and yelling "all bikers are pussies!" then when a few get pissed and come after me, I gun them down claiming they attacked me. I am not covered under our self-defense law with a firearm. I'm going to jail because I created a situation where they would attack me. Same thing here.
sure you did, you said he could never defend himself legally. Then you offered up one way he could of, the option he did choose, and you still continued with the no self defense for him was available mantra.
 
Why are people here putting words in my mouth all the time? I never said he should die, I never said he was not attacked. I said that given he deliberately attended a violent situation illegally armed and made no attempt to get the hell out of there when trouble was brewing, he simply is not covered under their self-defense law with a firearm. The law states you need to take any and every measure possible to assure you do not have to use that deadly weapon.

It's like my earlier analogy of me going into a biker bar and yelling "all bikers are pussies!" then when a few get pissed and come after me, I gun them down claiming they attacked me. I am not covered under our self-defense law with a firearm. I'm going to jail because I created a situation where they would attack me. Same thing here.
actually the evidence shows he ran away…and in fact to a corner. Which is what is required and what the evidence showed

I don’t disagree he shouldn’t of been there…but there is no law against being there. and being there doesn’t justify that he be attacked
 
Why are people here putting words in my mouth all the time? I never said he should die, I never said he was not attacked. I said that given he deliberately attended a violent situation illegally armed and made no attempt to get the hell out of there when trouble was brewing, he simply is not covered under their self-defense law with a firearm. The law states you need to take any and every measure possible to assure you do not have to use that deadly weapon.
He.... ran. Disengaged. Left the area of conflict.
They chased him and caught up with him.
What's left for him to do?
It's like my earlier analogy of me going into a biker bar and yelling "all bikers are pussies!" then when a few get pissed and come after me, I gun them down claiming they attacked me.
That's not what happened.
The correct analogy is to go into a biker bar, and call them pussies.
They get up to beat your ass, and you run.
They chase you out of the bar, across the parking lot, down the street, and finally catch you-- with weapons.
At that point you have -every- right to shoot them.
And its not even clear that Rittemhouse called anyone a pussy.
 
Yea, but not much they can do as they have a losing case and they know it.
yep, indeed. they had no evidence to show rittenhouse provoked anyone. So their entire strategy was gone. No video or testimony to show Rosenbaum was the aggressor. None.
 
Back
Top Bottom