Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

It's not reasonable to shoot someone in the back who is face down who is no longer a threat.

And Rittenhouse had a reasonable means to escape while Rosenbaum was face down before being shot in the back.
he didnt do that as per the testimony of first hand witnesses,,
 
The left want anyone using a firearm lawfully to be punished harshly, and repeat offenders of unlawful use to go free.

Why could POSSIBLY be the motivation here?
 
It's not reasonable to shoot someone in the back who is face down who is no longer a threat.

And Rittenhouse had a reasonable means to escape while Rosenbaum was face down before being shot in the back.

Who says Rittenhouse shot him in the back? You certainly can't see it on the video.
 
The states "star witness" is supposed to take the stand this morning first thing.

For the states sake I hope hes better than what they have offered so far!!!!
 
It has to be a reasonable belief, fucking moron. That is going to come down to what the jury decides is reasonable.
Testimony so far indicates that Rittenhouse reasonably believed that Rosenbaum intended to take his rifle, which one can only assume that if his rifle is taken, he will be shot with it.

So, tell us, based no the testimony so far, do you believe that Rittenhouse reasonably believed his life was in danger when Rosenbaum lunged at him and tried to take the rifle?

(you won't answer)
 
It has to be a reasonable belief, fucking moron. That is going to come down to what the jury decides is reasonable.
It seems entirely reasonable to me. The guy told Rittenhouse he was going to kill him. He tried to take Rittenhouses rifle.
 
Testimony so far indicates that Rittenhouse reasonably believed that Rosenbaum intended to take his rifle, which one can only assume that if his rifle is taken, he will be shot with it.

So, tell us, based no the testimony so far, do you believe that Rittenhouse reasonably believed his life was in danger when Rosenbaum lunged at him and tried to take the rifle?

(you won't answer)
Yes, I believe he reasonably felt his life was in danger.
 
It seems entirely reasonable to me. The guy told Rittenhouse he was going to kill him. He tried to take Rittenhouses rifle.
Matters not if it seems reasonable to a fucking moron like you. It only matters what the jury finds reasonable.
 
we arent talking about where they hit but when they were fired,,and what you claim is wrong,,
not sure why youre moving the goal post,,
Of course it matters where they hit. Someone who is face down after being shot 3 times is no longer a threat. Shooting them a 4th time in the back is excessive force.
 
Back
Top Bottom